Drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) is used for directly visualizing sites of obstruction among patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Owing to the scarcity of data, there is still no consensus on the anesthetic regimen for conducting pediatric DISE.

This paper presents a 5-year-old patient who underwent DISE using an opioid-sparing regimen with dexmedetomidine and propofol infusion.

Simultaneous dexmedetomidine and propofol infusion is a promising opioid-sparing regimen for pediatric DISE.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of intravenous single dose lidocaine versus single dose propofol in controlling emergence agitation in children aged 2-6 years old for surgery under sevoflurane anesthesia in Philippine Children’s Medical Center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a double-blind, randomized controlled trial of 64 children aged 2-6 years who had surgery under general anesthesia using sevoflurane. Patients were randomly assigned into 2 equal groups – the experimental (Lidocaine, L) group and the control (Propofol, P) group. Five (5) minutes prior to the discontinuation of sevoflurane, the patient assigned to the L group was given Lidocaine at 1.5 mg/kg IV while the patient assigned to the P group was given Propofol 1 mg/kg IV. Patients were monitored using Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) and Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) scales 5 minutes after giving the medication until discharge from the PACU. Data was collected using a data abstraction form. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of emergence agitation (RR= 0.5, 95% CI [0.098, 2.54], pvalue= 0.672) and post- operative pain (RR:0.6, 95% CI [0.033, 1.91], pvalue = 0.426). No adverse events were observed in both groups. CONCLUSION Both Lidocaine and Propofol are effective in preventing emergence agitation.
propofol ; lidocaine

OBJECTIVES: To explore the relationship between the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAAS) score and the bispectral index (BIS) during propofol titration for general anesthesia induction and analyze the impact of BIS monitoring delay on anesthetic depth assessment. METHODS: This study was conducted among 90 patients (ASA class I-II) undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia. For anesthesia induction, the patients received propofol titration at the rate of 0.5 mg·kg^-1·min^-1 till OAAS scores of 4, 3, 2, and 1 were reached. After achieving an OAAS score of 1, remifentanil (2 μg·kg⁻¹) and rocuronium (0.6 mg·kg⁻¹) were administered, and tracheal intubation was performed 2 min later. BIS values, mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and propofol dosage at each OAAS score were recorded, and the correlation between OAAS scores and BIS values was analyzed. The diagnostic performance of BIS values for determining when the OAAS score reaches 1 was analyzed using ROC curve. RESULTS: All the patients successfully completed tracheal intubation. BIS values of the patients at each of the OAAS scores differed significantly (P<0.01), and the mean BIS value decreased by 4.08, 8.32, 5.43 and 5.24 as the OAAS score decreased from 5 to 4, from 4 to 3, from 3 to 2, and from 2 to 1, respectively. There was a significant correlation between the OAAS score and BIS values (ρ=0.775, P<0.001). The median BIS value for an OAAS score of 1 was 76, at which point 83.33% of the patients had BIS values exceeding 60. ROC curve analysis showed that for determining an OAAS score of 1, BIS value, at the optimal cutoff value of 84, had a sensitivity of 88.9%, a specificity of 73.3%, and an area under the curve of 0.842 (0.803-0.881). CONCLUSIONS OAAS score during induction of general anesthesia is strongly correlated with BIS value and is a highly sensitive and timely indicator to compensate for the delay in BIS monitoring.
Humans ; Propofol/administration & dosage* ; Male ; Female ; Middle Aged ; Anesthesia, General/methods* ; Adult ; Consciousness Monitors ; Aged ; Young Adult ; Monitoring, Intraoperative/methods* ; Electroencephalography

OBJECTIVES: To assess the regulatory effect of cannabidiol (CBD) on circadian rhythm sleep disorders following general anesthesia and explore its potential mechanism in a rat model of propofol-induced rhythm sleep disorder. METHODS: An electrode was embedded in the skull for cortical EEG recording in 24 male SD rats, which were randomized into control, propofol, CBD treatment, and diazepam treatment groups (n=6). Eight days later, a single dose of propofol (10 mg/kg) was injected via the tail vein with anesthesia maintenance for 3 h in the latter 3 groups, and daily treatment with saline, CBD or diazepam was administered via gavage; the control rats received only saline injection. A wireless system was used for collecting EEG, EMG, and body temperature data within 72 h after propofol injection. After data collection, blood samples and hypothalamic tissue samples were collected for determining serum levels of oxidative stress markers and hypothalamic expressions of the key clock proteins. RESULTS: Compared with the control rats, the rats with CBD treatment showed significantly increased sleep time at night (20:00-6:00), especially during the time period of 4:00-6:00 am. Compared with the rats in propofol group, which had prolonged SWS time and increased sleep episodes during 18:00-24:00 and sleep-wake transitions, the CBD-treated rats exhibited a significant reduction of SWS time and fewer SWS-to-active-awake transitions with increased SWS aspects and sleep-wake transitions at night (24:00-08:00). Diazepam treatment produced similar effect to CBD but with a weaker effect on sleep-wake transitions. Propofol caused significant changes in protein expressions and redox state, which were effectively reversed by CBD treatment. CONCLUSIONS CBD can improve sleep structure and circadian rhythm in rats with propofol-induced sleep disorder possibly by regulating hypothalamic expressions of the key circadian clock proteins, suggesting a new treatment option for perioperative sleep disorders.
Animals ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; Male ; Cannabidiol/therapeutic use* ; Rats ; Circadian Rhythm/drug effects* ; Propofol/adverse effects* ; Anesthesia, General/adverse effects* ; Sleep Wake Disorders/chemically induced* ; Hypothalamus/metabolism* ; Electroencephalography

The primary intravenous anesthetics employed in clinical practice encompass dexmedetomidine (Dex), propofol, ketamine, etomidate, midazolam, and remimazolam. Apart from their established sedative, analgesic, and anxiolytic properties, an increasing body of research has uncovered neuroprotective effects of intravenous anesthetics in various animal and cellular models, as well as in clinical studies. However, there also exists conflicting evidence pointing to the potential neurotoxic effects of these intravenous anesthetics. The role of intravenous anesthetics for neuro on both sides of protection or toxicity has been rarely summarized. Considering the mentioned above, this work aims to offer a comprehensive understanding of the underlying mechanisms involved both in the central nerve system (CNS) and the peripheral nerve system (PNS) and provide valuable insights into the potential safety and risk associated with the clinical use of intravenous anesthetics.
Animals ; Humans ; Anesthetics, Intravenous/adverse effects* ; Neuroprotective Agents/pharmacology* ; Propofol ; Neurotoxicity Syndromes/prevention & control* ; Central Nervous System/drug effects* ; Dexmedetomidine

General anesthesia, pivotal for surgical procedures, requires precise depth monitoring to mitigate risks ranging from intraoperative awareness to postoperative cognitive impairments. Traditional assessment methods, relying on physiological indicators or behavioral responses, fall short of accurately capturing the nuanced states of unconsciousness. This study introduces a machine learning-based approach to decode anesthesia depth, leveraging EEG data across different anesthesia states induced by propofol and esketamine in rats. Our findings demonstrate the model's robust predictive accuracy, underscored by a novel intra-subject dataset partitioning and a 5-fold cross-validation method. The research diverges from conventional monitoring by utilizing anesthetic infusion rates as objective indicators of anesthesia states, highlighting distinct EEG patterns and enhancing prediction accuracy. Moreover, the model's ability to generalize across individuals suggests its potential for broad clinical application, distinguishing between anesthetic agents and their depths. Despite relying on rat EEG data, which poses questions about real-world applicability, our approach marks a significant advance in anesthesia monitoring.
Animals ; Machine Learning ; Electroencephalography/methods* ; Ketamine/administration & dosage* ; Rats ; Male ; Propofol/administration & dosage* ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; Anesthesia, General/methods* ; Brain/physiology* ; Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring/methods*

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the glutamatergic neurons in the paraventricular nucleus of the thalamus (PVT) is involved in the change of consciousness induced by propofol through a combination of behavioral and electroencephalography (EEG) recordings. METHODS: Healthy male VGluT2-IRES-Cre mice aged 8-12 weeks were used in this experiment. (1) The glutamatergic neurons in the PVT was selectively damaged, and its effect on propofol anesthesia induction and recovery times as well as the energy of EEG in different frequency bands were observed. (2) Optogenetics was utilized to selectively activate or inhibit glutamatergic neurons in the PVT to assess their influence on anesthesia induction and recovery times under propofol as well as the energy of EEG in different frequency bands. RESULTS: (1) Selective ablation of glutamatergic neurons in the PVT significantly delayed recovery from propofol anesthesia with statistical difference as compared with the control group (s: 409.43±117.49 vs. 273.71±51.52, P < 0.05), but had no significant effect on anesthesia induction time. During the recovery phase of propofol, selective ablation of glutamatergic neurons in the PVT exhibited higher α-wave (1-4 Hz) power and reduced β-wave (12-15 Hz) power as compared with the control group. (2) Optogenetic activation of glutamatergic neurons in the PVT significantly prolonged anesthesia induction time under propofol (s: 161.67±29.09 vs. 119.33±18.98, P < 0.05) while significantly shortening the recovery time from propofol anesthesia (s: 208.67±57.19 vs. 288.83±34.52, P < 0.05). During the induction phase of propofol, activation of glutamatergic neurons in PVT reduced α-wave and α-wave (8-12 Hz) power, while during the recovery phase, α-wave power significantly increased as compared with the control group. (3) Optogenetic inhibition of glutamatergic neurons in the PVT delayed recovery from propofol anesthesia (s: 403.50±129.06 vs. 252.83±45.31, P < 0.05), but had no significant effect on induction time. During both the induction phase and recovery phase of propofol, the optogenetic inhibition of glutamatergic neurons in the PVT exhibited increased α-wave power. CONCLUSION Glutamatergic neurons in the PVT are involved in the regulation of propofol anesthesia recovery process.
Animals ; Propofol/pharmacology* ; Mice ; Neurons/physiology* ; Male ; Electroencephalography ; Wakefulness ; Midline Thalamic Nuclei ; Optogenetics

Propofol/therapeutic use* ; Depression/drug therapy*

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of propofol used for painless gastroscopy and colonoscopy on psychomotility recovery. METHODS: One hundred adult patients undergoing painless gastroscopy and colonoscopy were recruited, aged 18-72 years, with American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) physical status Ⅰ-Ⅱ. According to age, the patients were divided into youth group (20-39 years old, 27 cases), middle age group (40-54 years old, 37 cases), and elder group (55-64 years old, 36 cases). Propofol was continuously infused according to the patients' condition to mantain the bispectal index (BIS) score 55-64. All the patients received psychomotility assesment 30 min before the operations when the discharge criteria were met including number cancellation test, number connection test and board test. The heart rate, blood pressure, saturation of pulse oximetry, electrocardiograph and BIS were monitored during the operation. The operating time, recovery time, total volume of propofol and discharge time were recorded. If the results obtained were inferior to those before operation, a third assessment was taken 30 minutes later until the results recovered or being superior to the baseline levels. RESULTS: All the patients completed the first and second assessments, and 25 patients had taken the third assessment. There was no statistically significant difference in the results of psychomotility assessment when the patients met the discharge standard. Furthermore, the results were analyzed by grouping with age, and there was no statistical difference in the test results of the youth and middle age groups compared with the preoperative group, among which, the efficiency of the number cancellation test was significantly better than that before operation in the youth group (P < 0.05). However, in the elderly patients the number cancellation efficiency, number connection test and board test were significantly inferior to that before operation (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the accuracy of number cancellation compared with that before operation. The patients who needed the third test in the elder group were significantly more than in the other groups (P < 0.05). Compared with the preoperative results, there was no statistical difference in the test results of those who completed the third test. CONCLUSION The psychomotility function of the patients who underwent painless gastroscopy and colonoscopy was recovered when they met discharge criteria. The elderly patients had a prolonged recovery period.
Adult ; Aged ; Middle Aged ; Adolescent ; Humans ; Young Adult ; Propofol ; Hypnotics and Sedatives ; Gastroscopy/methods* ; Conscious Sedation/methods* ; Colonoscopy/methods*

OBJECTIVE: To explore the regulatory effects of GABAergic neurons in the zona incerta (ZI) on sevoflurane and propofol anesthesia. METHODS: Forty-eight male C57BL/6J mice divided into 8 groups (n=6) were used in this study. In the study of sevoflurane anesthesia, chemogenetic experiment was performed in 2 groups of mice with injection of either adeno-associated virus carrying hM3Dq (hM3Dq group) or a virus carrying only mCherry (mCherry group). The optogenetic experiment was performed in another two groups of mice injected with an adeno-associated virus carrying ChR2 (ChR2 group) or GFP only (GFP group). The same experiments were also performed in mice for studying propofol anesthesia. Chemogenetics or optogenetics were used to induce the activation of GABAergic neurons in the ZI, and their regulatory effects on anesthesia induction and arousal with sevoflurane and propofol were observed; EEG monitoring was used to observe the changes in sevoflurane anesthesia maintenance after activation of the GABAergic neurons. RESULTS: In sevoflurane anesthesia, the induction time of anesthesia was significantly shorter in hM3Dq group than in mCherry group (P < 0.05), and also shorter in ChR2 group than in GFP group (P < 0.01), but no significant difference was found in the awakening time between the two groups in either chemogenetic or optogenetic tests. Similar results were observed in chemogenetic and optogenetic experiments with propofol (P < 0.05 or 0.01). Photogenetic activation of the GABAergic neurons in the ZI did not cause significant changes in EEG spectrum during sevoflurane anesthesia maintenance. CONCLUSION Activation of the GABAergic neurons in the ZI promotes anesthesia induction of sevoflurane and propofol but does not affect anesthesia maintenance or awakening.
Male ; Animals ; Mice ; Mice, Inbred C57BL ; Propofol/pharmacology* ; Sevoflurane/pharmacology* ; Zona Incerta ; Anesthesia, General ; GABAergic Neurons