Since the bacteria metabolites in the process of growth and reproduction of can lower the resistivity characteristics of the medium, the electrical impedance method can develop a rapid detection device of bacterial drug sensitivity. The device consists of micro-organisms impedance sensors, computer systems, signal generator, resistance Anti-detection circuit, the time allocation controller, constant temperature incubator and auxiliary circuits and other components. It measures the electrical impedance of the medium, and bacteria in the culture period to obtain the impedance value of the monitor into the impedance curve. Drug sensitivity of bacteria can be determined, using this form of differential impedance curve. This detection device significantly shortened the time of bacterial drug susceptibility testing, achieving rapid drug susceptibility testing of clinical medicine, drug susceptibility testing automation and intelligence.
Bacteria ; drug effects ; Electric Impedance ; Equipment Design ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests ; instrumentation ; methods

BACKGROUND: With the emergence of antimicrobial resistance among Streptococcus pneumoniae, a more accurate and automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing method is essential. We evaluated the BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology System (Becton Dickinson Diagnostic Systems, USA) SMIC/ID-2 panel for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of S. pneumoniae. METHODS: A total of 113 clinical strains of S. pneumoniae (88 penicillin susceptible strains, 8 intermediate strains, and 17 resistant strains by 2008 CLSI criteria) were tested. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for penicillin, cefotaxime, clindamycin, erythromycin, levofloxacin, trimethoprim/ sulfamethoxazole, tetracycline, and vancomycin were determined by Etest (AB Biodisk, Sweden) and Phoenix System. The results obtained by Phoenix system were compared to those obtained by Etest. RESULTS: The overall essential agreement of MICs (within one dilution of MICs) defined by the Phoenix and Etest was 92.3%. Neither very major errors nor major errors were produced, and minor errors were 6.5%. Minor errors were frequently observed in susceptibility testings for penicillin (22.1%), cefotaxime (12.4%), and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (11.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The Phoenix SMIC/ID-2 panel provided a simple and rapid susceptibility testing for S. pneumoniae, and the results were in a good agreement with those of Etest. The Phoenix system appears to be an effective automated system in clinical microbiology laboratories.
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology ; Bacterial Typing Techniques/instrumentation/methods ; Drug Resistance, Bacterial ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests/*methods ; Reagent Kits, Diagnostic ; Streptococcus pneumoniae/*drug effects/growth & development/isolation & purification

In this study, our self-made micro-electrical impedance sensors and experimental apparatus were used to measure the impedance of bacteria-inoculated medium. Then the bacteria in the culture of all values obtained during the period were recorded into the trace impedance curve. Seeing the obvious difference in morphological change, we utilized the differed impedance curves in an attempt to estimate the morphological difference between the drug sensitivity of bacteria. The studies of clinical medicine for achieving rapid drug sensitivity test, automation and intelligentization of drug sensitivity are of practical significance.
Anti-Bacterial Agents ; pharmacology ; Bacteria ; drug effects ; growth & development ; Bacteriological Techniques ; instrumentation ; methods ; Electric Impedance ; Escherichia coli ; drug effects ; growth & development ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests ; methods ; Salmonella ; drug effects ; growth & development

BACKGROUND: Few studies have evaluated the performance of the recently introduced MicroScan Synergies plus Positive Combo 3 Panels (SIPC3) (Dade Behring Inc., USA). We evaluated the clinical efficacy of the panels in identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of Staphylococcusaureus and enterococci. METHODS: To evaluate the panels' accuracy of identification, the results obtained using the test panels were compared with those obtained by using conventional biochemical tests in conjunction with VITEK 2 system (bio-Merieux, USA). In addition, the AST results obtained using the panels were compared with those obtained by performing CLSI broth microdilution. RESULTS: The overall agreement between the approaches for the ID of S. aureus and enterococci was 100% and 96%, respectively. The categorical and essential agreements (CA and EA) for S. aureus were 98%, each. Very major errors (VME), major errors (ME), and minor error (mE) for S. aureus were 0.45%, 0.3%, and 4.2%, respectively. The majority of VMEs were for oxacillin (8.6%), penicillin (2.0%), erythromycin (7.9%), clindamycin (3.8%), and tetracycline (4.1%). For enterococci, the CA, EA, VME, ME, and mE were 88.8%, 93.7%, 4.4%, 0%, and 2.8%, respectively. The 80.5% (29/36) of Enterococcus faecium had concordant ID with the reference. Most of the categorical errors (3 VMEs and 14 mEs) were observed for quinupristin/dalfopristin (Synercid; Catalytica Pharmaceuticals Inc., USA). CONCLUSIONS: The panels compared favorably with conventional methods for the ID and AST of S. aureus. However, we expected a better performance for ID of E. faecium and AST using Synercid.
Anti-Bacterial Agents/*pharmacology ; Clindamycin/pharmacology ; Drug Resistance, Bacterial ; Enterococcus/*drug effects/isolation & purification ; Erythromycin/pharmacology ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests/instrumentation/*methods ; Oxacillin/pharmacology ; Penicillins/pharmacology ; Reagent Kits, Diagnostic ; Staphylococcus aureus/*drug effects/isolation & purification ; Tetracycline/pharmacology

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the turnaround time for liquid culturing and primary anti-tuberculous drug susceptibility testing (DST) performed using the mycobacteria growth indicator tube (MGIT) 960 system (Becton Dickinson, USA) with that for conventional culturing and DST (by the absolute concentration method) performed using solid culture medium and to determine the concordance rates of DST results obtained using these 2 methods. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we compared the turnaround times from receiving the request for mycobacterial culture to reporting the DST results before and after the introduction of the MGIT 960 system. Further, we determined the concordance between DST results for isoniazid and rifampin for Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates obtained using the MGIT 960 system and the absolute concentration method, which was conducted at the Korean Institute of Tuberculosis. RESULTS: The overall turnaround time for mycobacterial culturing and DST was 27 days for liquid culturing and DST using the MGIT 960 system versus approximately 70 days for culturing on solid medium and DST with the absolute concentration method (P<0.001). There was a good concordance between findings of DST obtained with the 2 methods (97.2%, kappa coefficient=0.855 for rifampin; and 95.6%, kappa coefficient=0.864 for isoniazid), for 1,083 clinical isolates. CONCLUSIONS: The automated MGIT 960 system for culturing and DST of M. tuberculosis was successfully introduced in a hospital laboratory setting in Korea with significant shortening of the turnaround time.
Antitubercular Agents/*pharmacology ; Automation ; *Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial/drug effects ; Humans ; Isoniazid/pharmacology ; *Microbial Sensitivity Tests/instrumentation/methods ; Mycobacterium tuberculosis/*drug effects/growth & development/isolation & purification ; Retrospective Studies ; Rifampin/pharmacology ; Time Factors ; Tuberculosis/*diagnosis

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reliability and clinical practicability of cefoxitin disk diffusion test in the detection of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus (MRS) heterogenic drug-resistant strains. METHODS: Three hundred and ten strains of staphylococcus isolated from clinics were detected by the oxacillin disk diffusion test, the cefoxitin disk diffusion test as well as the oxacillin agar dilution test according to the standard operation procedures of NCCLS, and the detection of mecA gene of staphylococcus was used as a criterion. The sensitivities and specitivities of the 4 methods were compared. RESULTS: By the detection of mecA gene, the ratio for MRSA was 57.1%(113/198) and the ratio for MRCNS was 62.5%(70/112). Both the sensitivity and specificity of cefoxitin disk diffusion test in the detection of MRS were 100%, and those in the detection of MRCNS were 98.6% and 100%. CONCLUSION Cefoxitin disk diffusion test is reliable, simple and convenient, and it can be used as a conventional method for the detection of MRS in clinical laboratories.
Anti-Bacterial Agents ; pharmacology ; Bacterial Proteins ; genetics ; Cefoxitin ; pharmacology ; Humans ; Methicillin ; pharmacology ; Methicillin Resistance ; genetics ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests ; instrumentation ; methods ; Oxacillin ; pharmacology ; Penicillin-Binding Proteins ; Reproducibility of Results ; Staphylococcus aureus ; drug effects ; genetics ; isolation & purification

BACKGROUND: Procedures for rapid identification and susceptibility testing by direct inoculation (DI) from positive blood culture bottles into an automated system have not been standardized. This study was purposed to evaluate DI from BACTEC 9240 blood culture system (BD, USA) into MicroScan (Dade Behring, USA) or Phoenix (BD, USA). METHODS: From May to June 2006, bacterial pellets from positive aerobic bottles showing gram-positive cocci (GPC) or gram-negative rods (GNR) of single morphology were directly inoculated to MicroScan PosCombo1A and NegCombo32 and to Phoenix PMIC/ID-107 and NMIC/ID-53. In addition, the automated instruments were also inoculated from subcultures (standard inoculations, SI). Species identification and susceptibilities were compared between DI and SI and between MicroScan and Phoenix. RESULTS: A total of 108, 104, and 78 specimens were tested with MicroScan, Phoenix, and both, respectively. When DI and SI were matched, 94.8% of GPC were correctly identified with MicroScan, compared to 80.7% with Phoenix, and 93.9% of GNR were correctly identified with MicroScan, compared to 95.7% with Phoenix. DI with MicroScan and Phoenix showed correct susceptibilities in 94.6% of 1,150 and 96.5% of 660 tests (with very major error [VME] of 1.1% and 1.1%), respectively, among GPC and in 94.4% of 942 and 96.3% of 781 tests (with VME of 0.6% and 0%), respectively, of GNR. Correlation of identification/susceptibilities between MicroScan and Phoenix using DI were 81.8%/98.0% for Staphylococcus aureus and 100.0%/95.6% for Escherichia coli. CONCLUSIONS: DI warrants a reliable method for identification and susceptibility testing of both GPC and GNR in MicroScan, and those of only GNR in Phoenix.
Automation ; Bacterial Typing Techniques/instrumentation/*methods ; Culture Media ; Gram-Negative Bacteria/*classification/drug effects/isolation & purification ; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/blood/*microbiology ; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/blood/*microbiology ; Gram-Positive Cocci/*classification/drug effects/isolation & purification ; Humans ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests/instrumentation/*methods ; Reagent Kits, Diagnostic ; Sensitivity and Specificity

We evaluate the performance of Xpert MTB/RIF for the diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) in China. The performance of Xpert was evaluated compared to the composite reference standard (CRS), drug susceptibility testing (DST), and imaging examination. The overall sensitivity and specificity of Xpert were 64.1% (195/304) and 100% (24/24), respectively, using CRS as the gold standard. The sensitivity was significantly higher than that of culture for pus (P<0.05). The proportion of EPTB-positive cases diagnosed by imaging was two times more than that diagnosed using Xpert; however, 6 out of 19 cases may have been overdiagnosed by imaging. Compared to phenotypic DST, the sensitivity and specificity of Xpert were 80% (12/15) and 100% (75/75), respectively. Considering its high sensitivity and specificity, Xpert MTB/RIF may be used as a rapid initial test for EPTB diagnosis, and may also support a quicker decision on the treatment regimen. The combination of imaging and Xpert testing could provide high efficiency and accurate diagnosis of suspected EPTB.
Bacterial Proteins ; genetics ; metabolism ; China ; DNA-Directed RNA Polymerases ; genetics ; metabolism ; Diagnostic Tests, Routine ; instrumentation ; methods ; Drug Resistance, Bacterial ; Humans ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests ; Mycobacterium tuberculosis ; drug effects ; genetics ; isolation & purification ; metabolism ; Retrospective Studies ; Rifampin ; pharmacology ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Sputum ; Tuberculosis ; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary ; diagnosis ; microbiology

Isolated alkaloids from Coptis chinensis Franch. The compounds were identified as berberine, columbamine, groenlandicine, jatrorrhizine, magnoflorine, corydaldine and ferulic acid methylester. Then measured their bitter degree based on the electronic tongue and evaluated the antibacterial. The results based on the Electronic Tongue showed that berberine, columbamine, groenlandicine and jatrorrhizine have higher bitter degree than magnoflorine and corydaldine. And they also appeared better antibacterial activity on E. coli and S. aureus. The correlation coefficients between bitter degree and the two bacteria antibacterial activity were 0.983 and 0.911. So there was close relationship between the bitter degree and antibacterial activity of bitter components. Thus, it is confirmed further that bitter components are the material foundation of medicinal effectiveness of bitter herbs.
Aporphines ; analysis ; Berberine ; analogs & derivatives ; analysis ; Berberine Alkaloids ; analysis ; Biomedical Research ; instrumentation ; methods ; Coptis ; chemistry ; Drugs, Chinese Herbal ; analysis ; chemistry ; pharmacology ; Electronics ; instrumentation ; methods ; Escherichia coli ; drug effects ; growth & development ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests ; Reproducibility of Results ; Staphylococcus aureus ; drug effects ; growth & development ; Taste