PURPOSE: Laparoscopic surgery has become the mainstream surgical operation due to its stability and feasibility. Even for liver surgery, the laparoscopic approach has become an integral procedure. According to the recent international consensus meeting on laparoscopic liver surgery, laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy (LLS) might be a new standard of care for left lateral surgical lesions. This study was designed to compare open LLS to laparoscopic LLS. METHODS: In total, 82 patients who had undergone LLS at Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital between 2008 and 2015 were enrolled in this study. Among them, 59 patients underwent open LLS and 23 underwent laparoscopic LLS. These two groups were compared according to general characteristics and operative outcomes. RESULTS: The data analysis results showed that laparoscopic liver resection is superior to open liver resection in terms of the amount of bleeding during the operation and the duration of hospital stay. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of operation time (p value=0.747). The amount of bleeding during the operation was 145.5±149.4 ml on average for the laparoscopic group and 320±243.8 ml on average for the open group (p value=0.005). The mean duration of hospital stay was 10.7±5.8 days for the laparoscopic surgery group and 12.2±5.1 days for the open surgery group (p value=0.003). CONCLUSION: This study showed that laparoscopic LLS is safe and feasible, because it involves less blood loss and a shorter hospital stay. For left lateral lesions, laparoscopic LLS might be the first option to be considered.
Consensus ; Hemorrhage ; Humans ; Jeollanam-do ; Laparoscopy ; Length of Stay ; Liver ; Standard of Care ; Statistics as Topic

Since laparoscopic liver resection was first introduced in 2001, Korean surgeons have chosen a laparoscopic procedure as one of the treatment options for benign or malignant liver disease. We distributed and analyzed a nationwide questionnaire to members of the Korean Laparoscopic Liver Surgery Study Group (KLLSG) in order to evaluate the current status of laparoscopic liver resection in Korea. Questionnaires were sent to 24 centers of KLLSG. The questionnaire consisted of operative procedure, histological diagnosis of liver lesions, indications for resection, causes of conversion to open surgery, and postoperative outcomes. A laparoscopic liver resection was performed in 416 patients from 2001 to 2008. Of 416 patients, 59.6% had malignant tumors, and 40.4% had benign diseases. A total laparoscopic approach was performed in 88.7%. Anatomical laparoscopic liver resection was more commonly performed than non-anatomical resection (59.9% vs 40.1%). The anatomical laparoscopic liver resection procedures consisted of a left lateral sectionectomy (29.3%), left hemihepatectomy (19.2%), right hemihepatectomy (6%), right posterior sectionectomy (4.3%), central bisectionectomy (0.5%), and caudate lobectomy (0.5%). Laparoscopy-related serious complications occurred in 12 (2.8%) patients. The present study findings provide data in terms of indication, type and method of liver resection, and current status of laparoscopic liver resection in Korea.
*Hepatectomy/statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; *Laparoscopy/statistics & numerical data ; Liver/*surgery ; Liver Diseases/pathology/surgery ; Liver Neoplasms/pathology/surgery ; Postoperative Complications/epidemiology ; Questionnaires ; Republic of Korea

Through continuous development, metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) has become widely recognized in academic and medical circles. In China, the volume of MBS operations has increased year by year. Therapeutic goals of MBS have evolved from treating obesity to treating Type 2 diabetes mellitus, and further to treating a series of obesity-associated metabolic diseases (including conditions in the endocrine system, circulatory system, respiratory system, reproductive system, and etc). Surgical approach of MBS has also been evolving continuously. Currently the common surgical procedures include laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB), laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) and bilio-pancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS). All surgical procedures have pros and cons, and the choice of surgical procedures should be based on the conditions of patients, the surgeon's technical ability, and benefits and operative risks. With the development of MBS, the proportions of different surgical procedures also changed in China. In recent five years, the proportion of AGB has decreased continuously and LAGB is no longer a common procedure. The proportion of LSG has increased rapidly, rising from 9% in 2010 to 55% in 2015. The proportion of RYGB has increased from 57% to 64% between 2010 and 2013, and remained at 45% afterwards. Since 2010, most MBS operations are laparoscopic surgery. 3D Laparoscopic surgery, laparoendoscopic single-site surgery and da Vinci Robotic Surgery have also been introduced in MBS. This review discusses the status quo and changes of MBS in china, as well as the new technology in MBS, aiming to strengthen the information and comprehension of MBS in china.
Bariatric Surgery ; methods ; statistics & numerical data ; trends ; Biliopancreatic Diversion ; statistics & numerical data ; trends ; China ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; surgery ; Disease Management ; Endoscopy, Digestive System ; statistics & numerical data ; trends ; Gastrectomy ; statistics & numerical data ; trends ; Gastric Bypass ; statistics & numerical data ; trends ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; statistics & numerical data ; trends ; Metabolic Diseases ; surgery ; Obesity ; surgery ; Robotic Surgical Procedures ; statistics & numerical data ; trends

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is a new era of minimally invasive surgery which has the potential to offer scarless surgery. So far, numerous reports on various routes to peritoneal organs in NOTES have been published. In case of transgastric approach, it is more inconvenient than transcolonic approach to access upper abdominal organs because of retroflexion. However, most data were subjective and there was no report examining the best access route for the exploration of peritoneal organs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the best access route according to the abdominal organs objectively. METHODS: Six female pigs weighing 30 to 35 kg were placed under general anesthesia. Incisions were made on both anterior wall of stomach body and rectosigmoid colon 15 to 20 cm above anal verge, respectively. Then, via each incision site, we evaluated the endoscopic visibility and checked the elapsed time to access abdominal organs in sequence (gallbladder (GB), spleen, bladder, uterus, and ovary). RESULTS: On comparison of the mean time to approach each organs, GB and ovary showed statistical difference in the mean time to approach between transgastric and transcolonic approaches. It took relatively shorter time to access GB via transcolonic route than transgastric route (352.3+/-80.1 sec vs. 222.2+/-82.0 sec, p=0.021). Next, we evaluated the time to access upper organs (GB and spleen) and lower organs (bladder, uterus and ovary). In case of lower organs, it showed no difference in time between transgastric and transcolonic approaches. However, to explore upper organs, transcolonic route was more favorable than transgastric route (351.8+/-80.7 sec vs. 273.3+/-110.3 sec, p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: For exploration of lower organs, there is statistically no significant difference in time between transgastric and transcolonic approaches. But, in case of upper organs, transcolonic approach is superior to transgastric approach.
Animals ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; *Laparoscopy ; Models, Animal ; Peritoneal Cavity/*surgery ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Surgical Procedures, Minimally Invasive ; Swine ; Time

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the technical advantages of 3D laparoscopic and 2D laparoscopic surgery for gastrointestinal tumors.

METHODSClinical data of gastrointestinal cancer patients undergoing 3D laparoscopic or 2D laparoscopic surgery from January 2015 to January 2017 in our department were retrospectively analyzed These patients included 93 gastric cancer cases undergoing laparoscopic radical resection (total gastrectomy, 48 cases in 3D group, 45 cases in 2D group), 45 rectal cancer cases undergoing radical resection combined with lateral lymph node dissection (27 cases in 3D group, 18 cases in 2D group) and 76 right colon cancer cases undergoing radical resection (37 cases in 3D group, 39 cases in 2D group). The enrolled criteria of cases were 18-80 years old and diagnosed as advanced gastric or colorectal cancer by pathological examination. Patients with preoperative distant metastasis, severe heart or lung diseases who were not suitable for laparoscopic surgery, combined organ resection and conversion to open surgery were excluded. The choice of surgical procedure was determined by the discussion between patients and surgeon. Operations were performed by the same surgical team. Total operation time, complex operation time (deep lymph node dissection time, endoscopic intestinal anastomosis time), number of harvested lymph node, number of times in wrong grasp (accurate grasp for the same site needs to position for two times or more) and intraoperative bleeding were compared between 3D group and 2D group.

RESULTSThere were no significant differences in baseline data between 3D group and 2D group. All the patients completed laparoscopic radical operation successfully without conversion to open surgery. In patients with gastric cancer, compared with 2D group, the total operation time was shorter [(185±25) min vs. (190±27) min, P<0.05]; dissection time of No.10 and 11d lymph node [(40±8) min vs. (55±12)min, P<0.05], and No.7, 8, 9 and 12 lymph node [(30±6) min vs. (41±9) min, P<0.05] was shorter; the number of times in wrong grasp (5±2 vs. 11±2, P<0.05) was less in 3D group. In patients with rectal cancer, compared with group 2D, 3D group had shorter time of lateral lymph node dissection [(27±6) min vs. (35±9) min, P<0.05] and laparoscopic anastomosis [(45±7) min vs. (58±11) min, P<0.05]; less number of times in wrong grasp (4±2 vs. 13±2, P<0.05]. In patients with right colon cancer, 3D group had shorter laparoscopic anastomosis time [(38±7) min vs. (44±5) min, P<0.05] and less number of times in wrong grasp (5±1 vs. 13±3, P<0.05] as compared to 2D group.

CONCLUSION3D laparoscopic surgery for gastrointestinal tumors, compared with 2D laparoscopic technology has significant advantages, which can improve the spatial location and depth of operation, decrease the difficulty of fine operation, and shorten the operation time.

Anastomosis, Surgical ; methods ; statistics & numerical data ; Colectomy ; methods ; statistics & numerical data ; Comparative Effectiveness Research ; Female ; Gastrectomy ; methods ; statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Intestines ; surgery ; Laparoscopy ; methods ; statistics & numerical data ; Lymph Node Excision ; methods ; statistics & numerical data ; Lymph Nodes ; surgery ; Male ; Operative Time ; Rectal Neoplasms ; surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Stomach Neoplasms ; surgery

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer and to investigate how surgeons without previous training of laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC) can quickly learn laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer.

METHODSClinical data of 105 cases of laparoscopic rectal resection performed by a group of surgeons without previous training of LC were reviewed. The cases were divided equally into 3 groups (groups A, B and C) according to the sequence of the operations. The operating time, blood loss, lymph node harvest, length of specimen, conversion rate to open surgery, intra- and postoperative complications and hospital stay were compared between the 3 groups.

RESULTSThere were no significant differences between the 3 groups with respect to age, gender, Dukes'stage or surgical approach (P>0.05). The operating time in group A was 196.1+/-30.3 min, significantly longer than that in group B (164.8+/-22.7 min) and group C (158.7+/-20.9 min) (P<0.001), but the operating time did not vary significantly between groups B and C (P>0.05). The blood loss was significantly greater in group A than in groups B and C (72.4+/-21.5, 48.2+/-16.3, and 46.6+/-15.4 ml, respectively, P<0.001), but showed no significant difference between the latter two groups (P>0.05). The rate of conversion to open surgery decreased from 11.4% in group A to 2.9% in group B and group C, but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The rate of intraoperative complications declined from 17.1% in group A to 5.7% in group B and group C, showing no significant difference either. The lymph node harvest, length of specimen, and postoperative complications showed no significant variation between the 3 groups (P>0.05), but group C had significantly shorter mean hospital stay in comparison with groups A and B (P<0.001). The 35 patients in group A received the operation within a time period of 17 months (2.1 cases per month), and operations in groups B and C were done in 7 months (5 cases per month).

CONCLUSIONThe learning curve of laparoscopic rectal resections is approximately 35 cases, and the surgeons without previous experience of laparoscopic cholecystectomy can learn the surgical skills after performing 35 laparoscopic resections for rectal cancer at the monthly frequency of 2.1 cases.

Adult ; Aged ; Clinical Competence ; Female ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Learning ; Length of Stay ; statistics & numerical data ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications ; epidemiology ; Prospective Studies ; Rectal Neoplasms ; surgery ; Rectum ; surgery ; Time Factors

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study was conducted to evaluate whether medical costs can be reduced using endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) instead of conventional surgeries in patients with early gastric cancer (EGC). METHODS: Patients who underwent open gastrectomy (OG), laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (LAG), and ESD for EGC were recruited from three medical institutions in 2009. For macro-costing, the medical costs for each patient were derived from the expenses incurred during the patient's hospital stay and 1-year follow-up. The overall costs in micro-costing were determined by multiplying the unit cost with the resources used during the patients' hospitalization. RESULTS: A total of 194 patients were included in this study. The hospital stay for ESD was 5 to 8 days and was significantly shorter than the 12-day hospital stay for OG or the 11- to 17-day stay for LAG. Using macro-costing, the average medical costs for ESD during the hospital stay ranged from 2.1 to 3.4 million Korean Won (KRW) per patient, and the medical costs for conventional surgeries were estimated to be between 5.1 million and 8.2 million KRW. There were no significant differences in the 1-year follow-up costs between ESD and conventional surgeries. CONCLUSIONS: ESD patients had lower medical costs than those patients who had conventional surgeries for EGC with conservative indications.
*Costs and Cost Analysis ; Dissection/*economics/methods ; Gastrectomy/*economics/methods ; Gastric Mucosa/surgery ; Gastroscopy/*economics/methods ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data ; Republic of Korea ; Stomach Neoplasms/pathology/*surgery

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study was conducted to evaluate whether medical costs can be reduced using endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) instead of conventional surgeries in patients with early gastric cancer (EGC). METHODS: Patients who underwent open gastrectomy (OG), laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (LAG), and ESD for EGC were recruited from three medical institutions in 2009. For macro-costing, the medical costs for each patient were derived from the expenses incurred during the patient's hospital stay and 1-year follow-up. The overall costs in micro-costing were determined by multiplying the unit cost with the resources used during the patients' hospitalization. RESULTS: A total of 194 patients were included in this study. The hospital stay for ESD was 5 to 8 days and was significantly shorter than the 12-day hospital stay for OG or the 11- to 17-day stay for LAG. Using macro-costing, the average medical costs for ESD during the hospital stay ranged from 2.1 to 3.4 million Korean Won (KRW) per patient, and the medical costs for conventional surgeries were estimated to be between 5.1 million and 8.2 million KRW. There were no significant differences in the 1-year follow-up costs between ESD and conventional surgeries. CONCLUSIONS: ESD patients had lower medical costs than those patients who had conventional surgeries for EGC with conservative indications.
*Costs and Cost Analysis ; Dissection/*economics/methods ; Gastrectomy/*economics/methods ; Gastric Mucosa/surgery ; Gastroscopy/*economics/methods ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data ; Republic of Korea ; Stomach Neoplasms/pathology/*surgery

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) surgery for treatment of type 2 diabetes (TD) in patients with a body mass index (BMI) < 27.5 kg/m. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients who underwent LRYGB surgery from March, 2012 to June, 2018 in the General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command and Jinshazhou Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine. The changes in the parameters of glucose metabolism and physical indicators of the patients in the first, second and third years after the surgery were analyzed in patients in low BMI group and high BMI group. RESULTS: All the 74 patients underwent LRYGB successfully without conversion to open surgery. One year after the surgery, fasting blood glucose (FBG), HbA1c, postprandial blood glucose, fasting insulin, HOMA-IR, fasting C-peptide, BMI, body weight and waistline were significantly improved compared with their preoperative values in low BMI group ( < 0.05). At 2 years after the operation, FBG, HbA1c, postprandial blood glucose, HOMA-IR, BMI, body weight and waistline were significantly improved compared with the preoperative values in low BMI group ( < 0.05). In the third year, FBG, HOMA-IR, fasting C-peptide, body weight and waistline were significantly improved compared with the preoperative values in low BMI group ( < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the parameters of glucose metabolism and islet function between low BMI group and high BMI group at different stages. No serious complications occurred in these patients after the surgery. CONCLUSIONS LRYGB is effective for treatment of T2D in Chinese patients with a BMI < 27.5. After the surgery, the patient show reduced waistline without significant weight loss. The long-term results of the surgery still require further investigations with a larger samples and longer follow-up.
Body Mass Index ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; surgery ; Gastric Bypass ; statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Weight Loss

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic splenectomy and to investigate the learning curve of laparoscopic splenectomy. METHODS: Forty cases of laparoscopic splenectomy (performed by W.Y. between September 2008 and August 2010) in our general surgery department were reviewed, and the cases were divided equally into 4 groups (group I, II, III, IV) according the time sequence of the operations. The operating time, blood loss, conversion to open surgery, conversion to hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative liquid diet recovery time, intra- and postoperative complications and the operative frequency were compared. RESULTS: There were no statistical differences among the groups in age and gender (P>0.05). The operating time, blood loss and postoperative hospital stay of groups III and IV were significantly less than those of groups I and II (P<0 .05). Postoperative liquid diet recovery time appear to show a gradual shortening trend from Group I to Group IV, but the differences were not at standard statistical thresholds (P>0.05). Frequency of conversion to open surgery, of conversion to hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy, of complications among the four groups were also not statistically different (P>0.05). The operative frequency of group I-IV increased from 1.25/month to 2.5/month. CONCLUSION The learning curve of laparoscopic splenectomy for surgeon who was experienced in open splenectomy and laparoscope cholecystectomy is approximately 20 cases, and the operative frequency is about 1.33/month.
Adult ; Aged ; Blood Loss, Surgical ; statistics & numerical data ; China ; epidemiology ; Female ; Humans ; Intraoperative Complications ; epidemiology ; Laparoscopy ; methods ; Learning Curve ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Splenectomy ; methods ; Young Adult