BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is a multidimensional and multidisciplinary evaluation and management process to identify and address the needs of an older person (OP). However, there are several challenges faced in its implementation which limit its full potential and utility to promote healthy aging. This paper aimed to describe the issues and challenges of those involved in the conduct of the traditional paper-based CGA, specifically older persons and the research and health facility-based assessors.

This is a descriptive convergent parallel mixed-methods study utilizing both quantitative and qualitative data from the UP Manila Wellness Initiative for Seniors and Elders research program. Mixed methods of data collection were conducted online, namely survey and focus group discussions (FGD). Purposively recruited OPs aged 60 years and above who previously underwent CGA served as online survey respondents. Similarly, purposively recruited healthcare professionals (HCP) who conduct research-based and facility-based CGA participated in the FGDs. STATA and NVivo PRO Plus were used to analyze the quantitative and qualitative data, respectively. Descriptive statistics were used namely frequencies, percentages, mean, standard deviation, and median. Guided by the interpretivist paradigm, thematic analysis was conducted. Triangulation of results was done by the multidisciplinary team.

A total of 30 OPs with mean age of 67.1 years (SD±5.7) responded to the online survey. A total of 10 healthcare professionals, mostly geriatricians, participated in two separate FGDs.

Most (83%) liked the comprehesiveness of the CGA. However, OPs had difficulties with the following: follow-ups (43%), sensitive questions (40%), and recall (23%). Thirty percent (30%) rated the CGA as long to too long. HCP assessors’ challenges were related to the participants/patients, assessors, and operational factors. Participant/ patient-related factors include health conditions, follow-up issues, language, sensory impairment, and familiarity with the tools. Assessors-related factors include competency, missing information, illegible handwriting, and asking sensitive questions. Operations-related factors include the length of the questionnaire and process, physical set up, fragmented system, data storage and protection, and inadequate human resource.

The common issues and challenges identified by the older persons and healthcare professional assessors in the conduct of paper-based CGA include the length of the CGA, sensitive questions, and follow-up issues. Addressing these issues and challenges is necessary to maximize the utility of the comprehensive geriatric assessment in promoting healthy aging. With the advent of technology, digitizing the paper-based CGA is a promising approach to address these challenges.

INTRODUCTION: The diagnosis of sarcopenia relies on key indicators such as handgrip strength, walking speed and muscle mass. Developing a composite index that integrates these measures could enhance clinical evaluation in older adults. This study aimed to standardise and combine these metrics to establish a z score for the sarcopenia composite index (ZoSCI) tailored for the ageing population. Additionally, we explore the risk factors associated with ZoSCI to provide insights into early prevention and intervention strategies. METHOD: This retrospective study analysed data between January 2017 and December 2021 from an elderly health programme in Taiwan, applying the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia criteria to assess sarcopenia. ZoSCI was developed by standardising handgrip strength, walking speed and muscle mass into z scores and integrating them into a composite index. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine optimal cut-off values, and multiple regression analysis identified factors influencing ZoSCI. RESULTS: Among the 5047 participants, the prevalence of sarcopenia was 3.7%, lower than the reported global prevalence of 3.9-15.4%. ROC curve analysis established optimal cut-off points for distinguishing sarcopenia in ZoSCI: -1.85 (sensitivity 0.91, specificity 0.88) for males and -1.97 (sensitivity 0.93, specificity 0.88) for females. Factors associated with lower ZoSCI included advanced age, lower education levels, reduced exercise frequency, lower body mass index and creatinine levels. CONCLUSION This study introduces ZoSCI, a new compo-site quantitative indicator for identifying sarcopenia in older adults. The findings highlight specific risk factors that can inform early intervention. Future studies should validate ZoSCI globally, with international collaborations to ensure broader applicability.
Humans ; Sarcopenia/physiopathology* ; Male ; Aged ; Female ; Retrospective Studies ; Hand Strength ; Taiwan/epidemiology* ; ROC Curve ; Aged, 80 and over ; Risk Factors ; Walking Speed ; Geriatric Assessment/methods* ; Prevalence ; Muscle, Skeletal ; Middle Aged

OBJECTIVE: To explore the relationship between the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) and cognitive function. METHODS: A cross-sectional study method was conducted. People aged ≥ 60 years from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) databases from 1999 to 2002 and 2011 to 2014 were included as study subjects. The participants were divided into three groups based on their GNRI scores: a medium-high risk group (82 ≤ GNRI < 92), a low risk group (92 ≤ GNRI < 98), and a no-risk group (GNRI ≥ 98). Demographic characteristics (gender, age, race, education), chronic diseases [chronic bronchitis, emphysema, thyroid problems, coronary heart disease, angina pectoris, stroke, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and depression score on the patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9)], lifestyle habits (history of smoking, hours of sleep), etc., were collected. Cognitive function was assessed using the consortium to establish a registry for Alzheimer's disease word learning subtest (CERAD-WL), animal fluency test (AFT), and digit symbol substitution test (DSST) for the 2011-2014 data, while only the DSST was used for the 1999-2002 data. Differences in the above information among the GNRI cohorts were compared. Factors affecting cognitive function in the population were analyzed using multifactorial Logistic regression. RESULTS: 2 653 participants from 2011 to 2014 and 2 380 participants from 1999 to 2002 were enrolled, with a total of 5 033 participants in the study. There were statistically significant differences in age, stroke, diabetes mellitus, DSST score, AFT score, CERAD score test 1 recall (Cst1), and CERAD score test 2 recall (Cst2) among the GNRI groups. Multifactorial Logistic regression analysis of data from 2011 to 2014 showed that in model 3 (DSST score, age, gender, race, marriage, education, hours of sleep, history of smoking, emphysema, thyroid problems, chronic bronchitis, coronary heart disease, angina pectoris, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, depression score on the PHQ-9, and stroke) adjusted for all covariates, GNRI was a protective factor for DSST [odds ratio (OR) = 1.03, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was 1.00 to 1.05, P = 0.03]; Logistic regression analyse for 1999 to 2002 and 2011 to 2014 showed a significant association even after adjustment for covariates (OR = 1.02, 95%CI was 1.00 to 1.03, P = 0.02). Subgroup Logistic regression analyses of the total population from 2011 to 2014 showed a significant association between GNRI and DSST scores (OR = 1.02, 95%CI was 1.01 to 1.03, P < 0.001), with significant associations in the age subgroups of 60 to 64 years old, across gender, non-Hispanic Whites and Blacks, by education, and by marital status associations were significant (all P < 0.05). Subgroup Logistic regression analyse of the total populations from 1999 to 2002 and 2011 to 2014 showed a significant association between the GNRI and DSST score (OR = 1.01, 95%CI was 1.01 to 1.02, P < 0.001), but did not show a significant year difference (interaction P = 0.503), and the newly found in the smoking population the association was also more significant (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION The GNRI correlates with the presence of cognitive functions related to processing speed, sustained attention, and executive function, and may be able to serve as an indicator for the assessment or prediction of related cognitive functions.
Humans ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Aged ; Middle Aged ; Nutrition Surveys ; Cognition ; Female ; Male ; Nutritional Status ; Risk Factors ; Geriatric Assessment

Background and Objectives: The comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is a multidimensional and multidisciplinary evaluation and management process to identify and address the needs of an older person (OP). However, there are several challenges faced in its implementation which limit its full potential and utility to promote healthy aging. This paper aimed to describe the issues and challenges of those involved in the conduct of the traditional paper-based CGA, specifically older persons and the research and health facility-based assessors. Methods: This is a descriptive convergent parallel mixed-methods study utilizing both quantitative and qualitative data from the UP Manila Wellness Initiative for Seniors and Elders research program. Mixed methods of data collection were conducted online, namely survey and focus group discussions (FGD). Purposively recruited OPs aged 60 years and above who previously underwent CGA served as online survey respondents. Similarly, purposively recruited healthcare professionals (HCP) who conduct research-based and facility-based CGA participated in the FGDs. STATA and NVivo PRO Plus were used to analyze the quantitative and qualitative data, respectively. Descriptive statistics were used namely frequencies, percentages, mean, standard deviation, and median. Guided by the interpretivist paradigm, thematic analysis was conducted. Triangulation of results was done by the multidisciplinary team. Results: A total of 30 OPs with mean age of 67.1 years (SD±5.7) responded to the online survey. A total of 10 healthcare professionals, mostly geriatricians, participated in two separate FGDs. : Most (83%) liked the comprehesiveness of the CGA. However, OPs had difficulties with the following: follow-ups (43%), sensitive questions (40%), and recall (23%). Thirty percent (30%) rated the CGA as long to too long. HCP assessors’ challenges were related to the participants/patients, assessors, and operational factors. Participant/ patient-related factors include health conditions, follow-up issues, language, sensory impairment, and familiarity with the tools. Assessors-related factors include competency, missing information, illegible handwriting, and asking sensitive questions. Operations-related factors include the length of the questionnaire and process, physical set up, fragmented system, data storage and protection, and inadequate human resource. Conclusion The common issues and challenges identified by the older persons and healthcare professional assessors in the conduct of paper-based CGA include the length of the CGA, sensitive questions, and follow-up issues. Addressing these issues and challenges is necessary to maximize the utility of the comprehensive geriatric assessment in promoting healthy aging. With the advent of technology, digitizing the paper-based CGA is a promising approach to address these challenges.
geriatric assessment ; Philippines

INTRODUCTION: Our aim was to study the prevalence of frailty and its associated factors in a subacute geriatric ward. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of 167 participants between June 2018 and June 2019. Baseline demographics and participants' Mini Nutritional Assessment, Geriatric Depression Scale, Mini Mental State Examination, Charlson's Comorbidity Index and LACE index scores were obtained. Functional measurements such as modified Barthel's Index scores and hand grip strength (HGS) were taken. Frailty was assessed using the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and the FRAIL scale. Data on history of healthcare utilisation, medications, length of stay, selected blood investigations and presence of geriatric syndromes were also collected. RESULTS: The prevalence of pre-frailty (CFS 4) and frailty (CFS ≥ 5) was 16.2% and 63.4%, respectively. There were significant associations between CFS and age (pre-frail vs. non-frail: odds ratio [OR] 1.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.25, P = 0.006; frail vs. non-frail: OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.01-1.15, P = 0.021), HGS at discharge (frail vs. non-frail: OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82-0.99, P = 0.025), serum albumin (frail vs. non-frail: OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82-0.99, P = 0.035) and the presence of urinary incontinence (frail vs. non-frail: OR 3.03, 95% CI 1.19-7.77, P = 0.021). CONCLUSION Frailty is highly prevalent in the subacute geriatric setting and has many associated factors. In this study, independent factors associated with frailty were age, HGS at discharge, serum albumin and urinary incontinence. This has implications for future resource allocation for frail older inpatients and may help direct further research to study the effectiveness of frailty-targeted interventions.
Humans ; Aged ; Frailty/epidemiology* ; Frail Elderly ; Hand Strength ; Prevalence ; Singapore/epidemiology* ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic ; Geriatric Assessment ; Urinary Incontinence ; Serum Albumin

Geriatric falls presenting to the emergency department (ED) are rising due to our rapidly ageing population. As part of a group of geriatric-focused emergency medicine practitioners, we describe a multidisciplinary falls prevention tool using the acronym.
Accidental Falls/prevention & control* ; Aged ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Geriatric Assessment ; Humans

Objectives: 1) To describe the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of working and retired employees aged 55 years and older; 2) To determine the proportion with visual and hearing impairments in participants with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM); and 3) To determine the association between quality of life in participants with T2DM and visual and hearing impairments.

Methods: The study utilized a cross-sectional study design - data derived from the findings of the UP Wellness Initiative for Seniors and Elders (UPWISE) Program. The participants were working and retired university employees age 55 years and above residing in urban and rural-urban (rurban) communities. Stratified random sampling was utilized according to working status and sex. Visual and hearing impairments, and the presence of T2DM were assessed using a multidisciplinary diagnostic process, the comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA).

Results: A total of 301 participants agreed to participate and completed the CGA. The mean age of the participants was 64.8 (±6.3), and 51.2% belonged to the young-old subgroup. There was an almost equal proportion of males and females while there were more working (53.8%) than the retired (46.2%). There were 17.6% of participants with T2DM and of them, 47.2% with visual impairment (VI) alone, 7.5% hearing impairment (HI) alone, and 37.7% with dual sensory impairments (DSI). Good quality of life was reported by 100% of T2DM participants with HI, 80% with VI, and 72.3% with DSI. There was no significant association between quality of life and vision and hearing impairments. On the other hand, a significant association was identified between T2DM and DSI (p-value, 0.001).

Conclusion: T2DM and vision and hearing impairments are prevalent among the two academic communities. Visual impairment was more common than hearing impairment. Participants diagnosed with T2DM and having a visual, hearing, or dual sensory impairments reported good quality of life.

Key Words: sensory, geriatric assessments, retired, employees, quality of life, diabetes mellitus

Objective: To understand the transition rules of cognitive frailty and its influencing factors in the elderly in China and provide evidence for the early intervention of cognitive frailty. Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study with 3 round consecutive survey (2011, 2013, 2015) and the state of the subjects were classified into four categories: robust-normal cognitive, cognitive impairment, physical frailty, and cognitive frailty. A multi-state Markov model was established to explore the transition rules of cognitive frailty and its influencing factors. Results: A total of 3 470 older adults were included, and 350 (10.09%) had cognitive frailty at baseline. After two years, the probability of cognitive frailty in the cognitive impairment population was higher than that in people with physical frailty (31.6% vs. 7.6%). Persons with cognitive frailty were more likely to become physical frailty (29.7% vs. 15.6%). Being women (HR=1.599, 95%CI: 1.058-2.417), comorbidity (HR=3.035, 95%CI: 1.090-8.450), and depression (HR=1.678, 95%CI: 1.153-2.441) were the risk factors associated with cognitive frailty in the elderly, while being educated (HR=2.367, 95%CI: 1.567-3.575) was a protective factor for the transition of cognitive frailty to physical frailty. Conclusions: The prevalence of cognitive frailty is relatively high in the elderly in China. Those with cognitive impairment have a higher probability of cognitive frailty. Gender, education level, comorbidity, and depression are the main influencing factors for the occurrence and transition of cognitive frailty.
Aged ; China/epidemiology* ; Cognition ; Cognitive Dysfunction/epidemiology* ; Female ; Frail Elderly ; Frailty/epidemiology* ; Geriatric Assessment ; Humans ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Retrospective Studies

INTRODUCTION: Frailty is associated with adverse health outcomes and can be measured using the FRAIL scale. In Singapore, its use has been studied in tertiary hospitals but not in community hospitals. A tool to predict rehabilitation outcomes would allow for better risk stratification and allocation of resources. We aimed to determine whether the FRAIL scale is associated with rehabilitation outcomes in patients admitted to the community hospital setting, where post-acute care and rehabilitation are primarily delivered. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. The FRAIL scale was utilised to screen 560 older adults who were admitted to a community hospital for rehabilitation. Data were analysed to determine the relationship between baseline characteristics and frailty status, with rehabilitation outcome measures of absolute functional gain, rehabilitation effectiveness, rehabilitation efficiency, length of stay and discharge destination. RESULTS: The combined score of the FRAIL scale showed significant negative association with absolute functional gain (P < 0.001), rehabilitation effectiveness (P < 0.001) and rehabilitation efficiency (P < 0.001), whereas it was positively associated with increased length of stay (P < 0.05) and a need for continued support in increased care settings (P < 0.001). Individual components of the FRAIL scale, in particular, the 'fatigue', 'ambulation' and 'loss of weight' components, appeared to be highly associated with rehabilitation effectiveness and efficiency, especially among pre-frail patients. CONCLUSION The utility of the FRAIL scale as an indicator of frailty status and its association with rehabilitative outcomes in the post-acute care setting were demonstrated. Moreover, the FRAIL scale may better predict the rehabilitative progress of pre-frail patients.
Humans ; Aged ; Frailty/diagnosis* ; Frail Elderly ; Geriatric Assessment ; Hospitals, Community ; Retrospective Studies ; Length of Stay ; Cohort Studies ; Treatment Outcome

Objective To evaluate the application value of abbreviated comprehensive geriatric assessment(aCGA)in elderly female breast cancer patients. Methods Eight aspects of the traditional CGA were simplified to form the aCGA assessment table,based on which the patients were classified into three grades of A,B and C according to the total scores.This study enrolled the elderly female patients with breast cancer aged 70 years and above who were treated in PUMC Hospital from June 2018 to January 2020.Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group(ECOG)scoring and aCGA grading were performed respectively,and the results of the two methods were compared. Results Of the 162 patients,111(68.5%)were classified by the aGGA method as grade A,43(26.5%)as grade B,and 8(5.0%)as grade C;131(80.9%)cases have concurrent diseases,and the most common complications were hypertension(
Aged ; Breast Neoplasms ; Female ; Geriatric Assessment ; Humans