Background:Laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) is increasingly performed in patients with gastric cancer. However, the usage of intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy (IEJ) following LTG is limited, as the safety and efficacy remain unclear. The present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of IEJ following LTG.

Methods:Studies published from January 1994 to January 2017 comparing the outcomes of IEJ and extracorporeal esophagojejunostomy (EEJ) following LTG were reviewed and collected from the PubMed, EBSCO, Cochrane Library, Embase, and China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI). Operative results, postoperative recovery, and postoperative complications were compared and analyzed. The weighted mean difference (WMD) and odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using the Review Manager 5.3.

Results:Seven nonrandomized studies with 785 patients were included. Compared with EEJ, IEJ has less blood loss (WMD: -13.52 ml; 95% CI: -24.82--2.22; P = 0.02), earlier time to first oral intake (WMD: -0.49 day; 95% CI: -0.83--0.14; P < 0.01), and shorter length of hospitalization (WMD: -0.62 day; 95% CI: -1.08--0.16; P < 0.01). There was no significant difference between IEJ and EEJ regarding the operation time, anastomotic time, number of retrieved lymph nodes, time to first flatus, anastomosis leakage rate, anastomosis stenosis rate, and proximal resections (all P > 0.05).

ConclusionsCompared with EEJ, IEJ has better cosmesis, milder surgical trauma, and a faster postoperative recovery. IEJ can be performed as safely as EEJ. IEJ should be encouraged to surgeons with sufficient expertise.

Esophagostomy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Esophagus ; surgery ; Gastrectomy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Humans ; Jejunostomy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Laparoscopy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Stomach Neoplasms ; surgery ; Treatment Outcome

In recent years, laparoscopic gastrectomy has developed rapidly for both early and advanced gastric cancer. Most studies showed that the operative complication rate is comparable between laparoscopic and open surgery. The common complications related to laparoscopic gastrectomy are anastomotic leakage, stenosis, intra-abdominal bleeding, pancreatic leakage, bowel obstruction, etc. This article provides insights into the reasons, classification, management, and prevention of the complications related to laparoscopic gastrectomy.
Gastrectomy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; adverse effects ; Postoperative Complications ; therapy ; Stomach Neoplasms ; surgery

Gastric cancer is one of the most common gastrointestinal malignancies in China. D2 radical gastrectomy is the main treatment for advanced gastric cancer patients. With the advancement of laparoscopic technology, laparoscopic radical gastrectomy has been gradually developed in the world, and even popularized in China. There have been a lot of literature reports on the indications, the scope of lymph node dissection and the improvement of techniques of laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Relevant guidelines or consensus for radical gastrectomy. The prevention and treatment of complications of gastrointestinal reconstruction for laparoscopic radical gastric cancer surgery is a major concern for gastrointestinal surgeons. Once complications occur in digestive tract reconstruction, it would increase the hospitalization cost, prolong the hospitalization stay of patients, delay follow-up chemotherapy, and even lead to postoperative death or other serious consequences. Therefore, it is of positive and far-reaching clinical significance to pay attention to the techniques of gastrointestinal reconstruction after laparoscopic radical gastric cancer surgery, to reduce the occurrence of gastrointestinal reconstruction complications, and to detect and reasonably manage related complications in a timely manner. The Chinese expert consensus on prevention and treatment of complications related to digestive tract reconstruction after laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer (2022 edition) has significance value for reducing the occurrence of gastrointestinal reconstruction complications. This manuscript mainly serves as the interpretation and supplement of this Consensus.
Humans ; Consensus ; Gastrectomy/methods* ; Laparoscopy/adverse effects* ; Lymph Node Excision ; Retrospective Studies ; Stomach Neoplasms/pathology* ; China

Radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer results in various post-operative complications, and the influencing factors are complicated. The diagnosis, treatment and prevention of common complications have been reported in many literatures. However, there are few reports on the prevention and treatment of rare complications. Rare complications after radical gastrectomy are often overlooked due to their low incidence. In addition, there are few guidelines and expert consensus regarding to the rare complications. Therefore, clinicians may lack experience in the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of rare complications after radical gastrectomy. Based on the literature review and the author's experience, this article systematically reviews seven rare complications after radical gastrectomy (duodenal stump fistula, pancreatic fistula, chyle leakage, esophagomediastinal fistula, internal hernia, gastroparesis, and intussusception). This article aims to provide a comprehensive reference for the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of rare complications after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients.
Humans ; Stomach Neoplasms/complications* ; Gastrectomy/methods* ; Postoperative Complications/etiology* ; Duodenal Diseases ; Laparoscopy/adverse effects* ; Retrospective Studies

Gastric cancer is a common digestive system malignancy. Surgical operation is the main treatment of radical treatment for gastric cancer. Pulmonary infection is a common postoperative complication of gastric cancer. Because there is no clear and unified definition of pulmonary complications, the current researches show that the incidence of postoperative pulmonary infection of gastric cancer is about 1.8%-18.1%. The incidence of postoperative pulmonary infection will prolong the hospital stay, increase the cost of hospitalization, and even develop into respiratory failure leading to early postoperative death. There are many factors affecting postoperative pulmonary infection of gastric cancer, including age, smoking history, pulmonary function, pulmonary disease history, operation method, operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, gastric tube retention time, postoperative lying time and so on. There are also many perioperative interventions. This article reviews the risk factors and perioperative interventions of postoperative pulmonary infection of gastric cancer.
Gastrectomy/adverse effects* ; Humans ; Perioperative Care/methods* ; Pneumonia/therapy* ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Stomach Neoplasms/surgery*

Surgery is the main curative treatment for gastric cancer. As surgical techniques continue to improve, the scope of radical resection and lymph node dissection has formed consensus and guidelines, so people's attention has gradually shifted to the quality of life (QOL) of patients after surgery. Postgastrectomy syndrome is a series of symptoms and signs caused by complications after gastrectomy, which can affect the quality of life of patients with gastric cancer after surgery. Gastrectomy and anastomosis are closely related to postgastrectomy syndrome. The selection of appropriate surgical methods is very important to the quality of life of patients after surgery. This article reviews the effects of gastrectomy procedures on postoperative quality of life of patients with gastric cancer and its evaluation methods.
Gastrectomy/methods* ; Humans ; Lymph Node Excision/adverse effects* ; Postgastrectomy Syndromes ; Quality of Life ; Stomach Neoplasms/complications*

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of endoscopic dilation for benign anastomotic stricture after radical gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients. METHODS: Gastric cancer patients who underwent endoscopic balloon dilation for benign anastomosis stricture after radical gastrectomy during a 6-year period were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients developed benign strictures at the site of anastomosis. The majority of strictures occurred within 1 year after surgery (95.2%). The median duration to stenosis after surgery was 1.70 months (range, 0.17 to 23.97 months). The success rate of the first endoscopic dilation was 61.9%. Between the restenosis group (n=8) and the no restenosis group (n=13), there were no significant differences in the body mass index (22.82 kg/m2 vs 22.46 kg/m2), interval to symptom onset (73.9 days vs 109.3 days), interval to treatment (84.6 days vs 115.6 days), maximal balloon diameter (14.12 mm vs 15.62 mm), number of balloon dilation sessions (1.75 vs 1.31), location of gastric cancer or type of surgery. One patient required surgery because of stricture refractory to repeated dilation. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic dilation is a highly effective treatment for benign anastomotic strictures after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer and should be considered a primary intervention prior to proceeding with surgical revision.
Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects ; Constriction, Pathologic/etiology/therapy ; Dilatation/*methods ; Female ; Gastrectomy/*adverse effects ; Gastroscopy/*methods ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Recurrence ; Retrospective Studies ; Stomach Neoplasms/*surgery ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the survival, complication and postoperative mortality after D(1) or D(2) lymph node dissection for gastric cancer.

METHODSAll the randomized clinical trials about nodal dissection for gastric cancer published within the last 20 years were collected. Quality assessment was done on each trial and relevant data were extracted from qualified trials. Meta-analysis was performed with the use of RevMan 4.2 (Cochrane) for statistic analysis.

RESULTSThree hundred and ninety-four trials were yielded at the initial search. Four trials, recruited 1316 cases of gastric cancer in total, were included after quality assessment. Results of Meta-analysis showed that standard D(2) dissection could effectively improve patients' long-term survival [RR 1.35, 95%CI(1.12-1.62), NNT=9] as compared with D(1) dissection. If splenectomy (or pancreatico-splenectomy) was involved, D(2) dissection only improved the clinical outcome of T(3)-staged cases [RR 1.80,95%CI(1.03-3.15), NNT=13]. D(2) dissection produced higher rates of postoperative complication [RR 1.72,95%CI(1.46-2.03), NNT=6] and mortality [RR 2.12,95%CI(1.39-3.25), NNT=21] than D(1) dissection.

CONCLUSIONSStandard D(2) dissection can increase the overall survival rate when compared with D(1) dissection. If splenectomy (or pancreatico-splenectomy) cases are involved,D(2) dissection can only improve the survival rate of T(3)-staged patients. D(2) dissection yields higher postoperative morbidity and mortality than D(1) dissection.

Gastrectomy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Humans ; Lymph Node Excision ; adverse effects ; methods ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Stomach Neoplasms ; surgery ; Survival Rate ; Treatment Outcome

With the rapid advancement of minimally invasive new technology, laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery are now regarded as the main direction in surgical treatment for stomach cancers. Recent evidence has confirmed the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for early gastric cancer and advanced gastric cancer. However, gastrointestinal surgeons should pay more attention to complications after laparoscopic gastrectomy because of rich blood supply, complex tissue layers and lymph node metastasis. Common complications related to laparoscopic surgery are associated with laparoscopic instruments and operating, intra-abdominal bleeding, anastomotic leakage, anastomotic bleeding, pancreatic leakage, duodenal stump leakage, lymphatic leakage and so on. This article mainly focuses on the causes, prevention and treatment of the complications after laparoscopic gastrectomy.
Anastomotic Leak ; Duodenal Diseases ; Female ; Gastrectomy ; adverse effects ; instrumentation ; methods ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; adverse effects ; instrumentation ; methods ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Male ; Postoperative Complications ; etiology ; prevention & control ; therapy ; Robotic Surgical Procedures ; adverse effects ; instrumentation ; methods ; Stomach Neoplasms ; complications ; surgery

BACKGROUNDGastric cancer (GC) is the second leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide, and surgical resection is currently the only possible curative approach. Duodenal stump leakage is the most serious complication after radical gastrectomy, and optimal treatment is still lacking.

METHODSWe retrospectively reviewed 2034 cases of total or subtotal gastrectomy for GC from January 1995 to December 2009, including 465 cases of duodenal stump closure using purse-string suture (group A), 835 cases of duodenal stump treated with linear cutting stapler and seromuscular layer suture (group B), and 734 cases of duodenal stump closure using full-thickness and seromuscular layer suture (group C). We evaluated the surgical cost, operative time for duodenal stump closure, short-term postoperative complications, perioperative blood loss, and postoperative recovery.

RESULTSThere was no perioperative mortality in any group. Ninety-four postoperative (within 1 month) complications occurred: 18 abdominal bleeding, 14 anastomotic leakage, 15 abdominal infection, 36 wound infection, and 11 duodenal stump leakage. There was no significant difference among the groups in intra-abdominal hemorrhage, anastomotic leakage, abdominal infection and wound infection. No postoperative duodenal stump leakage occurred in group A, which had a significant difference compared with groups B and C (6 cases in group B and 5 cases in group C suffered duodenal stump leakage. P < 0.01). The surgical cost in groups A and C was significantly lower than in group B (P < 0.01), with no significant difference between groups A and C. The processing time for duodenal stump closure in groups A and B was significantly shorter than in group C (P < 0.01), with no significant difference between groups A and B. There was no significant difference in blood loss and postoperative recovery among the groups.

CONCLUSIONSDuodenal stump closure using purse-string suture seems to be a promising approach with shorter operative time, and lower cost and incidence of duodenal stump leakage in radical gastrectomy.

Aged ; Female ; Gastrectomy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Gastric Stump ; surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications ; surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Sutures