BACKGROUND/AIMS: Despite the development in diagnostic tools, gallbladder carcinoma is often diagnosed at an advanced stage. Therefore, early diagnosis and radical resection are most important factors for the prognosis of gallbladder carcinoma. However, prognostic factors after radical resection of gallbladder carcinoma have not been well identified. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic factors of gallbladder carcinoma after curative resection. METHODS: We reviewed the records of the 115 patients with gallbladder carcinoma who underwent curative surgery between 1989 and 2004 at Yonsei University Medical Center (YUMC). The relationship between survival and clinicopathological variables was assessed. RESULTS: In 311 patients presenting with gallbladder carcinoma, 195 patients (62.5%) were radically resected. Among 195 patients, 80 patients were excluded because of incomplete clinicopathologic data and unsatisfactory follow-up. The 5 year overall survival rate was 36.0%, and disease free 5 year survival rate was 3.9%. Univariate analysis showed that survival was closely related to gross morphology, depth of tumor invasion, lymph node metastasis and preoperative serum CA19-9 level. Three significant factors identified by multivariate analysis were depth of tumor invasion, gross morphology, and preoperative serum CA19-9 level. CONLUSIONS: Depth of tumor invasion, gross morphology, and preoperative serum CA19-9 level are independent significant prognostic factors of resectable gallbladder carcinoma.
Aged ; Carcinoma/mortality/secondary/*surgery ; Female ; Gallbladder Neoplasms/mortality/pathology/*surgery ; Humans ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prognosis ; Survival Rate

BACKGROUNDGallbladder carcinoma (GBC) is a commonly-seen malignancy of the biliary tract characterized by difficult early diagnosis, rapid growth, early metastasis, and poor prognosis. Nearly half of GBC patients also have jaundice, which is a mark of the advanced stage of GBC. The role of radical resection in patients of gallbladder carcinoma with jaundice is still a matter of uncertainty, which we attempted to clarify in this study.

METHODSTotally, 251 GBC patients who received treatment at the Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital (EHBH) from December 2002 to January 2010 were recruited into this study. We divided them into group A (jaundice group, n=117) and group B (non-jaundice group, n=134). Clinical records and follow-up data were collected and retrospectively analyzed in both groups.

RESULTSCompared with group A, patients in group B had a longer median survival time ((6.0±0.5) months vs. (15.0±2.6) months, P<0.01). Even in patients with stage III or stage IV GBC, the median survival time in patients without jaundice (n=111), was still longer than that in patients with jaundice (n=116) (P<0.01). The radical resection rate was lower in group A patients than in group B patients with stage III or stage IV GBC; 31.9% vs. 63.1%. However, the median survival time of patients undergoing radical resection did not show a statistical difference between jaundice patients and non-jaundice patients; (12.0±4.3) months vs. (18.0±3.0) months (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONSGBC with jaundice usually implies advanced stage disease and a poor prognosis for the patients. However, our findings indicate that as long as the patient's condition allows, radical resection is still feasible for GBC patients with jaundice, and may achieve a prognosis close to those GBC patients without jaundice.

Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Carcinoma ; mortality ; pathology ; surgery ; Female ; Gallbladder Neoplasms ; mortality ; pathology ; surgery ; Humans ; Jaundice ; pathology ; Male ; Middle Aged

BACKGROUNDGallbladder carcinoma is rare and associated with dismal outcomes. Radical surgery is the only curative treatment, and options for adjuvant therapy remain limited. This study aimed to determine the factors influencing outcome of treatment in patients with gallbladder carcinoma, and to identify the patients who might benefit from radical surgery and adjuvant therapy.

METHODSMedical records and follow-up histories of 150 patients with gallbladder carcinoma who had undergone surgery between April 1980 and December 2005 were retrospectively reviewed. The factors predictive for the survival of the patients were identified using multivariate analysis.

RESULTSSurgery for gallbladder cancer was associated with an overall 5-year survival rate of 26.2%. After curative resection (40% of the patients), the 5-year survival rate was 60.3%. The patients who underwent R0 resection had a significantly longer median survival (97.3 months) than those who had R1/R2 resection (8.3 months) or only laparotomy (3.7 months) (P < 0.0001). Univariate analysis showed that resectability, American Joint Committee on Cancer staging, tumor grade, adjuvant therapy, jaundice at presentation, depth of tumor invasion, lymph node involvement, distant metastasis, and carcinoembryonic antigen level were statistically significant predictors for survival. Multivariate analysis revealed American Joint Committee on Cancer staging and resectability were independent prognostic factors for survival. The patients who underwent noncurative resection might benefit from adjuvant therapy (median survival, 12.4 months vs 7.2 months, P = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONSFavorable survival rate can be achieved after curative resection, even for selected patients with advanced disease. Adjuvant therapy may improve the survival of patients with gallbladder carcinoma.

Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Female ; Gallbladder Neoplasms ; mortality ; pathology ; surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Prognosis ; Survival Rate

At present, surgical treatment is the only curative option for gallbladder (GB) cancer. Many efforts therefore have been made to improve resectability and the survival rate. However, GB cancer has a low incidence, and no randomized, controlled trials have been conducted to establish the optimal treatment modalities. The present guidelines include recent recommendations based on current understanding and highlight controversial issues that require further research. For T1a GB cancer, the optimal treatment modality is simple cholecystectomy, which can be carried out as either a laparotomy or a laparoscopic surgery. For T1b GB cancer, either simple or an extended cholecystectomy is appropriate. An extended cholecystectomy is generally recommended for patients with GB cancer at stage T2 or above. In extended cholecystectomy, a wedge resection of the GB bed or a segmentectomy IVb/V can be performed and the optimal extent of lymph node dissection should include the cystic duct lymph node, the common bile duct lymph node, the lymph nodes around the hepatoduodenal ligament (the hepatic artery and portal vein lymph nodes), and the posterior superior pancreaticoduodenal lymph node. Depending on patient status and disease severity, surgeons may decide to perform palliative surgeries.
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic/*methods ; Gallbladder Neoplasms/epidemiology/mortality/*surgery ; Humans ; Incidental Findings ; Laparotomy ; Liver Neoplasms/secondary/*surgery ; Lymph Node Excision/*methods ; Lymph Nodes/pathology/surgery ; Lymphatic Metastasis/*pathology ; Survival Rate

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Extended cholecystectomy is generally recommended for patients with T2 gallbladder cancer. However, few studies have assessed the extent of resection relative to T2 gallbladder tumor location. This study analyzed the effects of surgical methods and tumor location on survival outcomes and tumor recurrence in patients with T2 gallbladder cancer. METHODS: Clinicopathological characteristics, extent of resection, survival rates, and recurrence patterns were retrospectively analyzed in 88 patients with pathologically confirmed T2 gallbladder cancer. RESULTS: The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 65.0%. Multivariate analysis showed that lymph node metastasis was the only independent risk factor for poor 5-year disease-free survival rate. Survival outcomes were not associated with tumor location. Survival tended to be better in patients who underwent extended cholecystectomy than in those who underwent simple cholecystectomy. Recurrence rate was not affected by surgical method or tumor location. Systemic recurrence was more frequent than local recurrence without distant recurrence. Gallbladder bed recurrence and liver recurrence were relatively rare, occurring only in patients with liver side tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Extended cholecystectomy is the most appropriate treatment for T2 gallbladder cancer. However, simple cholecystectomy with regional lymph node dissection may be appropriate for patients with serosal side tumors.
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cholecystectomy/*methods/mortality ; Disease-Free Survival ; Female ; Gallbladder/pathology ; *Gallbladder Neoplasms/mortality/pathology/surgery ; Humans ; Lymph Node Excision ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/*etiology/pathology ; Neoplasm Staging ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Survival Rate ; Treatment Outcome