1.The internal jugular vein as an alternative venous access for a revision of a fractured implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead.
Jong Yop PAE ; Yoon Nyun KIM ; Min Young DO ; Hyoung Seob PARK ; Seongwook HAN ; Seung Ho HUR ; Sae Young CHOI
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine 2017;32(2):360-362
No abstract available.
Defibrillators
;
Defibrillators, Implantable*
;
Jugular Veins*
3.The economic burden of hospitalization for cardiac arrhythmias requiring implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and radiofrequency ablation among adult Filipinos—Its clinical and equity implications and budget impact analysis of proposed revised PhilHealth case rates for cardioverter-defibrillator implantation and radiofrequency ablation
Bernadette A. Tumanan-Mendoza ; Victor L. Mendoza ; Eden A. Gabriel ; Giselle G. Gervacio ; Erdie C. Fadreguilan ; Michael-Joseph F. Agbayani ; Gladys Ruth S. David ; Luigi Pierre S. Segundo ; Carlos E. De Las Llagas ; Magdalena J. Lagamayo ; Felix Eduardo R. Punzalan ; April Ann A. Bermudez-delos Santos ; Noemi S. Pestañ ; o
Philippine Journal of Cardiology 2021;49(1):30-38
BACKGROUND:
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is the recommended treatment of choice for supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), whereas implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is recommended for patients at high risk for sudden death due to ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation. Radiofrequency ablation has been proven to improve the quality of life of patients with SVT, whereas an ICD has been shown to reduce mortality among patients at risk for sudden cardiac death. Both procedures are expensive and usually beyond the reach of the average Filipino patient.
OBJECTIVES:
The objectives are to (1) determine the cost of hospitalization for cardiac arrhythmias that require RFA and cardioverter-defibrillator implantation in the Philippines, (2) propose revised Philippine Health Insurance Corporation (PhilHealth) benefit packages for both procedures, and (3) determine the budget impact of the proposed revised packages.
METHODS:
Hospitalization costs were obtained for both RFA and cardioverter-defibrillator implantation from two government tertiary care hospitals. A range of hospitalization costs involving possible lower and higher cost scenarios was estimated. Based on these estimates and the yearly number of arrhythmias that require these procedures, revised benefit packages for both RFA and cardioverter-defibrillator implantation were proposed to PhilHealth. The budget impact analysis for the first 3 and 5 years of implementation of these revised packages was subsequently calculated.
RESULTS:
The estimated hospitalization costs for RFA ranged from Philippine pesos (PHP) 248,485 to 310,480, whereas for cardioverter-defibrillator implantation, the costs ranged from PHP 509,122 to 581,940. These amounts are greatly disparate from the present PhilHealth coverages, which are PHP 9700 and 18,000 for RFA and cardioverter-defibrillator implantation, respectively. Based on these hospitalization costs, the proposed RFA benefit package is PHP 275,000 to 310,000, whereas for an ICD benefit package, PHP 513,000 to 576,000 is proposed. The incremental cost of more than PHP 300 million for RFA and more than PHP 700 million for an ICD is distributed for the next 3 or 5 years of implementation for these benefit packages, respectively.
CONCLUSION
The present PhilHealth case rates for both RFA and cardioverter-defibrillator implantation are greatly underestimated, which probably is the reason for their underutilization. There is a need to revise these case rates with due consideration of their actual hospitalization costs to lessen inequity in accessing these procedures.
Radiofrequency Ablation
;
Defibrillators, Implantable
4.Epidemiologic burden of hospitalization for cardiac arrhythmias requiring implantable cardioverter-defibrillator among adult Filipinos
Felix Eduardo R. Punzalan ; Erdie C. Fadreguilan ; Victor L. Mendoza ; April Ann A. Bermudez-delos Santos ; Noemi S. Pestañ ; o ; Eden A. Gabriel ; Giselle G. Gervacio ; Michael-Joseph M. Agbayani ; Gladys Ruth S. David ; Luigi Pierre S. Segundo ; Carlos E. De Las Llagas ; Magdalena J. Lagamayo ; Bernadette A. Tumanan-Mendoza
Philippine Journal of Cardiology 2021;49(1):8-13
BACKGROUND:
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is the therapy of choice in the prevention of SCD. The ICD has been proven to improve survival among survivors of cardiac arrest, patients who are at risk of having one because of myocardial scarring and low left ventricular ejection fraction, and those with primary inherited arrhythmia syndromes. The insertion of an ICD is indicated for survivors of cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation or hemodynamically unstable sustained ventricular tachycardia after the exclusion of any reversible cause. At present, there are no nationwide data regarding the prevalence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias requiring an ICD.
OBJECTIVES:
The aim of this study was to determine the (1) total hospitalization claims per year (2017 and 2018) for arrhythmias requiring an ICD, (2) total number of cardioverter-defibrillator insertions done for patients mentioned in (1), (3) prevalence of hospitalization for cardiac arrhythmias requiring insertion of ICD among patients admitted for medical conditions for 2017 and 2018, (4) the demographic profile of patients who were hospitalized for cardiac arrhythmias requiring insertion of ICD, (5) type of facilities (primary, secondary, or tertiary; government or private) where the patients were confined, and (6) duration of hospitalization and mortality rate of patients admitted for the above conditions.
METHODS:
This is a descriptive study using the database of Philippine Health Insurance Corporation (PhilHealth) on hospital claims of admitted patients 19 years or older in PhilHealth-accredited hospitals from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2018. Anonymized records were reviewed using the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) of the World Health Organization. The codes relevant to the study question were chosen and used. The PhilHealth Relative Value Scale (RVS) codes were used to determine the procedures that the patients underwent for their cardiac arrhythmias. Patients’ demographic profile, diagnosis, region, hospitalization stay and status on discharge, and type of facility of admission were collected. Descriptive statistics using median value and interquartile range for quantitative data and frequency and percentage for categorical data were reported.
RESULTS:
In 2017 and 2018, among patients 19 years or older, there were 1282 and 1480 claims of cases of cardiac arrhythmias requiring an ICD (based on ICD-10 codes), whereas those who underwent placement of an ICD (based on RVS codes) numbered 50 and 45, respectively. The prevalence of hospitalization for cardiac arrhythmias related to ICD among patients who were admitted for medical conditions was 0.05% and 0.06%, for the same years. The overall in-hospital mortality rates were 10.84% and 9.46% in each year for those who were admitted for cardiac arrhythmias that required an ICD; however, there were no recorded mortalities for those who underwent implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator. For patients with arrhythmias requiring an ICD (based on ICD-10 and RVS codes), the median (first quartile [Q1], third quartile [Q3]) age was 59 (43, 72) years. In 2018, the median (Q1, Q3) age was 57 (38, 71) years. There were similar proportions of males (53%) and females (47%) in both years. The majority of cases based on ICD-10 codes of cardiac arrhythmias requiring an ICD were confined in government hospitals, whereas most of the claims for procedures based on RVS codes were in private hospitals. Most of the procedures were done in the National Capital Region. The duration of hospitalization was 3 to 4 days.
CONCLUSION
Based on PhilHealth claims, the admission due to cardiac arrhythmias requiring ICD is common in both private and government hospitals. Cardioverter-defibrillator implantation is being done mostly in the National Capital Region and private hospitals. There is a wide gap between the prevalence of cardiac arrhythmias requiring an ICD and the frequency of implantation of the lifesaving device.
implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
;
Defibrillators, Implantable
;
Death, Sudden, Cardiac
;
Brugada Syndrome
6.Delayed Perforation of the Right Ventricular Wall by a Single Standard-Caliber Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Lead Detected by Multidetector Computed Tomography.
An YOSHIMORI ; Atsushi KOBORI ; Nasu MICHIHIRO ; Yutaka FURUKAWA
Korean Circulation Journal 2011;41(11):689-691
We present an unusual case of a delayed right ventricular perforation by a single standard-caliber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead, which manifested 14 days after implantation. Multidetector computed tomography could clearly display the lead perforation, and allow for identification of the associated sequelae such as pericardial effusion and planning the lead extraction strategy.
Defibrillators, Implantable
;
Multidetector Computed Tomography
;
Pericardial Effusion
9.T-wave oversensing and inappropriate shocks in implantable cardioverter defibrillators.
Lei GAO ; Cai-yi LU ; Shi-wen WANG ; Qiao XUE ; Wei YAN ; Sheng-hua ZHOU ; Rui CHEN ; Peng LIU ; Jin-yue ZHAI
Chinese Medical Journal 2010;123(9):1222-1224