OBJECTIVE: To investigate the difference of effectiveness between medial-lateral approach and posteromedian approach in the release of elbow stiffness after distal humeral fracture surgery. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 41 patients with elbow stiffness following medial and lateral plate fixation for distal humeral fractures, admitted between January 2021 and June 2023 and meeting selection criteria. Patients were divided into the medial-lateral approach release group (study group, 20 cases) and the posteromedian approach release group (control group, 21 cases) based on surgical approach. Baseline data including age, gender, affected side, body mass index, disease duration, and preoperative extension angle, flexion angle, range of motion, visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, Mayo elbow performance score, ulnar nerve symptoms, and heterotopic ossification showed no significant difference between groups ( P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and complication incidence were recorded and compared between groups. Clinical effectiveness was evaluated using pre- and postoperative Mayo score, VAS score, elbow extension/flexion angles, and range of motion on the affected side. Statistical analysis focused on changes in these indicators relative to preoperative values. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in operation time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups ( P>0.05). Patients in both groups were followed up 15-36 months, with a mean of 23.8 months; there was no significant difference in the follow-up time between the two groups ( t=-1.542, P=0.131). In the control group, 1 patient had obvious subcutaneous hematoma and 5 patients had poor wound healing within 2 months after operation, all of which were cured by symptomatic treatment, while no related complications occurred in the study group, there was a significant difference in poor wound healing incidence between the two groups ( P<0.05). At last follow-up, 2 patients in the study group and 3 patients in the control group had mild symptoms of ulnar nerve numbness, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of ulnar nerve symptoms ( P>0.05). All patients had no recurrence or new onset of heterotopic ossification, no skin necrosis or reoperation due to complications. At last follow-up, elbow extension angle, flexion angle, flexion-extension range of motion, VAS score, and Mayo score significantly improved in both groups when compared with the preoperative ones ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the change values in elbow extension angle and VAS score between the two groups ( P>0.05); the change values in flexion angle, range of motion, and Mayo score in the study group were significantly better than those in the control group ( P<0.05). CONCLUSION The medial-lateral approach can release the elbow stiffness and concurrently remove the medial, lateral, or posterior lateral plates. The incision minimizes disruption to rehabilitation exercises and reduces complications like inadequate wound healing, ultimately leading to improved treatment outcomes.
Humans ; Humeral Fractures/surgery* ; Male ; Female ; Retrospective Studies ; Elbow Joint/physiopathology* ; Middle Aged ; Fracture Fixation, Internal/adverse effects* ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Adult ; Bone Plates ; Postoperative Complications/surgery* ; Treatment Outcome ; Aged ; Humeral Fractures, Distal

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of dynamic fixation and plate augmentation combined with bone grafting for femoral nonunion after interlocking intramedullary nails. METHODS: Between January 2008 and December 2022, a total of 128 patients who developed femoral nonunion following static fixation with interlocking intramedullary nailing were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent either dynamic intramedullary nail fixation or plate fixation with bone grafting while retaining the original intramedullary nail. There were 104 males and 24 females;the age ranged from 19 to 59 years old with an average of(32.70±9.21) years old. Patients were categorized into dynamization group and plate group based on the distinct treatment modalities. There were 67 patients in the dynamization group, comprising 54 males and 13 females. The age range was from 19 to 58 years old, with a mean age of (32.68±9.33) years old. All patients underwent open reduction and anterograde interlocking intramedullary nail fixation. Dynamic fixation was implemented between 10 and 28 months postoperatively.The plate group comprised 61 patients, of whom 50 were male and 11 were female. The age distribution ranged from 20 to 59 years old, with a mean age of (32.84±9.07) years old. All patients underwent open reduction and anterograde interlocking intramedullary nailing. Plate reinforcement fixation was performed between 10 and 30 months postoperatively. The incision length, duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization period, fracture healing status, and incidence of complications were compared between the two groups of patients. RESULTS: All patients were followed up for a minimum duration of 1 year. The mean follow-up period for the dynamization group was(26.12±11.82) months, compared to (26.57±12.48) months for the plate group. No statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups (P>0.05). The incision size (2.73±1.21) cm, operation time (22.73±3.20) min and blood loss (19.06±6.22) ml in the dynamization group were significantly less than those in the plate group(22.53±2.24) cm, (126.40±13.91) min and(237.36±81.56) ml, respectively(P<0.05). All nonunion in the plate group were successfully healed, and the healing time duration ranged from 4 to 7 months with an average of(6.16±0.99) months. In the dynamization group, a total of 42 patients achieved fracture healing, with a healing duration ranging from 4 to 8 months with an average of (6.26±1.23) months. There was significant difference in healing rate between 2 groups (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in healing time between 2 groups (P>0.05). The average treatment cost was(17 700.18±4 846.27) yuan in the plate group and (334.24±18.16) yuan in the dynamization group, and there was significant difference in costs between 2 groups (P<0.05). CONCLUSION Either dynamic fixation or plate augmentation combined with bone grafting is an effective method, but dynamic fixation is superior to plate augmentation combined with bone grafting for the treatment of femoral hyperplastic nonunion after interlocking intramedullary nails. Dynamic fixation offers several advantages, including simplified procedures, reduced trauma, and cost-effectiveness in medical expenses, making it superior to additional plate fixation combined with bone grafting. However, dynamic fixation is not suitable for the treatment of femoral atrophic nonunion.
Humans ; Male ; Female ; Adult ; Middle Aged ; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary/adverse effects* ; Femoral Fractures/surgery* ; Fractures, Ununited/surgery* ; Bone Nails ; Retrospective Studies ; Bone Plates ; Young Adult

PURPOSE: To methodically assess the effectiveness of augmentative plating (AP) and exchange nailing (EN) in managing nonunion following intramedullary nailing for long bone fractures of the lower extremity. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched to gather clinical studies regarding the use of AP and EN techniques in the treatment of nonunion following intramedullary nailing of lower extremity long bones. The search was conducted up until May 2023. The original studies underwent an independent assessment of their quality, a process conducted utilizing the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Data were retrieved from these studies, and meta-analysis was executed utilizing Review Manager 5.3. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included 8 studies involving 661 participants, with 305 in the AP group and 356 in the EN group. The results of the meta-analysis demonstrated that the AP group exhibited a higher rate of union (odds ratio: 8.61, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 4.12 - 17.99, p < 0.001), shorter union time (standardized mean difference (SMD): -1.08, 95% CI: -1.79 - -0.37, p = 0.003), reduced duration of the surgical procedure (SMD: -0.56, 95% CI: -0.93 - -0.19, p = 0.003), less bleeding (SMD: -1.5, 95% CI: -2.81 - -0.18, p = 0.03), and a lower incidence of complications (relative risk: -0.17, 95% CI: -0.27 - -0.06, p = 0.001). In the subgroup analysis, the time for union in the AP group in nonisthmal and isthmal nonunion of lower extremity long bones was shorter compared to the EN group (nonisthmal SMD: -1.94, 95% CI: -3.28 - -0.61, p < 0.001; isthmal SMD: -1.08, 95% CI: -1.64 - -0.52, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION In the treatment of nonunion in diaphyseal fractures of the long bones in the lower extremity, the AP approach is superior to EN, both intraoperatively (with reduced duration of the surgical procedure and diminished blood loss) and postoperatively (with an elevated union rate, shorter union time, and lower incidence of complications). Specifically, in the management of nonunion of lower extremity long bones with non-isthmal and isthmal intramedullary nails, AP demonstrated shorter union time in comparison to EN.
Humans ; Bone Nails/adverse effects* ; Bone Plates/adverse effects* ; Femoral Fractures/surgery* ; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary/methods* ; Fractures, Ununited/surgery* ; Lower Extremity/injuries*

OBJECTIVE: To review the advancement made in the understanding of valgus impacted proximal humeral fracture (PHF). METHODS: The domestic and foreign literature about the valgus impacted PHF was extensively reviewed and the definition, classification, pathological features, and treatment of valgus impacted PHFs were summarized. RESULTS: PHF with a neck shaft angle ≥160° is recognized as a valgus impacted PHF characterized by the preservation of the medial epiphyseal region of the humeral head, which contributes to maintenance of the medial periosteum's integrity after fracture and reduces the occurrence of avascular necrosis. Therefore, the valgus impacted PHF has a better prognosis when compared to other complex PHFs. The Neer classification designates it as a three- or four-part fracture, while the AO/Association for the Study of Internal Fixation (AO/ASIF) categorizes it as type C (C1.1). In the management of the valgus impacted PHF, the selection between conservative and surgical approaches is contingent upon the patient's age and the extent of fracture displacement. While conservative treatment offers the advantage of being non-invasive, it is accompanied by limitations such as the inability to achieve anatomical reduction and the potential for multiple complications. Surgical treatment includes open reduction combined with steel wire or locking plate and/or non-absorbable suture, transosseous suture technology, and shoulder replacement. Surgeons must adopt personalized treatment strategies for each patient with a valgus impacted PHF. Minimally invasive surgery helps to preserve blood supply to the humeral head, mitigate the likelihood of avascular necrosis, and reduce postoperative complications of bone and soft tissue. For elderly patients with severe comminuted and displaced fractures, osteoporosis, and unsuitable internal fixation, shoulder joint replacement is the best treatment option. CONCLUSION Currently, there has been some advancement in the classification, vascular supply, and management of valgus impacted PHF. Nevertheless, further research is imperative to assess the clinical safety, biomechanical stability, and indication of minimally invasive technology.
Aged ; Humans ; Bone Plates ; Bone Wires ; Fracture Fixation, Internal/adverse effects* ; Fractures, Comminuted/surgery* ; Humeral Fractures ; Osteonecrosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Shoulder Fractures/surgery* ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of allogeneic femoral head as strut allograft combined with proximal humeral internal locking system (PHILOS) in the treatment of proximal humeral Neer grade Ⅳ fracture with humeral head collapse. METHODS: From January 2018 to November 2020, 18 patients with Neer grade Ⅳ fracture with humeral head collapse were treated with strut allograft with PHILOS, including 4 males and 14 females, aged from 55 to 78 years old, with an average of (68.11±7.20) years old. The operation time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative drainage volume, fracture healing time, neck-shaft angle and the height of the humeral head, failure of internal fixation the shoulder function at the last follow-up was assessed using Neer's scoring system. RESULTS: All 18 patients were followed up, and the duration ranged from 10 to 12 months, with an average of (11.08±0.65) months. The operation time was (66.44±5.06) min, the intraoperative bleeding volume was (206.67±36.14) ml, the postoperative drainage volume was (76.11±9.63) ml, and the fracture healing time was (17.28±3.92) weeks. At the last follow-up, the degree of loss of neck-shaft angle was (5.44±0.86) ° and the loss of the height of humeral head was (1.43±0.27) mm. All 18 patients had healing without complications such as fracture, withdrawal, penetration of internal fixation and necrosis of humeral head. According to Neer's evaluation standard, the total score was (89.61±5.60), 10 cases got an excellent result, 6 good, 2 fair. CONCLUSION Allogeneic femoral head combined with PHILOS is an appropriate treatment for the four-part proximal humerus fractures with humeral head collapse, exhibiting good clinic outcome.
Male ; Female ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Aged ; Humeral Head ; Shoulder ; Treatment Outcome ; Bone Plates ; Retrospective Studies ; Humerus ; Shoulder Fractures/surgery* ; Fracture Fixation, Internal/adverse effects* ; Humeral Fractures ; Allografts

OBJECTIVE: To explore clinical effect of attaching locking plate with bone grafting based on retaining the original intramedullary nail in treating non-union after intramedullary nail fixation of long shaft fractures of lower limbs. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on 20 patients treated with non-union fractures after intramedullary nailing of long shaft fractures of lower limbs from June 2015 to June 2020. All patients were treated with the original intramedullary nailing and bone grafting from the iliac bone, and were underwent open reduction plate internal fixation and bone grafting for old fractures. Among them, 14 were males and 6 were females, aged from 35 to 56 years old with an average of (42.2±9.6) years old. Nine patients were femoral shaft fracture and 11 patients were tibial shaft fracture. According to characteristics of fracture end nonunion, 6 patients were stable/atrophic, 9 patients were unstable/large, and 5 patients were unstable/atrophic. The nonunion time ranged from 8 to 12 months with an average of(9.8±2.0) months after the initial surgery. Visual analogue scale (VAS), knee range of motion, bone healing time, complications and fracture-end healing were recorded before and at the latest follow-up. RESULTS: All patients were followed up for 18 to 48 months with an average of (36.3±10.5) months. The incision of all patients were healed at stageⅠwithout complications such as infection or internal fixation ruptur. Healing time of femur and tibia was (8.5±2.6) months and (9.5±2.2) months. Knee joint motion increased from preoperative (101.05±8.98) ° to postoperative (139.35±8.78) ° at the latest follow-up (t=-12.845, P<0.001). VAS decreased from preoperative (5.15±1.72) to postoperative (0.75±0.96) at the latest follow-up (t=11.186, P<0.001). CONCLUSION On the basis of retaining the original intramedullary nail, the addition of locking plate internal fixation and autogenous iliac bone grafting have advantages of simple operation, less trauma, fewer complications and high fracture healing rate. It is one of the effective surgical schemes for the treatment of nonunion after intramedullary nail fixation of long bone fracture of lower extremity.
Male ; Female ; Humans ; Adult ; Middle Aged ; Bone Transplantation ; Retrospective Studies ; Bone Plates ; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary/adverse effects* ; Femoral Fractures/complications* ; Lower Extremity ; Fractures, Ununited/surgery* ; Fracture Healing ; Tibial Fractures/complications* ; Bone Nails ; Treatment Outcome

PURPOSE: Treatment of distal tibia fractures poses significant challenge to orthopedic surgeon because of poor blood supply and paucity of soft tissue coverage. There is considerable controversy regarding the superior option of treatment for distal tibia fracture between the minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) technique and intramedullary interlocking (IMIL) nailing for extra-articular distal tibia fractures. The aim of our study is to compare the functional outcome between the two treatment methods. METHODS: This was the prospective comparative study of 100 patients with distal third tibia fractures divided into two groups. The first group of patients were treated with MIPPO technique while the second group of patients were managed by IMIL nailing. Patients were followed up in outpatient department to assess the functional outcomes, malunion, delayed union, nonunion, superficial and deep infection between the two groups. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS software (version 16.0). RESULTS: Average malunion (degrees) in the MIPPO group was 5 (3-7) ± 1.41 vs. 10.22 (8-14) ± 2.04 in the IMIL group (p = 0.001). Similarly postoperative knee pain in the IMIL group was 10% vs. 2% in the MIPPO group (p = 0.001). In terms of superficial infection and nonunion, the results were 8% vs. 4% and 2% vs. 6% for the MIPPO and IMIL group, respectively (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION Both procedures have shown the reliable method of fixation for distal extra-articular tibia fractures preserving the soft tissue, bony vascularity and fracture hematoma that provide a favourable biological environment for fracture healing. Considering the results of the study, we have slightly more preference for the MIPPO technique.
Bone Plates/adverse effects* ; Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods* ; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary/methods* ; Fracture Healing ; Humans ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods* ; Prospective Studies ; Tibia/surgery* ; Tibial Fractures ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVE: To explore clinical effect of lateral locking compression plate combined with medial buttress plate in treating osteoporotic comminuted fractures of proximal humerus. METHODS: From May 2017 to December 2021, 12 patients with osteoporotic comminution of proximal humerus were treated by lateral locking compression plates combined with medial buttress plates, including 5 males and 7 females, aged from 55 to 78 years old, bone mineral density(BMD) less than -2.5 g/cm3, the time from injury to operation was from 2 to 6 days. According to Neer classification, 7 patients were type Ⅲ, 4 patients were type Ⅳ and 1 patient was type Ⅵ. Postoperative complications, fracture healing and internal fixation were observed and Constant-Murley score of shoulder joint was used to evaluate clinical effects at 6 months after operation. RESULTS: Postoperative wound healed well at stage I. All patients were followed up from 6 to 18 months. Humeral head collapse and necrosis occurred in 1 patient and humeral head varus in 1 patient. No impact of shoulder joint, internal fixation loosening occurred. Constant-Murley score at 6 months ranged from 45 to 90 points, and 6 patients got excellent result, 3 good, and 3 poor. CONCLUSION Locking compression plate combined with medial buttress plate could effectively reconstruct medial humeral column support and enhance fracture stability, and receive satisfactory clinical results. However, no control group was established in this study, and function of shoulder joint has not been evaluated many times after operation, so it cannot dynamically reflect changes of shoulder joint function.
Aged ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Bone Plates/adverse effects* ; Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods* ; Fractures, Comminuted/surgery* ; Humeral Fractures/complications* ; Humeral Head ; Humerus ; Shoulder Fractures/surgery* ; Treatment Outcome ; Osteoporotic Fractures/surgery*

Humans ; Lidocaine ; Anesthesia, Local ; Radius Fractures/surgery* ; Anesthetics, Local/adverse effects* ; Bone Plates ; Fracture Fixation, Internal

OBJECTIVE: This paper is aimed at investigating the efficacy of combining internal fixation using prefabricated rib-locking titanium plate with ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral nerve blockade in treating multiple rib fractures among the elderly. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 221 elderly patients with multiple rib fractures treated from February 2016 to November 2020. According to whether surgery was performed, they were divided into the plate-blockage combination group (surgical group, 102 cases) and conservative treatment group (non-surgical group, 119 cases). The surgical group consisted of 58 males and 44 females aged from 60 to 85 years old, with an average of (67.2±3.6 ) years old, who suffered from 3 to 12 rib fractures with an average of (5.3±2.1) fractures. The non-surgical group consisted of 66 males and 53 females aged from 60 to 84 years old with an average of (66.8±3.2) years old, who suffered from 2 to 11 rib fractures with an average of(6.1±2.3) fractures. The clinical data, efficacies observed, and complications associated with both groups were compared and analyzed. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in preoperative clinical data between two groups (P>0.05), and all patients were discharged smoothly. Pulmonary infection (P=0.028), atelectasis (P=0.032), respiratory failure (P=0.026), time to get out of bed (P=0.040), time to fracture healing (P=0.035), length of hospital stay in the operation group (P=0.043), visual analogue scale (VAS) at 3 days (P=0.028), 5 days(P=0.032), and 7 days(P=0.019), maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV) at 3 months after surgery (P=0.042), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)(P=0.035), and maximal voluntary ventilation at 6 months, the maximal voluntary ventilation(MVV)(P=0.021) and forced FEV1(P=0.026) were all significantly better than those in non-surgical treatment group. CONCLUSION For elderly patients with severe multiple rib fractures, the proposed plate-blockade combination can timely and effectively relieve pain, restore thoracic stability, shorten hospital stay, and reduce the incidence of complications such as pulmonary infections and acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS) compared with non-surgical treatments. Prefabricated rib-locking titanium plates have proved to demonstrate high clinical efficacy in treating multiple rib fractures among the elderly.
Male ; Female ; Humans ; Aged ; Middle Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Rib Fractures/etiology* ; Titanium ; Retrospective Studies ; Bone Plates/adverse effects* ; Fracture Fixation, Internal/adverse effects* ; Treatment Outcome ; Ultrasonography, Interventional/adverse effects* ; Nerve Block/adverse effects* ; Ribs