WPRIM Management System> DCMS> Journal of Gynecologic Oncology> 2020> 31> 6

Volume: 31 Issue: 6

1. Feasibility and safety of fertilitysparing surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer with dense adhesion: a longterm result from a single institution Page:e85—
2. Comments on: Fertility-sparing treatment for intramucous, moderately differentiated, endometrioid endometrial cancer: a Gynecologic Cancer Inter-Group (GCIG) study Page:e96—
3. High mobility group box 3 promotes cervical cancer proliferation by regulating Wnt/β-catenin pathway Page:e91—
4. Olaparib and bevacizumab in frontline maintenance of ovarian cancer: an over reliance in unpowered subgroup analysis of the PAOLA-1 trial? Page:e95—
5. Impact of COVID-19 in gynecologic oncology: a Nationwide Italian Survey of the SIGO and MITO groups Page:e92—
6. The post-progression survival of patients with recurrent or persistent ovarian clear cell carcinoma: results from a randomized phase III study in JGOG3017/GCIG Page:e94—
7. Evaluation of the optimal sequence of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy in the treatment of advanced endometrial cancer Page:e90—
8. High expression of maternal embryonic leucine-zipper kinase (MELK) impacts clinical outcomes in patients with ovarian cancer and its inhibition suppresses ovarian cancer cells growth ex vivo Page:e93—
9. Reclassification of BRCA1 and BRCA2variants found in ovarian epithelial, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancers Page:e83—
10. Management of stage II endometrial cancer and subsequent oncologic outcomes: a National Cancer Database study Page:e84—
11. Uterine clear cell carcinoma risk in White versus non-White US subpopulations: does race matter? Page:e81—
12. Surviving the COVID-19 pandemic:early response of a gynecologic oncology unit in Singapore Page:e77—
13. Kallikrein 5 overexpression is associated with poor prognosis in uterine cervical cancer Page:e78—
14. Does adenocarcinoma have a worse prognosis than squamous cell carcinoma in patients with cervical cancer? A real-world study with a propensity score matching analysis Page:e80—
15. Surgical or imaging lymph node assessment in locally advanced cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Page:e79—
16. Feasibility and safety of fertilitysparing surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer with dense adhesion: a longterm result from a single institution Page:e85—
17. Comments on: Fertility-sparing treatment for intramucous, moderately differentiated, endometrioid endometrial cancer: a Gynecologic Cancer Inter-Group (GCIG) study Page:e96—
18. High mobility group box 3 promotes cervical cancer proliferation by regulating Wnt/β-catenin pathway Page:e91—
19. Olaparib and bevacizumab in frontline maintenance of ovarian cancer: an over reliance in unpowered subgroup analysis of the PAOLA-1 trial? Page:e95—
20. Impact of COVID-19 in gynecologic oncology: a Nationwide Italian Survey of the SIGO and MITO groups Page:e92—
21. The post-progression survival of patients with recurrent or persistent ovarian clear cell carcinoma: results from a randomized phase III study in JGOG3017/GCIG Page:e94—
22. Evaluation of the optimal sequence of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy in the treatment of advanced endometrial cancer Page:e90—
23. High expression of maternal embryonic leucine-zipper kinase (MELK) impacts clinical outcomes in patients with ovarian cancer and its inhibition suppresses ovarian cancer cells growth ex vivo Page:e93—
24. Reclassification of BRCA1 and BRCA2variants found in ovarian epithelial, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancers Page:e83—
25. Management of stage II endometrial cancer and subsequent oncologic outcomes: a National Cancer Database study Page:e84—
26. Uterine clear cell carcinoma risk in White versus non-White US subpopulations: does race matter? Page:e81—
27. Surviving the COVID-19 pandemic:early response of a gynecologic oncology unit in Singapore Page:e77—
28. Kallikrein 5 overexpression is associated with poor prognosis in uterine cervical cancer Page:e78—
29. Does adenocarcinoma have a worse prognosis than squamous cell carcinoma in patients with cervical cancer? A real-world study with a propensity score matching analysis Page:e80—
30. Surgical or imaging lymph node assessment in locally advanced cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Page:e79—