A Comparison of Radiographic Alignment between Bilateral and Unilateral Interbody Cages in Patients Undergoing Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
- Author:
Mark James LAMBRECHTS
1
;
Jeremy HEARD
;
Nicholas D’ANTONIO
;
John BODNAR
;
Gregory SCHNEIDER
;
Evan BLOOM
;
Jose CANSECO
;
Barrett WOODS
;
Ian David KAYE
;
Mark KURD
;
Jeffrey RIHN
;
Alan HILIBRAND
;
Gregory SCHROEDER
;
Alexander VACCARO
;
Christopher KEPLER
Author Information
- Publication Type:Clinical Study
- From:Asian Spine Journal 2023;17(4):666-675
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Methods:Patients >18 years old who underwent primary one- or two-level TLIFs at our institution were identified and propensitymatched in a 3:1 fashion (unilateral:bilateral). Patient demographics, surgical characteristics, and radiographic outcomes, including vertebral endplate obliquity, segmental lordosis, subsidence, and fusion status, were compared between groups.
Results:Of the 184 patients included, 46 received bilateral cages. Bilateral cage placement was associated with greater subsidence (1.06±1.25 mm vs. 0.59±1.16 mm, p=0.028) and enhanced restoration of segmental lordosis (5.74°±14.1° vs. −1.57°±10.9°, p=0.002) at the 1-year postoperative point, while unilateral cage placement was associated with an increased correction of endplate obliquity (−2.02°±4.42° vs. 0.24°±2.81°, p<0.001). Bilateral cage placement was significantly associated with radiographic fusion on bivariate analysis (89.1% vs. 70.3%, p=0.018) and significantly predicted radiographic fusion on multivariable regression analysis (estimate, 1.35; odds ratio, 3.87; 95% confidence interval, 1.51–12.05; p=0.010).
Conclusions:Bilateral interbody cage placement in TLIF procedures was associated with restoration of lumbar lordosis and increased fusion rates. However, endplate obliquity correction was significantly greater for patients who received a unilateral cage.
