The use of fluorescent marking technique as an indicator Of cleanliness and disinfection in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
- Author:
Expedito T. Yala
1
;
Cecilia C. Maramba-Lazarte
1
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords: Fluorescent marker; Environmental culture
- MeSH: Cross Infection
- From: Pediatric Infectious Disease Society of the Philippines Journal 2016;17(2):47-55
- CountryPhilippines
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Background:Environmental surfaces harbor pathogens that transmit them and there is a need for environmental cleaning and disinfection to prevent the spread of infection.
Objective:This study aimed to determine if the use of fluorescent marking (FM) technique in high touch areas can be used as an index of cleanliness and disinfection as determined by aerobic colony count.
Methods:This was an experimental study done at the University of the Philippines Philippine General Hospital Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). A total of 40 surfaces were swabbed for cultures with aerobic colony count (ACC) then adjacent areas are marked with fluorescent gel. After cleaning and disinfection, checking for residual fluorescent markings with congruent environmental culture with an aerobic colony count of the same surface was done. The rate of removal and colony count were then compared to assess the specificity and sensitivity of the fluorescent marking technique as a gauge of cleanliness of high touch surface areas. Any residual fluorescence of the marked areas was considered unclean and an aerobic colony count of < 2.5 – 5CFU/ml 2 were considered an acceptable level of cleanliness.
Result:A total of 40 high contact surfaces were sampled from 5 areas were collected. Prior to cleaning, 60% (24) of the surfaces (60%) did not contain microorganisms. After cleaning, the (FM) had 38% and in the ACC 83% were assessed to be clean. The sensitivity of FM is 85.71% and specificity of 42.42%. The positive predictive value (PPV) is 24% with the positive likelihood ratio (positive LR) of 1.49 and the negative predictive value (NPP) is 93.33%.
Conclusion:The use of Fluorescent Marking technique in high touch areas as an index of cleanliness and disinfection is a good marker for cleanliness and disinfection. Furthermore, it is a simple, rapid, inexpensive and has potential to increase awareness of the environment that can be utilized as an objective parameter to assess cleanliness and disinfection. - Full text:jo51_ja06.pdf
