Immediate psychological responses and coping styles of tertiary school employees during the COVID-19 pandemic
- Author:
Adelaida G. Rosaldo
1
;
Charlie C. Falguera
1
;
Joel A. Valencia
1
;
Carmen N. Firmo
1
;
Filedito D. Tandinco
1
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords: Immediate psychological responses; Coping styles; College; University of the Philippines
- MeSH: COVID-19; Pandemics; Occupational Groups
- From: Philippine Journal of Health Research and Development 2020;24(4):20-32
- CountryPhilippines
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Background:The COVID-19 outbreak broadly affected not only the physical but also the psychological
wellbeing of the people. However, few studies have been conducted concerning its psychological impact
specifically on employees from the academe.
Objectives:To determine the psychological responses and coping styles of employees of the School of Health Sciences at the University of the Philippines - Manila during the COVID-19 pandemic. Specifically, this study sought to determine the association between participants' socio-demographic characteristics and their psychological responses, and between participants' psychological responses and their coping styles used.
Methodology:We employed a cross-sectional design and self-selection or volunteer sampling to recruit 46 academics and support staff employed during the COVID-19 pandemic. The data were collected in April 2020. Psychological responses were determined with the 10-item Kessler's Psychological Distress Scale. Coping styles were assessed with the short-form Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire. Likelihood ratio chisquare tests and Spearman rho tests were conducted to test the hypotheses. Statistical significance was determined at p < .05.
Results:The majority of participants reported low levels of psychological distress in the early stage of the pandemic (n=44; 95.65%). We found a statistically significant relationship between psychological responses and coping styles characterized by rumination (rs = 0.454; P = 0.002) and catastrophizing (rs = 0.408; P = 0.005).
Conclusions:Our study confirmed the significance of psychological responses during the COVID-19 pandemic and demonstrated a specific association with coping styles characterized by rumination and catastrophizing but are unsuitably less adaptive. Hence, the application of less adaptive techniques when psychologically distressed from the pandemic need to be corrected or modified. - Full text:pjhrd 30.pdf
