Surface judgments, profound questions: A homosexual male's Phlebotomy experience
- Author:
Chadwick Co Sy Su
1
;
Paul Martin Anthony C. Cenizal
2
;
Teresita E. Dumagay
3
,
4
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords: Standpoint Theory; Institutional bias
- MeSH: Phlebotomy; Communication; Homosexuality; Blood Donation
- From: Philippine Journal of Health Research and Development 2019;23(4):12-17
- CountryPhilippines
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Background and Objectives:Two of the authors, one heterosexual and one homosexual, both voluntarily donated blood to a well-known health institution in the Philippines. As they were filling out the paperwork, one of the authors' attention was called by one of the questions in the form: “Nakipagtalik ka na ba sa iyong kauri?,” which can be literally translated as “Have you had sex with your own kind?”. This erroneously phrased
question was the sole question interrogated and problematized in the study.
Methodology:Reviews of Standpoint Theory and the methodology associated with it and, in effect, used in the study, formed part of the critique, divided into individual narrations and interpretations by each author. A third co-author, a hematologist, lent her insight on the logistics and issues of phlebotomy. Institutional ethnography was brought to bear on the narratives
Results and Conclusion:This three-author collaboration is presented as a claim that an interdisciplinary approach may open new vistas to a phenomenon that has long existed but been ignored. Reviews of Standpoint Theory and curriculum planning for health professionals are recommended. - Full text:pjhrd 23.pdf
