Analysis of doctor′s diagnosis and treatment behavior before and after the implementation of diagnosis-intervention packet based on propensity score matching: taking chronic diseases as an example
10.3760/cma.j.cn111325-20220902-00769
- VernacularTitle:基于倾向值匹配的DIP实施前后医生诊疗行为分析：以慢性病为例
- Author:
Lu LI
1
;
Lizhong LIANG
;
Yanwei LIN
;
Zhirong ZENG
Author Information
1. 广东医科大学公共卫生学院，湛江 524001
- Keywords:
Chronic diseases;
Propensity score matching;
Diagnosis-intervention packet;
Doctor′s diagnosis and treatment behavior;
Cost structure;
Degree of structure
- From:
Chinese Journal of Hospital Administration
2023;39(3):195-200
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To analyze the effect of the implementation of diagnosis-intervention packet (DIP) on the doctors′ diagnosis and treatment behavior of chronic diseases, so as to provide reference for further improving medical insurance payment related policies.Methods:The first page information of chronic disease patients admitted to hospitals with diabetes, hypertension and coronary atherosclerotic heart disease as the main conditions in 103 hospitals at all levels and township health centers in a city from 2016 to 2020 was collected, and the patients were divided into non-DIP group and DIP group according to the implementation time of DIP. After 1∶1 propensity score matching to balance the general conditions of the 2 groups, the diagnosis and treatment behaviors were analyzed from two dimensions: diagnostic behavior and treatment behavior. The grade A rate of medical record writing, admission and discharge diagnosis coincidence rate, and the average length of stay were used to evaluate the diagnostic behavior; the proportion of drugs and the degree of change in the cost structure were used as the evaluation indicators of treatment behavior.Results:After matching, 41 050 patients were included in both the non-DIP group and the DIP group.From the perspective of diagnostic behavior, the grade A rate of medical record writing in the non-DIP group and the DIP group was 99.40% and 99.83%, the coincidence rate of admission and discharge diagnosis was 58.42% and 61.79%, the average hospital stay was 8.03 days and 7.04 days respectively, and the difference between the groups was significant ( P<0.05). From the view of treatment behavior, the proportion of drugs decreased from 33.00% in the non-DIP group to 27.59% in the DIP group, with a significant difference ( P<0.05); the drug cost represented by Western medicine changed negatively, while the diagnostic cost showed a positive change. Conclusions:DIP has played a certain role in regulating doctors′ diagnosis and treatment behavior for chronic diseases. Among them, doctors have significantly improved their diagnostic behavior for chronic diseases, and the proportion of drugs in treatment behavior has been well controlled.
