Construction of evaluation indicator system for promoting common prosperity of health care in Zhejiang province
10.3760/cma.j.cn111325-20220627-00575
- VernacularTitle:浙江省卫生健康共同富裕评价指标体系的构建
- Author:
Huimei HU
1
;
Jie LIN
;
Dingwan CHEN
;
Qisheng GAO
;
Guan WANG
;
Qian HAO
;
Weijia KONG
;
Qiaoling CHEN
;
Qing SHEN
Author Information
1. 杭州医学院公共卫生学院，杭州 311399
- Keywords:
Health care evaluation mechanisms;
Common prosperity;
Indicator system;
High-quality development;
Zhejiang province
- From:
Chinese Journal of Hospital Administration
2022;38(12):891-895
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To establish a set of scientific and reasonable indicator system of common prosperity in the field of health, so as to promote the construction and evaluation of the demonstration area of common prosperity with high quality of health.Methods:According to the requirements of promoting common prosperity demonstration area with high quality of health in Zhejiang province, the initial indicator pool was established through literature research and theoretical analysis in July 2021, and experts were convened to carry out expert brainstorming to determine indicator system in the form of meetings. Delphi method was used to conduct two rounds of expert consultation on the indicator system.Finally, the analytic hierarchy process and percentage weight method were used to calculate the indicator weight value.Results:The final indicator system included 4 first-level indicators and 30 second-level indicators. Among the first-level indicators, the weight values of the development, equilibrium, inclusiveness, and sustainability were 0.326 4, 0.242 8, 0.245 8, and 0.185 0. There were 8 second-level indicators in developmental indicator dimension, of which the indicator with the highest weight was the per capita health expectancy. The balance indicator dimension included 6 second-level indicators, of which the indicator with the highest weight was the per capita financing difference of basic medical insurance between the urban workers with the urban-rural residents. The inclusive indicator dimension included 6 second-level indicators, and the proportion of personal health expenditure to total health expenditure had the highest weight. The sustainability indicator dimension included 10 second-level indicators, and the proportion of government health expenditure in fiscal expenditure had the highest weight.Conclusions:The indicator system constructed in this research could provide certain guidance and reference for promoting the construction of common prosperity in health, and provide some reference for follow-up research in this field.
