Design of surgical procedures for patients with special protrusion with digital technology
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0290.2023.01.012
- VernacularTitle:数字化技术设计偏突颌患者手术方案的研究
- Author:
Yangyang LIN
1
;
Yuanyuan WANG
;
Min HOU
;
Tao QIAO
;
Jinghao DUAN
;
Yunqi YANG
;
Qiuyu CAO
Author Information
1. 天津市口腔医院正颌外科 南开大学医学院 天津市口腔功能重建重点实验室，天津 300041
- Keywords:
Hemignathia;
Three-dimensional measurement;
Digital technology;
Surgical simulation;
Predictive analysis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Medical Aesthetics and Cosmetology
2023;29(1):45-49
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To analyze the symmetry of different reference planes in the surgical simulation design of patients with protrusive jaw deformity with high and low eyes.Methods:Fifteen patients with partial jaw deformity were selected from January 2019 to June 2020, including 3 males and 12 females, aged 18-26 years, with average 23.78 years. Inclusion criteria were that the patients, aged more than 18 years, were diagnosed as protrusive jaw deformity with maxillary occlusal plane tilt and high and low eyes by clinical and imaging analysis. Three different 3D reference plane systems were established by different modeling methods. The distance between the landmarks of soft and hard tissues and the median sagittal plane was measured. The symmetry of skull was qualitatively analyzed by mirror image technique. The difference of three reference planes in surgical simulation symmetry of patients with protrusion jaw and high and low eyes was evaluated by one-way ANOVA.Results:Qualitative analysis showed that in the three measurement planes, the symmetry of the third reference plane was the best, and the symmetry of the second and the first was poor. Quantitative analysis showed that in measurement index of hard tissue, there was statistical difference between the distance of each landmark in the reference plane established by Method 3 and Method 1, Method 2 [(1.65±1.19) mm; (3.37±1.58) mm; (3.26±2.36) mm, P<0.05], but there was no statistical difference between Method 1 and Method 2 (P > 0.05). The measurement result of soft tissue was consistent with that of hard tissue, and the distance of each landmark in Method 3 from the median sagittal plane was very small, and the mean error was less than 0.5 mm, which was consistent with the clinical results. Conclusions:Digital model surgery technology can assist orthognathic surgeons in the design and prediction of surgical scheme, especially for patients with special partial jaw deformity.
