An artificial intelligence-based system for measuring the size of gastrointestinal lesions under endoscopy (with video)
10.3760/cma.j.cn321463-20210111-00025
- VernacularTitle:基于人工智能的自动内镜下病灶尺寸测量系统（含视频）
- Author:
Jing WANG
1
;
Xi CHEN
;
Lianlian WU
;
Wei ZHOU
;
Chenxia ZHANG
;
Renquan LUO
;
Honggang YU
Author Information
1. 武汉大学人民医院消化内科 消化系统疾病湖北省重点实验室 湖北省消化疾病微创诊治医学临床研究中心，武汉 430060
- Keywords:
Artificial intelligence;
Endoscopy, digestive system;
Lesion size
- From:
Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy
2022;39(12):965-971
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To develop an artificial intelligence-based system for measuring the size of gastrointestinal lesions under white light endoscopy in real time.Methods:The system consisted of 3 models. Model 1 was used to identify the biopsy forceps and mark the contour of the forceps in continuous pictures of the video. The results of model 1 were submitted to model 2 and classified into open and closed forceps. And model 3 was used to identify the lesions and mark the boundary of lesions in real time. Then the length of the lesions was compared with the contour of the forceps to calculate the size of lesions. Dataset 1 consisted of 4 835 images collected retrospectively from January 1, 2017 to November 30, 2019 in Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, which were used for model training and validation. Dataset 2 consisted of images collected prospectively from December 1, 2019 to June 4, 2020 at the Endoscopy Center of Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, which were used to test the ability of the model to segment the boundary of the biopsy forceps and lesions. Dataset 3 consisted of 302 images of 151 simulated lesions, each of which included one image of a larger tilt angle (45° from the vertical line of the lesion) and one image of a smaller tilt angle (10° from the vertical line of the lesion) to test the ability of the model to measure the lesion size with the biopsy forceps in different states. Dataset 4 was a video test set, which consisted of prospectively collected videos taken from the Endoscopy Center of Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University from August 5, 2019 to September 4, 2020. The accuracy of model 1 in identifying the presence or absence of biopsy forceps, model 2 in classifying the status of biopsy forceps (open or closed) and model 3 in identifying the presence or absence of lesions were observed with the results of endoscopist review or endoscopic surgery pathology as the gold standard. Intersection over union (IoU) was used to evaluate the segmentation effect of biopsy forceps in model 1 and lesion segmentation effect in model 3, and the absolute error and relative error were used to evaluate the ability of the system to measure lesion size.Results:(1)A total of 1 252 images were included in dataset 2, including 821 images of forceps (401 images of open forceps and 420 images of closed forceps), 431 images of non-forceps, 640 images of lesions and 612 images of non-lesions. Model 1 judged 433 images of non-forceps (430 images were accurate) and 819 images of forceps (818 images were accurate), and the accuracy was 99.68% (1 248/1 252). Based on the data of 818 images of forceps to evaluate the accuracy of model 1 on judging the segmentation effect of biopsy forceps lobe, the mean IoU was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.90-0.92). The classification accuracy of model 2 was evaluated by using 818 forceps pictures accurately judged by model 1. Model 2 judged 384 open forceps pictures (382 accurate) and 434 closed forceps pictures (416 accurate), and the classification accuracy of model 2 was 97.56% (798/818). Model 3 judged 654 images containing lesions (626 images were accurate) and 598 images of non-lesions (584 images were accurate), and the accuracy was 96.65% (1 210/1 252). Based on 626 images of lesions accurately judged by model 3, the mean IoU was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.85-0.87). (2) In dataset 3, the mean absolute error of systematic lesion size measurement was 0.17 mm (95% CI: 0.08-0.28 mm) and the mean relative error was 3.77% (95% CI: 0.00%-10.85%) when the tilt angle of biopsy forceps was small. The mean absolute error of systematic lesion size measurement was 0.17 mm (95% CI: 0.09-0.26 mm) and the mean relative error was 4.02% (95% CI: 2.90%-5.14%) when the biopsy forceps was tilted at a large angle. (3) In dataset 4, a total of 780 images of 59 endoscopic examination videos of 59 patients were included. The mean absolute error of systematic lesion size measurement was 0.24 mm (95% CI: 0.00-0.67 mm), and the mean relative error was 9.74% (95% CI: 0.00%-29.83%). Conclusion:The system could measure the size of endoscopic gastrointestinal lesions accurately and may improve the accuracy of endoscopists.
