The effects on lumbar disc herniation of supplementing rehabilitation training with repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1424.2023.03.011
- VernacularTitle:重复经颅磁刺激联合康复训练治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效观察
- Author:
Ming WANG
1
;
Ling YANG
;
Xin HUANG
;
Shupei LIU
;
Shun ZHENG
Author Information
1. 武汉科技大学附属天佑医院，武汉 430061
- Keywords:
Transcranial magnetic stimulation;
Rehabilitation training;
Lumbar disc herniation
- From:
Chinese Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
2023;45(3):243-247
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To observe any effect of supplementing conventional rehabilitation training with repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH).Methods:Seventy-two LDH patients were randomly divided into an rTMS group ( n=24), a training group ( n=24), and a combined group ( n=24). The rTMS group received 2Hz rTMS at an intensity of 80% resting motor threshold with a total of 1000 pulses, the training group was given Mackenzie therapy and lumbar core muscle stability training, while the combined group was provided with both. Each group was treated once a day, 6 times a week for 8 weeks. The participants rated their pain using a visual analog scale (VAS), and the Oswestry dysfunction index (ODI) was also used to evaluate the degree of pain and dysfunction in all three groups before and right after the treatment, as well as 8 weeks later. After the treatment, its therapeutic effect was evaluated using the improved Macnab standard. Each patient was followed up for 12 months and any recurrence was recorded. Results:Before treatment there was no significant difference in average VAS ratings or ODI scores among the three groups. Afterward, pain and dysfunction were relieved significantly in all three groups. Compared with the rTMS group, the average VAS rating in the training group was significantly higher and the average ODI score was significantly lower after the treatment and during the follow-up. Moreover, the average VAS rating and ODI score of the combined group were significantly lower than those in the other two groups after the treatment and during follow-up. The total effectiveness rate in the rTMS group was assessed as 62.5% compared with 95.8% in the training group and 100% in the combined group-a significant difference for the rTMS group. Follow-up showed that the recurrence rates of the rTMS group, training group and combined group were 37.5%, 25% and 8.3%, respectively-a significant difference in the case of the combined group.Conclusion:rTMS combined with rehabilitation training can relieve pain, improve lumbar function and reduce the recurrence of LDH.
