Comparison of Computerized Tomography(CT) and Ultrasonography(US) in the Diagnosis of Nasal Bone Fracture and Medial Orbital Wall Fracture.
- Author:
Hee Jung LEE
1
;
Young Cheon NA
;
Seog Keun YOO
Author Information
1. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, Wonkwang University, Iksan, Korea. ycnadr@hanmail.net
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Computerized tomography(CT);
Ultrasonography (US);
Nasal bone fracture;
Medial orbital wall fracture
- MeSH:
Diagnosis*;
Nasal Bone*;
Orbit*;
Radiography;
Sensitivity and Specificity
- From:Journal of the Korean Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association
2002;3(1):55-59
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
For the diagnosis of nasal bone fracture and medial orbital wall fracture, plain radiography and computerized tomography(CT) have been utilized. But plain radiography is less reliable due to its low specificity. So CT has been given a preference to plain radiography in examining both fractures. However, CT has some disadventages; high expense, heavy radiation hazard, and coexistent injuries may restricted a patient,s positioning and so thus preventing or delaying the diagnosis. By comparison, ultrasonography(US) represents a safe, inexpensive, noninvasive, portable, and wide availability. This paper compares the relative values of CT and US in the diagnosis of both fractures. In nasal bone fracture, US proved to be more accurate than CT. Thirty-seven nasal bone fractures were diagnosed by US; whereas only thirty-two of these were revealed on CT. Compared with US, CT demonstrated 87% sensitivity. In examining medial orbital wall fracture, eight cases were diagnosed by CT; whereas seven of these were revealed on US. Compared with CT, US demonstrated 88% sensitivity. In medial orbital wall fracture, US was almost as accurate as CT. In this research, it is concluded that in the investigation of nasal bone fracture and medial orbital wall fracture, US is an accurate diagnostic modality and correlates well with CT.
