Evaluation of brainstem function using vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in patients with early-stage Parkinson′s disease
10.3760/cma.j.cn113694-20221010-00755
- VernacularTitle:前庭诱发肌源性电位对早期帕金森病患者脑干功能的评估
- Author:
Yun SHEN
1
;
Weiye XIE
;
Hanxing LI
;
Fen WANG
;
Yongping DAI
;
Chunfeng LIU
Author Information
1. 苏州大学附属第二医院神经内科 苏州大学附属第二医院神经疾病研究中心，苏州 215004
- Keywords:
Parkinson disease;
Brain stem;
ROC curve;
Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials
- From:
Chinese Journal of Neurology
2023;56(5):485-493
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate whether vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP) can be used to assess brainstem and its supplementary diagnostic value in patients with early-stage Parkinson′s disease (PD).Methods:A total of 123 patients with early-stage PD (PD group) diagnosed in the Department of Neurology of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from January 2019 to January 2022 were consecutively enrolled, and 122 healthy controls (healthy control group) were included. Cervical VEMP (cVEMP) and ocular VEMP (oVEMP) examinations were performed on all subjects. VEMP parameters between the 2 groups were compared, and receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the auxiliary diagnostic efficacy of VEMP for early-stage PD. Correlations between VEMP parameters and motor and non-motor symptoms such as autonomic dysfunction were analyzed in the PD group using Spearman correlation analysis.Results:Bilateral latencies of cVEMP [left P1 latency (Lp13): 19.0 (16.4, 20.9) ms vs 13.1(12.0, 14.2) ms, Z=-11.18, left N1 latency (Ln23): 27.4 (24.6, 29.9) ms vs 21.2 (19.8, 23.0) ms, Z=-10.14; right P1 latency (Rp13): 18.8 (16.2, 20.9) ms vs 13.0 (11.7, 14.1) ms, Z=-10.84, right N1 latency (Rn23): 27.7 (24.3, 29.7) ms vs 21.1 (19.6, 22.9) ms, Z=-10.50] and bilateral latencies of oVEMP [left N1 latency (Ln10): 12.7 (10.7, 14.4) ms vs 10.4 (9.7, 11.4) ms, Z=-8.02, left P1 latency (Lp15): 16.5 (15.1, 18.3) ms vs 14.5 (13.4, 15.3) ms, Z=-7.96; right N1 latency (Rn10): 12.8 (11.4, 14.0) ms vs 10.5 (9.7, 11.5) ms, Z=-8.85, right P1 latency (Rp15): 16.7 (15.3, 18.3) ms vs 14.4 (13.3, 15.1) ms, Z=-9.39] of the PD group significantly prolonged compared to the healthy control group (all P<0.001). Compared to the healthy control group, the area under the curve (AUC) values of Lp13, Ln23, Rp13 and Rn23 of cVEMP in the PD group were all greater than 0.7, and the AUC values of Lp13 and Rp13 in the PD group were greater than 0.9 (all P<0.001); the AUC values of Ln10, Lp15, Rn10, and Rp15 of oVEMP in the PD group were all greater than 0.7 (all P<0.001). The Rn10-p15 corrected amplitude in PD patients was positively correlated with levodopa equivalent dose ( r=0.21, P=0.020). The Rn10 in PD patients was positively correlated with the Non-Motor Symptoms Questionnaire scores ( r=0.21, P=0.023). The Lp13-n23 corrected amplitude was negatively correlated with the Scale for Outcomes in Parkinson′s Disease-Autonomic scores ( r=-0.20, P=0.023). There was no significant correlation between VEMP parameters and Unified Parkinson′s Disease Rating Scale part Ⅲ score ( P>0.05). Conclusion:VEMP, especially cVEMP, as a non-invasive neuroelectrophysiological index, is an objective marker for brainstem damage and could be used for screening early-stage PD patients.
