Efficacy and safety evaluation of the regimen containing Bedaquiline in elderly patients with drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-9026.2023.07.009
- VernacularTitle:含贝达喹啉方案治疗老年耐多药肺结核病患者的有效性及安全性评价
- Author:
Yi HAN
1
;
Yaxue LIANG
;
Hua WANG
;
Xiaoyun FAN
Author Information
1. 安徽医科大学第一附属医院老年呼吸与危重症医学科，合肥 230032
- Keywords:
Tuberculosis, pulmonary;
Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis;
Quinolines;
Treatment outcome
- From:
Chinese Journal of Geriatrics
2023;42(7):799-803
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and adverse reactions of the regimen containing Bedaquiline in elderly patients with multi-drug resistant tuberculosis.Methods:From March 2019 to June 2022, patients with multi-drug resistant pulmonary tuberculosis admitted to Anhui Chest Hospital were randomly divided into two groups: the observation group was given a treatment containing Bedaquiline, and the control group was given a treatment without Bedaquiline.Patients were also divided into elderly patients(age ≥60 years old)and non-elderly patients(age <60 years old)according to age.Sputum culture conversion, lesion absorption and adverse reactions were compared between the observation group and the control group in general, elderly and non-elderly patients, respectively.Results:A total of 170 cases were collected, including 79 in the observation group and 91 in the control group.Sputum culture conversion: The sputum culture conversion rates of observation groups in general, non-elderly and elderly patients were better than that of control groups at the 3rd month after treatment(the general, 96.2% vs.75.8%, χ2=14.001, P<0.001; the non-elderly, 94.9% vs.82.1%, χ2=4.675, P=0.031; the elderly, 100.0% vs. 65.7%, χ2=8.771, P=0.003), and at the 6th month, the rates of overall observation group was better than that of control group(98.7% vs.92.3%, χ2=3.895, P=0.048); the rates of non-elderly and elderly observation group and control group were all greater than 90%, with no statistical significance( P>0.05). Lesion absorption: Overall and non-elderly observation groups were better than control group in lesion absorption at the 3rd month(the general, 84.8% vs.68.1%, χ2=12.962, P=0.002; the non-elderly, 88.1% vs.71.4%, χ2=9.832, P=0.007; and the 6th month(the general, 88.6% vs.76.9%, χ2=14.888, P=0.001; the non-elderly, 89.8% vs.82.1%, χ2=8.618, P=0.013). The focal absorptivity of senile observation group at the end of March and June were 75.0% and 85.0%, respectively, both better than control group, but the difference was not statistically significant( P>0.05). Adverse reactions: Overall and non-senile observation groups had longer QT interval than control groups( P<0.05), but no patients stopped bedaquiline because of this, and there was no significant difference in QT interval between the two groups( P>0.05). Conclusions:In elderly patients with multi-drug resistant pulmonary tuberculosis, early sputum culture conversion turns fast after treatment with Bedaquiline, which has good therapeutic effect, good tolerance and controllable adverse reactions.
