Histological Analysis of Autologous Pericardial Tissue Used as a Small-Diameter Arterial Graft.
- Author:
Ji Hyuk YANG
1
;
Sang Hyun SUNG
;
Won Gon KIM
Author Information
1. Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Seoul Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Blood vessel prosthesis;
Pericardium
- MeSH:
Animal Experimentation;
Animals;
Arteries;
Blood Vessel Prosthesis;
Carotid Arteries;
Collagen;
Dogs;
Endothelial Cells;
Fibrin;
Hemorrhage;
Microscopy;
Microscopy, Electron;
Pericardium;
Phenobarbital;
Thrombosis;
Transplants*;
Ultrasonography, Doppler
- From:The Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
2006;39(4):261-268
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Current vascular prostheses are still inadequate for reconstruction of small-diameter vessels. Autologous pericardium can be a good alternative for this purpose as it already possesses good blood compatibility and shows a mechanical behavior similar to that of natural arteries. However, the clinical use of autologous pericardial tissue as a small-diameter vascular graft has limitations due to mixed outcomes from uncertain biological behavior and difficulty to gain reliable patency results in animal experiments. To study this issue, we implanted fresh and glutaraldehyde-treated autologous pericardium as small-diameter arterial grafts in dogs, and compared their time-related changes histologically. MATERIAL AND METHOD: As a form of 5mm-diameter arterial graft, one pair of autologous pericardial tissue was used for comparison between the glutaraldehyde-treated and the glutaraldehyde-untreated grafts in the bilateral carotid arteries in the same dog. The patency of the grafts were evaluated at regular intervals with Doppler ultrasonography. After the predetermined periods of 3 days, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months, the grafts in each animal were explanted. The retrieved grafts were processed for light and electron microscopic analyses following gross observation. RESULT: Of 7 animals, 2 were excluded from the study because one died postoperatively due to bleeding and the other was documented as one side of the grafts being obstructed. All 10 grafts in the remaining 5 dogs were patent. Grossly, a variable degree of thromboses were observed in the luminal surfaces of the grafts at 3 days and 2 weeks, despite good patency. Pseudointimal smooth blood-contacting surfaces were developed in the grafts at 1 month and later. By light microscopy, mesothelial cell layers of the pericardial tissue were absent in all explanted grafts. Newly formed endothelial cell layers on the blood-contacting surface were observed in both the glutaraldehyde-treated and fresh grafts at 3 months and later. The collagen fibers became degraded by fragmentation in the fresh graft at 1 month and in the glutaraldehyde-treated graft at 3 months. At 6 months, the collagen layers were no longer visible in either the glutaraldehyde-treated or fresh grafts. By electron microscopy, a greater amount of coarse fibrin fibers were observed in the fresh grafts than in the glutaraldehyde-treated grafts and, more compact and well-arrayed layers were observed in the glutaraldehyde-treated grafts than in the fresh grafts. CONCLUSION: The glutaraldehyde-treated small-diameter pericardial arterial grafts showed a better endothelialization of the blood-contacting surface and a slower fragmentation of the collagen layers than the fresh grafts, although it has yet to be proven whether these differences are so significant as to affect the patency results between the groups.
