Comparing one-step common bile duct exploration plus cholecystectomy with two-step endoscopic sphincterotomy plus cholecystectomy in patients over 80 years with concomitant gallbladder and common bile duct stones
10.3760/cma.j.cn113884-20221020-00396
- VernacularTitle:腹腔镜一步法与内镜联合腹腔镜两步法治疗80岁以上胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的疗效比较
- Author:
Jianwen DUAN
1
;
Lei YUAN
;
Yunpeng SUN
;
Da SUN
;
Dapeng XU
;
Mingjia XIAO
;
Hongbo SHEN
;
Jiajun LU
Author Information
1. 温州医科大学附属衢州医院(衢州市人民医院)肝胆外科，衢州 324000
- Keywords:
Choledocholithiasis;
Gallstones;
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy;
Endoscopic sphincterotomy
- From:
Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery
2023;29(3):185-189
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare safety and efficacy of one-stage laparoscopic common bile duct exploration plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LCBDE+ LC) with endoscopic retrodrade cholangiopancreatography plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ERCP+ LC) in elderly patients with concomitant gallbladder and common bile duct (CBD) stones.Methods:This is a two-center retrospective study with clinical data on 492 patients aged over 80 years diagnosed with concomitant gallbladder and CBD stones treated between January, 2014 and December, 2020 at The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University and Quzhou Hospital Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University. There were 254 males and 238 females, aged (83.9±3.0) years. These patients were divided into two groups based on their operative methods: the one-stage group (LCBDE+ LC, n=186) and the two-stage group (ERCP+ LC, n=306). Differences in surgery, stones and hospitalization costs were compared between the two groups. Results:When compared with the ERCP+ LC group, the LCBDE+ LC group had significantly higher incidences of previous gastrectomy [21.5%(40/186) vs 4.2%(13/306)], multiple stones [77.4%(144/186) vs 49.3%(151/306)], larger stone diameter [13.7(6.4, 18.6)mm vs 10.9(5.7, 16.1) mm], and increased hospitalization expenditure [(2.37±0.31) Wanyuan vs (3.26±0.44) Wanyuan] (all P<0.05). However, the rates of residual stone [2.7%(5/186) vs 1.3%(4/306)], stone recurrence [2.2%(4/186) vs 5.2%(16/306)], postoperatively overall complications [3.2%(6/186) vs 1.3%(4/306)], and total hospital stay [(10.7±6.2) d vs (11.3±5.4) d] were not significantly different between the two groups (all P>0.05). Conclusions:Allowing for the similar safety and effectiveness, and lower hospitalization expenditure, LCBDE+ LC was a preferred choice for patients aged over 80 year, especially in patients who had previous gastrectomy, multiple large CBD stones, or who could not accept endoscopic procedures for treatment of CBD stones.
