Actual measurement verification of dose calculation accuracy based on cone-beam CT images
10.3760/cma.j.cn113030-20220705-00231
- VernacularTitle:基于锥形线束CT图像剂量计算准确度的实际测量验证研究
- Author:
Li CHEN
1
;
Gang ZHOU
;
Yanze SUN
;
Qiliang PENG
;
Jieguan HAN
;
Ye TIAN
Author Information
1. 苏州大学附属第二医院放疗科，苏州大学放射肿瘤学研究所，苏州市肿瘤放射治疗重点实验室，苏州 215004
- Keywords:
Cone-beam computed tomograph;
Dose calculation;
Accuracy;
Actual measurement
- From:
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
2023;32(6):539-545
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To evaluate the dose calculation accuracy of cone-beam CT (CBCT) image by actual measurement method.Methods:CBCT images of 60 patients in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from September, 2021 to May, 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. CBCT images of full-fan and half-fan scanning of the head, half-fan scanning of the chest and pelvis were obtained by the Varian OBI system. Hounsfield unit - electron density (HU-ED) curves corresponding to the scanning conditions were established with CIRS electron density phantom. The radiotherapy plans were designed on the CBCT images, and the dose calculation results of the detection point were compared with the ionization chamber measurement results to analyze the dose error. Then, three-dimensional dose verification system was adopted to detect the accuracy of the CBCT image radiotherapy plans implementation process in 60 patients, and the accuracy of dose calculation was verified according to the D 99%, D mean, D 1% of target volume, D mean and D 1% of organs at risk (OAR), and the γ pass rate. Results:In point dose detection in phantom, the dose calculation errors of CBCT images in the above four scanning patterns were -1.06%±0.87%、-1.67%±0.86%, 0.91%±0.73%, -1.54%±0.90%, respectively. In dosimetric verification based on patients' CBCT image treatment plan, the mean difference of D mean, D 99%, and D 1% of planning target volume (PTV) in all scanning modes were not higher than 2%, and the D mean and D 1% differences of other OAR were not higher than 3%, except for the lens of patients in the head. The average γ values of target volume and OAR were less than 0.5 under the criteria of 3%/2 mm. Conclusions:Under the condition of correctly establishing HU-ED curves, intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) / volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning based on CBCT images can be employed to estimate and monitor the actual dose to target volume and OAR in adaptive radiotherapy. Full-fan scanning patterns can further improve the accuracy of dose calculation for the head of patients.
