Study on radiation dose and image quality differences between cone-beam CT and multi-slice spiral CT for atlantoaxial spine imaging
10.3760/cma.j.cn112271-20221208-00477
- VernacularTitle:锥形束CT和多层螺旋CT对寰枢椎成像的辐射剂量和图像质量差异研究
- Author:
Xiaonan HAN
1
;
Jun ZHANG
;
Zhiwei ZHONG
;
Wenjuan WU
;
Zhe GUO
;
Hui XU
;
Huizhao WU
Author Information
1. 河北医科大学第三医院放射科，石家庄 050000
- Keywords:
Atlantoaxial;
Cone beam computed tomography;
Multi-slice spiral computed tomography;
Image quality;
Radiation dose
- From:
Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection
2023;43(5):379-385
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the differences in radiation dose and image quality between cone-beam CT (CBCT) and multi-slice spiral CT (MSCT) applied to atlantoaxial spine imaging.Methods:Head and neck phantom was scanned at 30 exposure parameter combinations using Pramerica CBCT scanner and 15 parameter combinations using Toshiba 320-row MSCT. The effective dose ( E) of CBCT was calculated based on the Monte Carlo dose estimation software PCXMC, the E value of MSCT was obtained by multiplying the dose length product (DLP) by the related factor. t-test for two independent samples or Wilcoxon rank sum test were used for comparison of radiation dose and subjective and objective image quality between two modalities. The subjective evaluation was a 5-point subjective scale using double-blind method for edge sharpness, contrast, soft tissue level, and artifacts of the images. The signal and noise in the region of interest (ROI) were measured and the contrast signal-to-noise ratio (CNR) was calculated. Results:For radiation dose, the volumetric dose index and E values of 2.9 mGy and 27.61 μSv for CBCT were lower than those of 8.8 mGy and 433.16 μSv for MSCT, and the differences were statistically significant( z=-3.05, -5.25, P<0.05). For objective evaluation of image quality, the noise and CNR were 27.74 HU and 3.69 in CBCT group, 7.84 HU and 27.1 in MSCT group. The difference between them were statistically significant( z=-5.39, -5.42, P<0.05). The overall image quality, contrast and artifact scores of the CBCT group were 3.5, 3.0 and 5 were higher than those of the MSCT group at 2.0, 2.0, and 4.0, respectively ( z=-2.32, -2.46, -3.31, P<0.05). Conclusions:Both atlantoaxial CBCT and MSCT scans provide image quality that meets diagnostic requirements. Compared to MSCT, CBCT atlantoaxial scans can effectively reduce radiation dose according to the principle of optimization of radiation protection.
