Comparative study on radiological features between serum aquaporin 4 antibody positive and negative neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder
10.3760/cma.j.cn112149-20221231-01047
- VernacularTitle:水通道蛋白4抗体阳性与阴性视神经脊髓炎谱系疾病影像特征的比较研究
- Author:
Ming MENG
1
;
Jun SUN
;
Jiali SUN
;
Chengyi ZHANG
;
Decai TIAN
;
Yunyun DUAN
Author Information
1. 首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院放射科，北京 100070
- Keywords:
Neuromyelitis optica;
Magnetic resonance imaging;
Aquaporin-4 antibody;
Brain volume
- From:
Chinese Journal of Radiology
2023;57(6):625-631
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the clinical and imaging differences between serum aquaporin 4 (AQP4) antibody positive and negative patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD).Methods:The clinical data and radiologic findings of 89 NMOSD patients diagnosed at Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University from January 2018 to June 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 17 male cases and 72 female cases, aged 18-74 years. According to the results of serum AQP4 antibody test, the patients were divided into AQP4 antibody positive group and AQP4 antibody negative group, and the differences in clinical data, lesion distribution, lesion characteristics, and brain area volume between the 2 groups were compared using independent sample t-test and χ 2 test, and the correlation between brain area volume and expanded disability status scale (EDSS) scores was further investigated using Spearman correlation analysis. Results:There were 68 cases in the AQP4 antibody positive group and 21 cases in the AQP4 antibody negative group. Patients in both groups were predominantly female, but the percentage of females in the AQP4 antibody-positive group (86.8%, 59/68) was higher than that in the AQP4 antibody-negative group (61.9%, 13/21), with a statistically significant difference (χ 2=4.91, P=0.027). The incidence of optic neuritis in AQP4 antibody negative group (66.7%, 14/21) was higher than that in antibody positive group (41.2%, 28/68), with a statistically significant difference (χ 2=4.18, P=0.041). In the distribution of intracranial lesions on MRI, the probability of lesions involving the brain stem in AQP4 antibody negative group (47.6%, 10/21) was higher than that in AQP4 antibody positive group (23.5%, 16/68), the difference had statistically significance (χ 2=4.50, P=0.034). The volumes of whole brain white matter, right amygdala, right accumbens-area and right ventral diencephalon in AQP4 antibody positive group were lower than those in AQP4 antibody negative group ( P<0.05), and the volumes of the right accumbens-area were negatively correlated with the EDSS scores in AQP4 antibody positive group ( r=-0.628, P=0.009). Conclusion:There are differences in clinical and imaging manifestations between AQP4 antibody positive and AQP4 antibody negative patients, which provides more basis for clinical in-depth understanding of NMOSD.
