Effect of remnant cholesterol levels on carotid intima thickness in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus evaluated by ultra-high frequency ultrasound
10.3760/cma.j.cn131148-20221117-00783
- VernacularTitle:2型糖尿病患者残余胆固醇水平对颈动脉内膜厚度的影响
- Author:
Yiming MA
1
;
Jianjun YUAN
;
Mei ZHANG
;
Yanyan GUO
;
Rui XU
;
Yanyan ZHANG
;
Han ZHANG
;
Xijun ZHANG
;
Haohui ZHU
Author Information
1. 新乡医学院,新乡 453000
- Keywords:
Ultra-high frequency ultrasound;
Type 2 diabetes mellitus;
Remnant cholesterol;
Carotid intima thickness
- From:
Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography
2023;32(6):508-514
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To discuss the effect of remnant cholesterol (RC) levels on carotid intima thickness (CIT) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) by ultra-high frequency ultrasound.Methods:A total of 60 patients with T2DM who received treatment in Henan Provincial People′s Hospital from May 2021 to July 2022 were prospectively recruited, and they were divided into a higher RC group (31 cases) and a lower RC group (29 cases) according to the RC levels. Thirty-one age, sex and body mass index(BMI)-matched healthy volunteers were selected as control group. Carotid CIT, carotid media thickness(CMT) and intima-media thickness(CIMT) were measured by 24 MHz ultra-high frequency ultrasound probe. The difference of general clinical data, laboratory indicators and CIMT, CIT, CMT among the three groups were compared, and the influencing factors of CIT in T2DM patients were explored by multivariate regression analysis.Results:①There were no statistical significances in gender, age, BMI, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and CMT among the three groups (all P>0.05). There were no statistical significances in duration of diabetes, fasting blood-glucose and glycated haemoglobin between the two subgroups of T2DM (all P>0.05). ②Compared with the control group, CIMT and CIT were thicker in the T2DM group (both P<0.05). ③CIT was thicker in the higher RC group than in the lower RC group ( P<0.05), while the difference of CIMT was not statistically significant the two groups ( P>0.05). ④Multivariate regression analysis showed that RC was the influence factor of CIT in patients with T2DM(β=0.610, P=0.005). Conclusions:CIT is significantly thicker in T2DM patients with higher RC than in those with lower RC, and RC is the influence factor of CIT, which suggests that more attention should be paid to the detection of RC in T2DM patients.