Diagnosis of extramural venous invasion of rectal cancer by transrectal ultrasound
10.3760/cma.j.cn131148-20220330-00213
- VernacularTitle:经直肠腔内超声诊断直肠癌壁外血管侵犯的价值
- Author:
Shuying FAN
1
;
Guozhu WU
;
Yanwei GAO
;
Hua HONG
;
Fang WANG
;
Jing GUO
;
Xianyan MENG
Author Information
1. 内蒙古科技大学包头医学院研究生学院，包头 014040
- Keywords:
Ultrasonography, transrectal;
Magnetic resonance imaging;
Rectal cancer;
Extramural venous invasion
- From:
Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography
2022;31(11):966-972
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To evaluate the value of transrectal ultrasound(TRUS)in diagnosing extramural venous invasion(EMVI) of rectal cancer.Methods:Clinical data of 81 rectal cancer patients were retrospectively analyzed in the People′s Hospital of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region from January 2015 to December 2021. The extramural vascular sonographic features in these patients were summarized. Based on the postoperative pathology and compared with MRI examination, the efficacy of TRUS for the diagnosis of EMVI in rectal cancer was investigated.Results:①According to the sonographic presentation, extramural vessels of rectal cancer can be divided into the following four types: typeⅠshowed that the mass broke through the muscularis propria of the intestinal wall, and no peripheral vascular shadow was observed; typeⅡshowed that the mass broke through the muscularis propria, surrounded by extraneous vessels with normal diameter, running and blood flow; type Ⅲ showed that the mass broke through the intrinsic muscle layer of the intestinal wall and was surrounded by extramural vessels with abnormally thickened diameters, and blood flow filling defects; type Ⅳ showed a mass that broke through the intrinsic muscular layer, with irregularly dilated vessels outside the peritumoral wall and no blood flow signal in the lumen. ②With type Ⅲ and type Ⅳ as positive signs of EMVI, the diagnosis compliance rate of TRUS was 90.1% (Kappa=0.580, P<0.001), sensitivity was 58.3%, specificity was 95.7%, positive predictive value was 70.0%, negative predictive value was 93.0%, and area under the ROC curve(AUC) was 0.770. The diagnosis compliance rate of MRI was 86.4% (Kappa=0.541, P<0.001), sensitivity was 75.0%, specificity was 88.4%, positive predictive value was 52.9%, negative predictive value was 95.3%, and the AUC was 0.817. The differences in sensitivity and specificity between TRUS and MRI for the diagnosis of rectal cancer EMVI were not statistically significant ( P>0.05), and the differences in the AUC were not statistically significant ( Z=0.447, P=0.655). Conclusions:TRUS is valuable in assessing the extramural vascular status of rectal cancer and is expected to be an effective imaging method for preoperative diagnosis of EMVI.
