Fixation with a retrograde pubic ramus intramedullary nail for anterior pelvic ring fractures
10.3760/cma.j.cn115530-20221216-00642
- VernacularTitle:逆行耻骨上支髓内钉固定治疗骨盆前环骨折的疗效分析
- Author:
Enzhi YIN
1
;
Yangxing LUO
;
Xuefeng YUAN
;
Li HE
;
Meiqi GU
;
Jie XIE
;
Song GONG
;
Zhen WANG
;
Zhe XU
;
Penghui XIANG
;
Ruixiang CHENG
;
Chengla YI
Author Information
1. 华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院创伤外科，武汉 430030
- Keywords:
Pelvis;
Fractures, bone;
Fracture fixation, intramedullary;
Retrograde pubic ramus intramedullary nail;
Surgical procedures, minimally invasive
- From:
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
2023;25(6):491-497
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the clinical efficacy of a retrograde pubic ramus intramedullary nail (RPRIN) in the treatment of anterior pelvic ring fractures.Methods:A retrospective study was conducted to analyze the 14 patients with anterior pelvic ring fracture who had been treated and followed up at Department of Traumatic Surgery, Tongji Hospital From June 2020 to February 2021. There were 10 males and 4 females with an age of (44.8±12.5) years. By the AO/OTA classification for pelvic fractures, 5 cases were type 61-A, 4 cases 61-B, and 5 cases type 61-C; by the Nakatani classification, 1 case belonged to unilateral zone Ⅰ fracture, 5 cases to unilateral zone Ⅱ fracture, 2 cases to unilateral zone Ⅲ fracture, 3 cases to right zone Ⅱ and left zone Ⅲ fracture, 2 cases to zone Ⅲ fracture on both left and right sides, and 1 case to zone Ⅱ fracture on both sides. The time from injury to operation was (7.8±1.8) days. All the anterior pelvic ring fractures were fixated with a RPRIN. The time and fluoroscopic frequency for placement of every single RPRIN, quality of fracture reduction, and pelvic function and incidence of postoperative complications at the last follow-up were recorded.Results:A total of 18 RPRINs were placed in the 14 patients. For placement of each RPRIN, the time was (35.9±8.6) min, and the fluoroscopic frequency (22.8±1.9) times. No complications such as infection occurred at any surgical incision after RPRIN placement. According to the Matta scoring, the quality of postoperative fracture reduction was assessed as excellent in 7 cases, as good in 5 cases and as fair in 2 cases. The 14 patients were followed up for (18.1+1.5) months. Their X-ray and CT images of the pelvis at the last follow-up showed that the fractures healed well and the intramedullary nails were placed in the cortical bone of the anterior ring of the pelvis. According to the Majeed scoring at the last follow-up, the pelvic function was assessed as excellent in 10 cases, as good in 3 cases and as fair in 1 case. One patient reported discomfort during squatting 2 months after operation but the symptom improved 3 months later without any special treatment. No patient experienced such complications as displacement or slippage of RPRIN, or pain at the insertion site.Conclusion:RPRIN is effective in the treatment of anterior pelvic ring fractures, showing advantages of small surgical incision, limited intraoperative fluoroscopy and short operation time.
