Comparison of percutaneous transhepatic choledochoscopic lithotripsy and traditional open hepatectomy in the treatment of regional hepatolithiasis with biliary cirrhosis
10.3760/cma.j.cn431274-20220820-00831
- VernacularTitle:经皮肝胆道造瘘碎石取石术与传统开腹肝段切除术对区域性肝胆管结石合并胆汁性肝硬化的治疗效果对比
- Author:
Jiang PENG
1
;
Boda LIAN
;
Xintian WANG
;
Chen CHEN
;
Zili HE
Author Information
1. 湖南省人民医院（湖南师范大学附属第一医院）肝胆五科，长沙 410000
- Keywords:
Liver cirrhosis, biliary;
Hepatolithiasis;
Percutaneous hepatobiliary fistula lithotripsy;
Hepatectomy
- From:
Journal of Chinese Physician
2023;25(2):192-195,201
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the therapeutic effects of percutaneous transhepatic choledochoscopic lithotripsy (PTCSL) and traditional open hepatectomy (OH) on regional hepatolithiasis with biliary cirrhosis.Methods:From January 2020 to August 2022, 110 cases of regional hepatolithiasis complicated with biliary cirrhosis treated in the hepatology department of Hunan Provincial People′s Hospital were retrospectively collected. According to the surgical methods of treating hepatolithiasis, the patients were divided into minimally invasive group and laparotomy group. The minimally invasive group received PTCSL, and the laparotomy group received OH. The clinical data of the two groups were compared and analyzed, and the postoperative exhaust time, gastrointestinal function recovery time, operation time and intraoperative bleeding volume were observed. The levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), γ-glutamyltransferase(GGT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) before and after operation were compared between the two groups. The incidence of complications and stone removal rate of the two groups were recorded.Results:The postoperative exhaust time (11.12±2.09)h, gastrointestinal function recovery time (25.76±4.28)h, operation time (108.51±16.19)h, intraoperative blood loss (20.16±3.59)ml and postoperative exhaust time (29.35±4.83)h and gastrointestinal function recovery time in the minimally invasive group were less than those in the laparotomy group (36.91±6.35)h, operation time (116.27±21.54)h and intraoperative blood loss (38.03±6.22)ml (all P<0.05). The levels of ALT (77.82±16.25)U/L, GGT (248.16±24.83)U/L and AST (65.42±16.82)U/L in the minimally invasive group after operation were lower than those in the laparotomy group [ALT (102.37±25.64)U/L, GGT (345.45±32.60)U/L and AST (96.30±22.17)U/L] (all P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications was 7.27%(4/55) in the minimally invasive group and that in the laparotomy group was 29.09%(16/55), with statistically significant difference ( P<0.05). The stone removal rate was 61.82%(34/55) in the minimally invasive group and 92.73%(51/55) in the laparotomy group, with statistically significant difference ( P<0.05). Conclusions:PTCSL and OH are effective in the treatment of regional hepatolithiasis complicated with biliary cirrhosis. The traditional OH has a high stone removal rate, and PTCSL has little influence on liver function, small complication rate and fast postoperative recovery.
