Effect analysis of thoracic paravertebral nerve block combined with propofol intravenous anesthesia in radical treatment of lung cancer
10.3760/cma.j.cn431274-20220513-00450
- VernacularTitle:胸椎旁阻滞-丙泊酚复合麻醉在肺癌根治手术中的应用效果分析
- Author:
Song LUO
1
;
Jiaxiang WANG
;
Weicun ZHANG
Author Information
1. 南部战区总医院麻醉科，广州 510000
- Keywords:
Lung neoplasms;
Nerve block;
Thoracic vertebrae;
Propofol;
Hemodynamics
- From:
Journal of Chinese Physician
2023;25(1):86-91
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the effects of thoracic paravertebral nerve block combined with propofol intravenous anesthesia (PPA) on hemodynamic parameters, inflammatory stress indexes, postoperative analgesia and immune indexes in patients with lung cancer undergoing radical surgery.Methods:116 patients with lung cancer admitted to the Southern Theater General Hospital from January 2020 to December 2021 were randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 58 patients in each group. The observation group received PPA combined with general anesthesia, and the control group received sevoflurane inhalation combined with general anesthesia; the hemodynamic parameters, the amount of anesthetic and analgesic drugs used during and after the operation, the pain score of the patients after the operation, the serum interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-10 (IL-10), cortisol (Cor), norepinephrine (NE), vascular cell growth factor-C (VEGF-C), transforming growth factor-β 1(TGF-β1) and T lymphocytes before and after the operation, adverse reactions of the two groups were monitored and compared.Results:The intraoperative dosage of remifentanil and postoperative dosage of sufentanil in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (all P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in cardiac output (CO), systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) and extravascular lung water index (EVLWI) between the observation group and the control group at T 0 to T 3 (all P>0.05); The mean arterial pressure (MAP) at T 1 to T 2 in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, and the MAP at T 3 was lower than that in the control group (all P<0.05). There was no significant difference between observation group and control group in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores at resting state and coughing state 2 h after surgery(all P>0.05). The VAS scores in the observation group at resting state were lower than those in the control group at 4 h and 12 h after surgery (all P<0.05), and the VAS scores in the observation group at coughing state were lower than those in the control group at 4 h, 12 h and 24 h after surgery (all P<0.05). Before surgery, there was no significant difference in serum levels of IL-6, IL-10, Cor, NE, VEGF-C and TGF-β1 between observation group and control group (all P>0.05). The serum levels of IL-6, NE and VEGF-C in observation group were lower than those in control group 24 h after surgery (all P<0.05). Before surgery, there was no significant difference in CD3 +, CD4 + and CD8 + between observation group and control group (all P>0.05). 24 h after operation, the CD3 + in observation group was higher than that in control group ( P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in observation group (10.34%) was lower than that in control group (24.14%, P<0.05). Conclusions:PPA anesthesia for patients undergoing radical resection of lung cancer is conducive to maintaining the stability of hemodynamic parameters, reducing the inflammatory stress response of patients, the impact of surgery on patients′ immune function, and the amount of anesthetic drugs and postoperative analgesics during surgery.
