Effects of nutritional support on chemotherapeutic efficacy and safety in patients with acute myeloid leukemia
10.3760/cma.j.cn341190-20221019-00814
- VernacularTitle:营养支持对急性髓系白血病患者化疗效果及安全性的影响
- Author:
Lichao YANG
1
;
Wenjuan FANG
;
Junyu ZHANG
Author Information
1. 丽水市中心医院血液科，丽水 323000
- Keywords:
Nutritional support;
Leukemia,myeloid,acute;
Drug therapy,combination;
Waist-hip ratio;
Body mass index;
Transferrin;
Total protein;
Treatment outcome;
Drug-r
- From:
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
2023;30(8):1175-1179
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the effects of nutritional support on chemotherapeutic efficacy and safety in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.Methods:A total of 130 patients with acute myeloid leukemia who received treatment in Lishui Municipal Central Hospital from January 2021 to December 2021 were included in this study. They were divided into a control group and an observation group ( n = 65/group) according to different nutritional support methods. Patients in the control group were given routine intervention, while patients in the observation group were given nutritional support based on routine intervention. These two interventions were administered till 1 month after chemotherapy. Chemotherapeutic efficacy and safety were compared between the two groups. Results:Total response rate in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group [92.3% (60/65) vs. 78.5% (51/65), Z = 4.91, P < 0.05]. After chemotherapy, waist-to-hip ratio, arm girth, and body mass index in the observation group were (0.9 ± 0.1), (25.7 ± 1.2) cm, (21.9 ± 2.1) kg/m 2, respectively, which were significantly greater than (0.8 ± 0.1), (24.4 ± 1.1) cm, (20.6 ± 2.1) kg/m 2 in the control group, respectively ( t = 4.13, 6.63, 3.64, all P < 0.05). Transferrin, albumin, prealbumin, and total serum protein in the observation group were (1.4 ± 0.3) g/L, (27.5 ± 3.1) g/L, (171.3 ± 11.3) mg/L, and (61.2 ± 4.3) g/L, respectively, which were significantly higher than (1.3 ± 0.3) g/L, (25.2 ± 2.9) g/L, (154.3 ± 10.3) mg/L, (56.6 ± 4.0) g/L respectively in the control group ( t = 2.24, 4.48, 8.93, 6.31, all P < 0.05). The scores of emotional state, social status, role cognition, and somatic perception in the observation group were (57.5 ± 4.6) points, (64.5 ± 3.8) points, (56.5 ± 4.1) points, (62.0 ± 4.2) points, which were significantly higher than (47.9 ± 4.2) points, (56.4 ± 3.2) points, (47.7 ± 4.5) points, (55.5 ± 5.4) points in the control group ( t = 12.34, 13.04, 11.55, 7.65, all P < 0.05). The total incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was 9.2% (6/65), which was significantly lower than 24.6% (16/65) in the control group ( χ2 = 4.43, P < 0.05). Conclusion:Nutritional support can substantially improve chemotherapeutic efficacy in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia, decrease the incidence of adverse reactions, and is safe. Therefore, nutritional support for patients with acute myeloid leukemia deserves clinical promotion.
