Treatment with a proximal femoral locking plate versus a proximal femoral anti-rotation intramedullary nail for femoral intertrochanteric fractures in older adult patients
10.3760/cma.j.cn341190-20211201-01336
- VernacularTitle:LPFP与PFNA治疗老年人股骨粗隆间骨折的对比研究
- Author:
Liancheng FEI
1
;
Haiguo PAN
;
Jinlei YU
Author Information
1. 湖州市菱湖人民医院骨科，湖州 313018
- Keywords:
Femoral fracture;
Tuberosity;
Fracture fixation, internal;
Steel plate;
Fracture fixation, intramedullary;
Hip function;
Operation time;
Heal;
Postoperative c
- From:
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
2023;30(3):375-378
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the efficacy of a proximal femoral locking plate (LPFP) versus a proximal femoral anti-rotation intramedullary nail (PFNA) in the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures in older adult patients. Methods:A total of 130 older adult patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures who received treatment in Linghu People's Hospital of Huzhou from May 2017 to June 2020 were included in this study. They were randomly assigned to undergo treatment with either a PFNA (observation group, n = 65) or an LPFP (control group, n = 65). Intraoperative blood loss, incision length, operative time, and time to fracture healing were determined in each group. At 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery, the Harris hip score was used to evaluate hip joint recovery. Coxa vara, incision infection, and internal fixation loosening were compared between the two groups. Results:Intraoperative blood loss in the observation group was less than that in the control group [(189.26 ± 48.15) mL vs. (96.47 ± 40.21) mL, t = -11.93, P < 0.001]. Incision length, operative time, and time to fracture healing in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group [(4.03 ± 1.48) cm vs. (12.16 ± 1.55) cm, (72.13 ± 28.75) minutes vs. (120.34 ± 29.01) minutes, (9.89 ± 1.52) weeks vs. (13.63 ± 1.74) weeks, t = -30.59, -9.52, -13.05, all P < 0.001]. At 1 month after surgery, there was no significant difference in Harris hip score between the two groups ( t = 1.28, P > 0.05). At 3 and 6 months after surgery, the Harris hip score gradually increased in the control and observation groups ( F = 13.44, 8.26, both P < 0.001). At 3 and 6 months after surgery, Harris hip scores in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group [(85.17 ± 4.29) points vs. (79.50 ± 4.12) points, (95.30 ± 1.04) points vs. (87.69 ± 1.25) points, t = 7.69, 37.73, both P < 0.001]. The incidence of complications in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group [1.54% (1/65) vs. 10.77% (7/65), χ2 = 4.80, P = 0.029). Conclusion:Compared with LPFP, PFNA can effectively reduce intraoperative blood loss in older adult patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures, accelerate the progress of fracture healing, promote the recovery of the hip joint, and has fewer complications. Therefore, PFNA is worthy of popularization.
