Construction of a follow-up evaluation index system for "Diagnosis of Brucellosis" (WS 269-2019) based on Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process
10.3760/cma.j.cn231583-20220526-00188
- VernacularTitle:基于德尔菲法和层次分析法构建《布鲁氏菌病诊断》（WS 269-2019）标准跟踪评价指标体系
- Author:
Boyan LUO
1
;
Suoping FAN
;
Shoumin NIE
;
Caiqin MA
;
Cuihong AN
;
Wenjing WANG
;
Dijia ZHOU
;
Wenhui CHANG
;
Yangxin SUN
Author Information
1. 陕西省疾病预防控制中心鼠疫与布病防控所，西安 710054
- Keywords:
Brucellosis;
Diagnosis standard;
Follow-up evaluation;
Delphi method;
Analytic hierarchy process;
Index system
- From:
Chinese Journal of Endemiology
2023;42(5):363-368
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To construct a follow-up evaluation index system for "Diagnosis of Brucellosis" (WS 269-2019), and provide a reference basis for the next revision and improvement of the standard.Methods:The evaluation index system for "Diagnosis of Brucellosis" (WS 269-2019) was preliminarily established by consulting relevant references and materials. The experts in the field of diagnosis, treatment, prevention and control of brucellosis were selected, and two rounds of expert consultation were carried out in the form of questionnaires using the Delphi method. The necessity and availability of evaluation indicators were scored, and suggestions for modifying and adding indicators were put forward. Based on this, a standard follow-up evaluation index system was established. At the same time, a judgment matrix was constructed combined with the Saaty scale, and the analytic hierarchy process was used to calculate the weight of each index in the system.Results:After 2 rounds of expert ( n = 10) consultation, a standard follow-up evaluation index system for "Diagnosis of Brucellosis" (WS 269-2019) was constructed with 3 first-level indexes, 8 second-level indexes and 21 third-level indexes. The positive coefficients of experts in 2 rounds of questionnaires were both 100%; the coefficient of authority of experts was 0.82; the Kendall's coefficients of concordance of first-level, second-level and third-level indexes were 0.722, 0.260, and 0.181, respectively, with P < 0.05. Among the first-level indexes, the weight of standard quality evaluation was the highest (0.364), and the weight of standard implementation status was the lowest (0.278); among the second-level indexes, the combined weight of social benefits was the highest (0.186), and the combined weight of advanced nature was the lowest (0.043); among the third-level indexes, the combined weight of timely diagnosis rate was the highest (0.096), and the combined weight of consistency with technical data was the lowest (0.009). Conclusions:The constructed follow-up evaluation index system for "Diagnosis of Brucellosis" (WS 269-2019) is scientific and reliable, which evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively, reduces the defects of a single evaluation, and provides a basis for subsequent revision and improvement of the standard.
