Application analysis of checklist nursing management combined with different artificial liver treatment modes in patients with liver failure
10.3760/cma.j.cn211501-20220927-03003
- VernacularTitle:清单式护理管理结合不同人工肝治疗模式在肝衰竭患者中的应用
- Author:
Jianwei ZHANG
1
;
Haihong SHAN
;
Lihong YUE
;
Jiayu DUAN
;
Wenjing HAO
;
Yan WANG
Author Information
1. 山西白求恩医院（山西医学科学院 同济山西医院）山西医科大学第三医院感染病科，太原 030032
- Keywords:
Liver failure, acute;
Liver, artificial;
List type nursing
- From:
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
2023;39(11):822-830
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the application of list nursing management combined with different artificial liver treatment modes in patients with liver failure.Methods:Fifty-three patients with liver failure hospitalized in Bethune Hospital of Shanxi Province from July 2020 to July 2021 were selected as the control group, 63 patients with liver failure hospitalized in Bethune Hospital of Shanxi Province from July 2021 to July 2022 were selected as the intervention group. According to the different treatment modes of artificial liver for patients, plasma exchange (PE), double plasma molecular adsorption system (DPMAS) and PE + DPMAS treatment were set up in the two groups. The control group received routine nursing care, while the intervention group received checklist nursing care in addition. The changes of albumin (ALB) and prothrombin time (PT) indexes before and after the different treatment modes were compared, together with the occurrence of complications between the two groups after the intervention.Results:The baseline data between the two groups was balanced, the difference had no statistical significant ( P>0.05). After the therapy, the level of ALB of patients who had accepted DPMAS and PE + DPMAS in the intervention group were 25.3(24.0, 27.9) and 23.2(22.4, 26.3) g/L, which were lower than the 28.2(26.3, 29.7) and 29.4(27.2, 30.0) g/L in the control group, the differences were significant ( Z = 2.47, 3.55, both P<0.05). After the therapy, the level of PT of patients in the intervention group under all three treatment modes were 15.8(14.8, 16.8), 22.7(19.2, 26.2) and 6.0(14.6, 20.0) s, which were lower than the 17.4(15.9, 20.9), 26.3(21.4, 36.4) and 21.2(16.9, 23.4) s in the control group, the differences were significant ( Z = 2.10, 2.07, 2.21, all P<0.05). In the intervention group, there were 6 cases of hypotension, anaphylaxis, bleeding, coagulation and infection under the DPMAS treatment mode, which was significant lower than the 11 cases in the control group ( χ2 = 4.97, P<0.05). There were 4 cases in the intervention group with the PE + DPMAS treatment mode occurred complications in above, which were significant lower than the 11 cases in the control group ( χ2 = 6.87, P<0.01). Conclusions:Artificial liver treatment can improve patients′ liver function and coagulation, and list nursing management may help to improve the effect of artificial liver treatment. It can improve nurses′ awareness of risk prejudgement, reduce various risks in the treatment process, reduce the incidence of adverse reactions, and enhance health care and patient satisfaction.
