Chinese version of the stressor scale for emergency nurse: assessment of reliability and validity
10.3760/cma.j.cn211501-20220630-02076
- VernacularTitle:急诊科护理工作应激源量表的汉化及信效度检验
- Author:
Yinghao ZHOU
1
;
Dan ZHOU
;
Xia LIU
;
Wenyan ZHANG
;
Ying FENG
;
Lin ZHAO
Author Information
1. 青岛大学护理学院，青岛 266012
- Keywords:
Emergency service, hospital;
Nurses;
Occupational stressor;
Reliability;
Validity
- From:
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
2023;39(7):506-512
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To translate the Stressor Scale for Emergency Nurse (SSEN), and to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version.Methods:According to the Brislin model to translate and back-translate the orginal English version, the Chinese version of the scale was determined after cross-cultural adaptation and pretesting. From October 2021 to January 2022, 401 emergency nurses in the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University were selected for a questionnaire survey to evaluate the reliability and validity of the translated Chinese scale.Results:The Chinese version of the SSEN retains 27 items, 4 common factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis, and the factor cumulative variance contribution rate was 78.463%. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that χ2/ df=2.280, comparative fitness index=0.933, Tucker-Lewis index=0.924, incremental fit index=0.933, root mean square of approximate residual=0.079, all within the acceptable range. The item-level content validity index of the Chinese SSEN was 0.80-1.00; the scale-level content validity index was 0.97; it was positively correlated with the Maslach Burnout Inventory manual, and the correlation coefficient was 0.456 ( P<0.001); the Cronbach α coefficient of the total table was 0.971, the split-half reliability was 0.877, and the test-retest reliability was 0.958. Conclusions:The Chinese version of the SSEN has good reliability and validity, and it can be used to investgate the occupattional stressors for emergency nurses in the context of Chinese culture.
