Evaluation of the effect of continuous spiral suture in cervical anastomosis of endoscopic esophageal cancer surgery
10.3760/cma.j.cn.115807-20220530-00140
- VernacularTitle:纵隔镜食管癌手术连续螺旋式缝合颈部吻合效果评价
- Author:
Xiao WU
1
;
Rulin QIAN
;
Maolin CHEN
Author Information
1. 河南省胸科医院 郑州大学附属胸科医院 胸外二科，郑州 450000
- Keywords:
Esophageal cancer;
Mediastinoscopy;
Cervical anastomosis;
Spiral suture
- From:
Chinese Journal of Endocrine Surgery
2022;16(6):673-676
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:By comparing the advantages and disadvantages of different forms of purse suture, to explore how to minimize the incidence of anastomotic complications after cervical anastomosis of esophageal cancer.Methods:The clinical data of 45 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent mediastinal endoscopy combined with laparoscopic radical resection of esophageal cancer from Jan.2019 to Jun.2020 in Department of Thoracic Surgery, Henan Chest Hospital were selected. In the observation group, 22 cases were sutured with spiral packing at the esophageal stump, and in the control group, 23 cases were sutured with conventional loading forceps. The clinical effects of the two groups were objectively evaluated.Results:There was no significant difference between the two groups in operation time, intraoperative blood loss or hospitalization days ( P>0.05) . In terms of postoperative complications, the incidence of anastomotic leakage and anastomotic stenosis in the observation group (4.54%, 9.09%) was significantly lower than that in the control group (17.39%, 39.13%) , and there was significant difference in the incidence of anastomotic stenosis ( P<0.05) . Conclusion:The spiral continuous suture of esophageal stump can reduce the incidence of anastomotic fistula/anastomotic stenosis without increasing surgical trauma or prolonging operation time, which is worthy of clinical application.
