Comparison of safety and efficacy of 7.5 Fr and 9.5 Fr flexible ureteroscopy in the primary treatment of upper urinary tract calculi with maximum diameter<1.5 cm
10.3760/cma.j.cn115396-20221110-00380
- VernacularTitle:7.5 Fr和9.5 Fr输尿管软镜一期治疗最大径<1.5 cm上尿路结石的安全性和有效性比较
- Author:
Lei WANG
1
;
Tiandong HAN
;
Zijian TIAN
;
Jun LI
;
Daoxin ZHANG
Author Information
1. 首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院泌尿外科，北京 100050
- Keywords:
Ureteroscopes;
Lithotripsy, laser;
Urinary calculi
- From:
International Journal of Surgery
2023;50(6):375-380
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the safety and efficacy of 7.5 Fr and 9.5 Fr flexible ureteroscopy in the primary treatment of upper urinary tract calculi with maximum diameter<1.5 cm.Methods:Using a prospective randomized controlled study method, 96 patients with upper urinary tract calculi with maximum diameter<1.5 cm admitted to the Department of Urology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University from August 2020 to May 2022 were selected as the study subjects. The patients were divided into two groups by random number table method: the experimental group and the control group, with 48 patients in each group. The experimental group patients underwent 7.5 Fr flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy, while the control group patients underwent 9.5 Fr flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Collect preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data from these patients, including success rate of ureteral access sheath insertion, surgical time, lithotripsy time, stone-free rate, ureteral injury status, and complications status. The measurement data were expressed as mean±standard deviation ( ± s), Student- t test was used for comparison between groups; the Chi-square test was used for inter-group comparison of count data, and the Mann-Whitney U test was used for inter-group comparison of rank data. Results:The success rate of primary sheath insertion in the experimental group was 93.8% (45/48), and that in the control group was 79.2% (38/48), the difference between the two groups was statistically significant ( P<0.05). There were no statistically significant difference between the experimental group and the control group in terms of surgical time [(52.0±11.0) min vs (55.1±11.4) min, P>0.05] and lithotripsy time [(26.0±9.3) min vs (23.7±8.7) min, P>0.05]. At four weeks after surgery, the stone-free rate in the experimental group was 93.3% (42/45), while that in the control group was 97.4% (37/38), there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups ( P>0.05). In terms of the degree of ureteral injury, there were 17 patients had grade 0 injury, 27 patients had grade 1 injury, 4 patients had grade 2 injury, and no patient had grade 3 injury in the experimental group; there were 9 patients had grade 0 injury, 23 patients had grade 1 injury, 13 patients had grade 2 injury, and 3 patients had grade 3 injury in the control group; the difference between the two groups was statistically significant ( P<0.05). In terms of complications, there were 22 cases of hematuria, 9 cases of pain, 8 cases of bladder spasm, and 2 cases of mild fever in the experimental group; there were 24 cases of hematuria, 12 cases of pain, 9 cases of bladder spasm, and 1 case of mild fever in the control group; there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups ( P>0.05). Conclusion:The application of 7.5 Fr flexible ureteroscopy and 9.5 Fr flexible ureteroscopy in the primary treatment of upper urinary tract calculi with maximum diameter<1.5 cm can achieve good stone-free rates, but the 7.5 Fr flexible ureteroscopy has a higher success rate of sheath insertion and less damage to the ureter.
