Retrospective study on the use of epinephrine in patients with drug-induced anaphylactic shock in Chongqing from 2015 to 2022
- VernacularTitle:重庆市2015－2022年药物过敏性休克救治使用肾上腺素情况的回顾性研究
- Author:
Cheng CHEN
1
;
Yan WANG
2
;
Li DENG
2
;
Qian DU
1
;
Songqing LIU
1
;
Xin XI
1
Author Information
1. Dept. of Pharmacy，the Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University，Chongqing 401120，China
2. Chongqing Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring Center，Chongqing 401120，China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
epinephrine;
drug-induced anaphylactic shock;
analysis of drug use;
adverse drug reaction
- From:
China Pharmacy
2023;34(18):2238-2242
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the rationality of epinephrine in the treatment of drug-induced anaphylactic shock， and to provide a reference for further standardizing the treatment measures of anaphylactic shock. METHODS According to the relevant data of the reports of severe adverse drug reaction （ADR） of drug-induced anaphylactic shock provided by Chongqing ADR Monitoring Center from 2015 to 2022， the selection of treatment drugs， and the application of epinephrine in anaphylactic shock were analyzed retrospectively； the clinical outcomes of anaphylactic shock with different epinephrine administration methods were investigated. RESULTS A total of 1 415 cases of severe ADR related to drug-induced anaphylactic shock were reported， with a male-to-female ratio of 1.04∶1； the drugs that caused allergic shock mainly included anti-infective drugs （47.92%）， TCM injections （9.12%）； the patients who suffered from drug-induced anaphylactic shock within 10 min after medication accounted for 43.96%； 97.24% of patients were cured or improved， and 2.76% of patients died or did not been improved. Among 1 415 patients， 63.39% of patients were treated with epinephrine， and the patients who preferred epinephrine treatment accounted for 53.14%； the intramuscular injection， subcutaneous injection， intravenous injection and intravenous drip accounted for 33.78%， 30.32%， 25.75% and 1.23%， respectively. The initial dose range of epinephrine was 0.01-10 mg， and the most frequent single dose was 1 mg （44.70%）. Excessive single doses of intramuscular injection， subcutaneous injection and intravenous injection accounted for 51.03% （148 cases）， 53.13% （136 cases） and 91.47% （193 cases） respectively， and the risk of overdose in intravenous injection was higher （P＜0.05）. The patients receiving initial treatment with epinephrine had a higher improvement rate/cure rate than those who did not use epinephrine （98.14% vs. 96.23%， P＝0.029）； the patients who preferred epinephrine had a higher improvement rate/cure rate than those who did not preferred epinephrine （98.14% vs. 95.17%， P＝0.031）； the improvement rate/cure rate of patients receiving intramuscular injection of epinephrine was higher than those without intramuscular injection （99.01% vs. 96.69%， P＝0.038）. CONCLUSIONS There are some unreasonable phenomena in the treatment of drug-induced anaphylactic shock， such as inappropriate selection of drugs， insufficient use of epinephrine， delay of administration， inappropriate route of administration and excessive single dose.
