Extent of EBP process implementation of PT Clinicians in PLM-affiliated institutions
- Author:
Teresita B. Dalusong
1
;
Claire Koleen F. Mallari
1
;
John Vincent C. Capati
1
;
Vera Gabrielle F. Fernando
1
;
Celestina Marie A. Pestaño
1
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords: Physical therapy clinicians; PLM-affiliated institutions; EBP Process; Implementation
- MeSH: Evidence-Based Practice
- From: Philippine Journal of Health Research and Development 2021;25(1):24-35
- CountryPhilippines
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Background:Evidence Based Practice (EBP) is the conscientious, explicit and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of an individual patient. It integrates clinical expertise, best evidences and patient's values through the implementation of 5 EBP processes: Ask, Acquire, Appraise, Apply and Assess which improve both patient care and clinical practice every time the cycle completes its turn. Despite of its effectiveness, implementation of EBP is a challenge. Variations and inconsistencies in the implementation of the EBP processes were found due to different factors and barriers. Philippines shares the same challenges and barriers in the implementation of EBP process but no local study has been found on the extent of implementation of EBP processes among Physical Therapist.
Objectives:This study determines the extent of the EBP processes implemented by PT clinicians in PLMaffiliated institutions.
Methodology:This is a descriptive cross-sectional survey that made use of a developed and validated questionnaire which collected the data on demographic profile: age, gender and year graduated, highest educational attainment and the extent of EBP process implementation of Physical Therapist in PLM – affiliation centers.
Results:Ninety-three PTs responded in the study. 89.2% (n=83) has BSPT as their highest educational attainment. 2.2% (n=2) has Masters while 3.2% (n=3) has Doctorate in Physical Therapy. EBP is implemented by respondents. Asking clinical questions was implemented at a high extent (composite mean = 2.88) while searching for evidence (2.17), critical appraisal (2.25), use or integration of research (2.46), evaluation of outcomes (2.1) were implemented at a low extent.
Conclusion:Although, EBP processes has been implemented in the local university's affiliation, majority of the processes were implemented at a low extent except for asking clinical questions, which was implemented at a high extent. Greater efforts on addressing common barriers have been recommended to be able to fully implement EBP practice. - Full text:397-952-1-SM.pdf
