Characteristics of responsiveness of cochlear nerve to electrical stimulation in patients with cochlear nerve deficiency.
10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20230227-00089
- VernacularTitle:蜗神经发育不良患者蜗神经对电刺激反应特点的研究
- Author:
Xiu Hua CHAO
1
;
Jian Fen LUO
1
;
Rui Jie WANG
1
;
Zhao Min FAN
1
;
Hai Bo WANG
1
;
Lei XU
1
Author Information
1. Department of Auditory Implantation, Shandong Provincial ENT Hospital, Shandong University, Shandong Second Provincial General Hospital, Shandong Provincial ENT Institute, Jinan 250022, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
Child, Preschool;
Female;
Humans;
Infant;
Male;
Cochlea;
Cochlear Implantation/methods*;
Cochlear Implants;
Cochlear Nerve;
Electric Stimulation;
Evoked Potentials, Auditory/physiology*
- From:
Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
2023;58(7):657-665
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the responsiveness of cochlear nerve to electrical stimulation in patients with cochlear nerve deficiency(CND), to compare their results with those measured in implanted children with normal-sized cochlear nerves, and to investigate the characteristics of the cochlear nerve injury of children with CND. Methods: Participants were children who underwent cochlear implantation at Shandong Provincial ENT Hospital from January 2012 to January 2020, including CND group and control group. The CND group included 51 subjects (male:20; female: 31) who were diagnosed with CND and had normal cochlea. For the CND group, four children had been bilaterally implanted, the mean implantation age was (2.7±1.5) years old. The control group included 21 subjects (male:10; femal:11) who had normal-sized cochlear nerve and normal cochlea. For the control group, all children had been unilaterally implanted except one, and the mean implantation age was (3.0±1.9)years old. Three subjects in the CND group used CI422 electrode arrays, and all the other subjects used CI24RECA/CI512 electrode arrays. The electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAP) had been tried to record for each electrode using Custom Sound EP software (v. 4.3, Cochlear Ltd.) at least six months post first activation. Furthermore, ECAP amplitude growth functions (AGF) were measured at multiple electrode locations across the electrode array. Generalized linear mixed effect models with the subject group and electrode location as the fixed effects and subjects as the random effect were used to compare results of ECAP measurements. Results: In the control group, ECAP could been recorded at all electrodes (100%), but it could only be recorded in 71% (859/1 210) electrodes in the CND group. Additionally, the percentage of electrodes with measurable ECAP decreased from electrode 1 to electrode 22 in the CND group. Compared to the control group, the ECAP thresholds significantly increased, the ECAP amplitudes and AGF slopes significantly decreased, and the ECAP latency significantly increased in the CND group (P<0.01). GLMM showed that the stimulating site had a significant effect on the ECAP threshold, maximum amplitude, and AGF slope (P<0.01), but had no significant effect on the ECAP latency (P>0.05) in the CND group. However, the stimulating site had no significant effects on the ECAP measurements in the control group. Furthermore, the functional status of cochlear nerve varied greatly among CND group. From electrode 1 to electrode 22, the ECAP thresholds gradually increased, the ECAP maximum amplitudes and AGF slopes gradually decreased in the CND group. Conclusion: Compared with patients with normal-sized cochlear nerve, not only the number of residual spinal ganglion neurons reduce,but also the function of spinal ganglion neurons damages in CND patients. The degree of cochlea nerve deterioration varies greatly among CND patients. Generally, the deterioration of cochlear nerve tends to increase from the basal to the apical site of the cochlea.
