Preliminary application of combined auditory monitoring technique in resection of vestibular neurinoma.
10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20220706-00419
- Author:
Ding ZHANG
1
;
Xiu Ying WANG
2
;
Yu Yang LIU
1
;
Jun ZHANG
2
Author Information
1. Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing 100853, China Department of Neurosurgery, the First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
2. Department of Neurosurgery, the First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
Male;
Female;
Humans;
Adult;
Middle Aged;
Neuroma, Acoustic/complications*;
Hearing/physiology*;
Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem/physiology*;
Cochlear Nerve;
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/etiology*;
Retrospective Studies;
Postoperative Complications/prevention & control*
- From:
Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
2023;58(6):589-595
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective: To explore the value of electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (EABR) monitoring combined with brainstem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) and compound action potential (CAP) monitoring during vestibular schwannoma resection for the protection of the cochlear nerve. Methods: Clinical data from 12 patients with vestibular schwannomas who had useful hearing prior to surgery were analyzed at the PLA General Hospital from January to December 2021. Among them, there were 7 males and 5 females, ranging in age from 25 to 59 years. Before surgery, patients underwent audiology assessments (including pure tone audiometry, speech recognition rate, etc.), facial nerve function evaluation, and cranial MRI. They then underwent vestibular schwannoma resection via the retrosigmoid approach. EABR, BAEP, and CAP were simultaneously monitored during surgery, and patients' hearing preservation was observed and analyzed after surgery. Results: Prior to surgery, the average PTA threshold of the 12 patients ranged from11 to 49 dBHL, with a SDS of 80% to 100%. Six patients had grade A hearing, and six patients had grade B hearing. All 12 patients had House-Brackman grade I facial nerve function prior to surgery. The MRI indicated tumor diameters between 1.1 and 2.4 cm. Complete removal was achieved in 10/12 patients, while near-total removal was achieved in 2/12 patients. There were no serious complications at the one-month follow-up after surgery. At the three-month follow-up, all 12 patients had House-Brackman grade I or II facial nerve function. Under EABR with CAP and BAEP monitoring, successful preservation of the cochlear nerve was achieved in six of ten patients (2 with grade B hearing, 3 with grade C hearing, and 1 with grade D hearing). Successful preservation of the cochlear nerve was not achieved in another four patients (all with grade D hearing). In two patients, EABR monitoring was unsuccessful due to interference signals; however, Grade C or higher hearing was successfully preserved under BAEP and CAP monitoring. Conclusion: The application of EABR monitoring combined with BAEP and CAP monitoring during vestibular schwannoma resection can help improve postoperative preservation of the cochlear nerve and hearing.
