Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of adverse childhood experiences international questionnaire in parents of preschool children.
- Author:
Xiao Yi MI
1
;
Shan Shan HOU
2
;
Zi Yuan FU
1
;
Mo ZHOU
1
;
Xin Xuan LI
3
;
Zhao Xue MENG
2
;
Hua fang JIANG
4
;
Hong ZHOU
1
Author Information
1. Department of Maternal and Child Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.
2. Tongzhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Beijing, Beijing 101101.
3. School of Health Humanities, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.
4. Weifang Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Shandong, Weifang 261000, Shandong, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Adverse childhood experiences;
Parents of preschool children;
Reliability;
Validity
- MeSH:
Humans;
Child, Preschool;
Adverse Childhood Experiences;
Reproducibility of Results;
Parents/psychology*;
Surveys and Questionnaires;
China;
Psychometrics/methods*
- From:
Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences)
2023;55(3):408-414
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of adverse childhood experiences international questionnaire (ACE-IQ) in Chinese parents of preschool children.
METHODS:The parents of preschool children in 6 kindergartens in Tongzhou District of Beijing were selected by stratified random cluster sampling, and the Chinese version of ACE-IQ after translation and adaptation was used for survey online. The collected data were randomly divided into two parts. One part of the data (n=602) was used for exploratory factor analysis (EFA), to screen items and evaluate structural validity, and then form the final Chinese version of ACE-IQ. The other part of the data (n=700) was used for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), criterion validity analysis and reliability analysis. At the same time, experts investigation method was used to evaluate the content validity of the final Chinese version of ACE-IQ.
RESULTS:After deleting four items of collective violence, the Chinese version of ACE-IQ with twenty-five items indicated good structural, criterion and content validity. Analysis results showed that the Chinese version of ACE-IQ presented a seven-factor model dimension, namely emotional neglect, physical neglect, family dysfunction, family violence, emotional and physical abuse, sexual abuse and violence outside the home, and the total score of the binary version of ACE-IQ Chinese version was positively correlated with the total score of childhood trauma questionaire-28 item short form (CTQ-SF, r=0.354, P < 0.001) and the center for epidemiological studies depression scale (CES-D, r=0.313, P < 0.001) respectively. Results from five experts showed that the item-level content validity index (I-CVI) of 25 items was between 0.80 and 1.00, and the average of all I-CVIs on the scale (S-CVI/Ave) of the scale was 0.984. At the same time, the internal consistency (Cronbach's α coefficient) of the whole scale was 0.818, and the split-half reliability (Spearman-Brown coefficient) was 0.621, which demonstrated good reliability.
CONCLUSION:This study has formed a Chinese version of ACE-IQ with 25 items and 7 dimensions, which has good reliability and validity among the parents of preschool children in China. It can be used as an evaluation instrument for measuring the minimum threshold of the adverse childhood experiences in the parents of preschool children in the cultural background of China.
