Magnification Error in Digital Radiographs of the Cervical Spine Against Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measurements.
- Author:
Hideki SHIGEMATSU
1
;
Munehisa KOIZUMI
;
Masana YONEDA
;
Jin IIDA
;
Takuya OSHIMA
;
Yasuhito TANAKA
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Cervical spine; Magnification error; Digital radiography; Body mass index; Picture archiving and communication system
- MeSH: Body Mass Index; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging*; Prospective Studies; Radiographic Image Enhancement; Radiography; Spine*
- From:Asian Spine Journal 2013;7(4):267-272
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. PURPOSE: The main purpose of this study was to clarify the range of magnification errors on digital plain radiographs and to determine if there is a correlation between the body mass index (BMI) of a patient and the magnification error. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Most clinicians currently use digital plain radiography. This new method allows one to access images and measure lengths and angles more easily than with the past technologies. In addition, conventional plain radiography has magnification errors. Although few articles mention magnification errors in regards to digital radiographs, they are known to have the same errors. METHODS: We used plain digital radiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to acquire images of the cervical spine with the goal of evaluating magnification errors by measuring the anteroposterior vertebral body lengths of C2 and C5. The magnification error (ME) was then calculated: ME=(length on radiograph-length on MRI)/length on MRI x100 (%). The correlation coefficient between the magnification error and BMI was obtained using Pearson's correlation analysis. RESULTS: Average magnification errors in C2 and C5 were approximately 18.5%+/-5.4% (range, 0%-30%) and 20.7%+/-6.3% (range, 1%-32%). There was no positive correlation between BMI and the magnification error. CONCLUSIONS: There were magnification errors on the digital plain radiographs, and they were different in each case. Maximum magnification error differences were 30% (C2) and 31% (C5). Based on these finding, clinicians must pay attention to magnification errors when measuring lengths using digital plain radiography.
