Transient elastography technology role assessment during the diagnosis and treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection.
10.3760/cma.j.cn501113-20221129-00585
- Author:
Wen Ping ZHAO
1
;
Li Min WANG
1
;
Jing Yue WANG
1
;
Si XIE
1
;
Jie Hua JIN
1
;
Yuan HUANG
1
Author Information
1. Department of Hepatobiliary Medicine, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Tsinghua University, Beijing 102218, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Chronic infection;
Diagnosis;
Hepatitis B virus;
Immune clearance stage;
Immune tolerance stage;
Immunological control stage;
Transient elastography;
Uncertain period
- MeSH:
Humans;
Male;
Female;
Hepatitis B, Chronic/drug therapy*;
Liver Cirrhosis/pathology*;
Elasticity Imaging Techniques;
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use*;
Liver/pathology*
- From:
Chinese Journal of Hepatology
2023;31(5):489-494
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective: To explore the role of transient elastography technology in the assessment of disease staging and treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Methods: Patients who were clinically diagnosed with chronic HBV infection at Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital from January 2018 to December 2021 was collected. Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) examination was performed more than once by transient elastography. The count data were expressed as cases (%) and the χ (2) test was made. Fisher's exact test was used with theoretical frequency less than 5. The measurement data between two groups was compared by t-test. Multiple groups were compared with an analysis of variance. Results: 1 055 patients were included in this study, including 669 (63.4%) males and 386 (36.6%) females. 757 (71.8%) patients were untreated. Among the untreated patients, the LSM value in the immune clearance (10.2 ± 3.8) kPa (187 cases, 40.4%), and the reactivation stages (9.1 ± 3.4) kPa (114 cases, 24.6%) was significantly higher than that in the immune tolerance (8.7 ± 3.6) kPa (78 cases, 16.8%) and immune control stages (8.4 ± 3.5) KPa (84 cases, 18.1%), and the difference between the four groups was statistically significant (F = 5.31 and P = 0.03). With ALT (male: 30 U/L, female: 19 U/L) as defined the normal value, the LSM value in the immune tolerance and the immune control stages were (5.8 ± 0.9) kPa and (7.1 ± 2.5) kPa, respectively, which were significantly lower than those of patients in the immune tolerance and immune control stages, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.01). There were 294 (38.8%) patients with uncertain period, excluding patients with fatty liver. Patients with uncertain periods were divided into four gray zone (GZ) groups: immune tolerance stage: LSM (5.1 ± 1.3) kPa was significantly lower than GZ-A (6.5 ± 2.4) kPa, t = 2.06, P = 0.03, and the difference was statistically significant; immune control stage: LSM was (5.6 ± 1.5) kPa, which was also lower than GZ-C (6.8 ± 1.3) kPa, t = 3.08, P = 0.02, and the difference was statistically significant; immune clearance stage: LSM > 8.0 kPa. LSM values showed a year-by-year reduction in patients with expanded indications who started antiviral treatment and were followed up for three years. Conclusion: The LSM value is significantly lower after the decrease of the defined high-normal ALT value in patients with the immune tolerance and immune control stages of chronic HBV infection. The LSM values of GZ-A and GZ-C in the uncertain periods of chronic HBV infection are higher than those of patients in the immune tolerance and immune control stages.
