The status and influencing factors of presenteeism among clinical nurses: a systematic review.
10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20220617-00326
- VernacularTitle:临床护士隐性缺勤现状及影响因素评价
- Author:
Wan Ying NI
1
;
Jia Lin WANG
1
;
Jie YUN
2
;
Wan Qing XIE
3
;
Chun MA
1
;
Si Hui SU
1
Author Information
1. College of Nursing, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 611137, China.
2. Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Chengdu 610032, China.
3. Department of Hospital Infection Control Disinfection Supply Room, State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Influencing factors;
Nurse;
Presenteeism;
Status;
Systematic review
- MeSH:
Humans;
Female;
Child;
Presenteeism;
Cross-Sectional Studies;
Mental Health;
PubMed;
Nurses
- From:
Chinese Journal of Industrial Hygiene and Occupational Diseases
2023;41(4):286-293
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective: To systematically review the status and factors influencing presenteeism among clinical nurses. Methods: In December 2021, CNKI, CBM, Wanfang, VIP, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsyclNFO and other databases were electronically searched to cross sectional studies on the current situation and factors influencing the occurrence of presenteeism among clinical nurses. The search terms mainly included presenteeism, sick at work, Stanford Presenteeism Scale, nurse, level, risk factor, influence, et al. And the search time was from the establishment of the database to November 30, 2021. Literature screening, data extraction and evaluation of the risk of bias in the included literature were done independently by two researchers, and meta-analysis was performed using Stata 15.1 software. Results: A total of 29 studies involving 13 535 clinical nurses were included.The results of the meta-analysis showed that the score of presenteeism was 17.99 [95% CI (17.02-18.95), P =0.000]. Subgroup analysis showed that presenteeism scores were higher in articles published before 2020 (ES=19.28, 95%CI: 18.41-20.15, P=0.000) and in the group of nurses aged 36 to 40 years (ES=19.27, 95%CI: 17.35~21.19, P=0.000), female (ES= 17.04, 95%CI: 14.70-19.39, P=0.000), secondary school education (ES=21.01, 95%CI: 17.76-24.26, P= 0.007), married (ES=17.49, 95%CI: 15.13-19.85, P=0.000), working for 5 to 10 years (ES=17.78, 95%CI: 16.54-19.02, P=0.000), contract (ES=17.05, 95%CI: 15.23-18.87, P=0.000), working in pediatrics (ES= 16.65, 95% CI: 15.31-17.99, P=0.000) and European region (ES =21.21, 95% CI: 20.50-21.93, P=0.000) . Conclusion: Current evidence suggests that clinical nurses are at high risk of presenteeism, which is affected by variety of factors. The managers should pay attention to the physical and mental health of nurses, identify high-risk factors as early as possible and take measures to reduce the occurrence of presenteeism and improve the quality of nursing.
