Investigation and analysis of late reporting and under-reporting of occupational diseases from 2018 to 2020 in China.
10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20221009-00480
- Author:
An Qi LIU
1
;
Dan WANG
1
;
Xin Xin LI
1
;
Jin Hao WU
1
;
Hongfei WANG
1
;
Wei Jiang HU
1
Author Information
1. National Institute for Occupational Health and Poison Control, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100050, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Late reporting;
Occupational diseases reporting;
Policy recommendations;
Under-reporting
- MeSH:
Humans;
Occupational Diseases/diagnosis*;
China/epidemiology*;
Incidence
- From:
Chinese Journal of Industrial Hygiene and Occupational Diseases
2023;41(5):353-357
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective: To understand the late reporting and the under-reporting of occupational disease from 2018 to 2020 in China and analyze the causes, so as to provide scientific evidence for improving the quality of occupational disease reports in China, timely acquiring the incidence of occupational disease, and assessing the occupational hazards. Methods: From May to December 2021, A total of 320 occupational disease diagnostic institutions were selected for investigation. The original documents of occupational disease diagnosis cases from 2018 to 2020 were compared with the online reported cases, and late reported and under-reported cases of occupational disease were analyzed. Results: A total of 32207 diagnosed cases from 2018 to 2020 were investigated, including 28934 confirmed cases and 3273 cases without occupational disease. The overall late reported rate and under-reported rate of confirmed cases were 20.2% and 2.1%, respectively. There were significant differences in the rate of late reporting and under-reporting of occupational diseases in different regions and different types of diagnostic institutions (P<0.001). The southwest region had the highest rates of late reporting and under-reporting, 61.6% and 7.9% respectively. The late reported rate of all kinds of occupational diseases was about 15.0%, and the under-reported rate was from 1.5.0% to 5.0%. Conclusion: At present, the phenomenon of late reporting and under-reporting occupational diseases is still obvious. It is necessary to strengthen the inspection of occupational disease reporting, improve the quality of occupational disease reporting, and provide scientific basis for the formulation of occupational disease prevention and control policies.
