Analysis of verification results of protective effects of hearing protectors in different industries.
10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20211026-00516
- Author:
Han Xue SHI
1
;
Shi Biao SU
2
;
Ming LIU
2
;
Rong Zong LI
2
;
Tian Jian WANG
2
;
Bin XIAO
2
Author Information
1. Guangdong Province Hospital for Occuaptional Diseasse Prevention and Treatment, Guangzhou 510300, China School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
2. Guangdong Province Hospital for Occuaptional Diseasse Prevention and Treatment, Guangzhou 510300, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Attenuation;
Epidemiologic factors;
Hearing protectors;
Individual fit testing;
Noise
- MeSH:
Male;
Humans;
Adult;
Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced/prevention & control*;
Ear Protective Devices;
Noise, Occupational/prevention & control*;
Hearing;
Audiometry
- From:
Chinese Journal of Industrial Hygiene and Occupational Diseases
2023;41(5):333-337
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective: To get insight into the current practice of noise reduction effect of workers as they wore hearing protectors in different domestic enterprises and the possible affected factors. Methods: From October 2020 to April 2021, using a random sampling method, 1197 workers exposed to noise in petrochemical factories, textile factories, and parts manufacturing factories were selected as the study subjects. The noise reduction effect of hearing protectors worn by workers in daily use was tested using a hearing protector suitability testing system. The personal sound attenuation level (PAR) was compared among workers in three enterprises, Targeted intervention and repetitive testing were conducted for workers who did not meet the noise reduction effect required by the enterprise, and the changes in PAR of workers before and after the intervention were compared. The comparison of baseline PARs between two or more groups was performed using the Mann Whitney test, the comparison of baseline PARs with post intervention PARs was performed using the Wilcoxon signed rank sum test, and the comparison of qualitative data between two or more groups was performed using the Chi square test. Results: The median baseline PAR for all workers was 15 dB. Men, age<30 years old, education level at or above college level, working experience of 5 to 15 years, and those who used hearing protectors for 5 to 15 years had higher PARs, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). The median difference in baseline PAR among workers from three enterprises was statistically significant (H=175.06, P<0.01). The median PAR of subjects who did not pass the baseline increased from 3 dB to 21 dB after intervention (Z=-27.92, P<0.01) . Conclusion: Some workers wearing hearing protectors do not meet the required PAR, and low PARs may be related to incorrect wearing methods and incorrect selection of hearing protectors. As a tool for testing, training, and assisting in selection, the hearing protector suitability testing system is of great significance for worker hearing protection.
