Retrospective Analysis of 291 Cases of Medical Malpractice Involving Death.
10.12116/j.issn.1004-5619.2019.06.010
- Author:
Li Jian CHEN
1
;
Yong Ling LIAN
1
;
Li Zeng LI
1
;
Xia YUE
1
;
Dong Fang QIAO
1
;
Dong Ri LI
1
;
Hui Jun WANG
1
;
Qi WANG
1
Author Information
1. School of Forensic Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
forensic pathology;
retrospective studies;
cause of death;
medical malpractice;
cases analysis
- MeSH:
Autopsy;
Cause of Death;
Child;
Death;
Female;
Hospital Departments/statistics & numerical data*;
Humans;
Male;
Malpractice/statistics & numerical data*;
Medical Errors/statistics & numerical data*;
Pregnancy;
Retrospective Studies;
Young Adult
- From:
Journal of Forensic Medicine
2019;35(6):701-705
- CountryChina
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Objective To study the medical malpractice cases involving death, and discuss the identification ideas and methods of medical malpractice cases. Methods A total of 291 medical malpractice cases involving death accepted and settled from January 2012 to December 2017 at the Judicial Appraisal Center of Southern Medical University were collected. Based on the age, gender, hospital level, clinical department, whether or not autopsy was performed, cause of death, cause of medical mistakes, causality and causative potency of the appraised person, statistical analysis was made. Results There were more males than females in medical malpractice cases involving death. Mostly young adults or children were involved in these cases. The number of cases involving tertiary hospitals was the highest; among the clinical departments, the internal medicine department had the largest number of cases, followed by surgery, obstetrics and gynecology, pediatrics, etc. Autopsy rate has a trend of increasing year by year. Most patients die from the natural outcomes of their disease or ineffective treatment. Most hospitals have certain medical mistakes, and have an indirect correlation with the patient's death, mainly slight factors. Conclusion Judicial appraisal of medical malpractice should follow the principle of "one-effect and multi-cause", and comprehensively consider various factors such as, the diseases and constitution of the patient, natural outcomes of the diseases, the current medical technology and the level of diagnosis and treatment of the hospital, etc.
