Ion Abundance Ratios of Qualitative Analysis by GC-MS of 4 Common Drugs （Poisons.
10.12116/j.issn.1004-5619.2019.06.008
- Author:
Shao Dan LIU
1
;
Tao MIN
1
;
Guo Bin XIN
2
;
Da Ming ZHANG
2
Author Information
1. Dian Institute of Forensic Sciences, Hangzhou 310000, China.
2. Forensic Judicial Appraisal Center of Beijing Public Security Bureau, Beijing 100192, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
forensic toxicology;
gas chromatography-mass spectrometry;
dichlorvos;
phorate;
diazepam;
estazolam;
characteristic fragment ion
- MeSH:
Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry;
Humans;
Ions/chemistry*;
Limit of Detection;
Liquid-Liquid Extraction;
Poisons/blood*
- From:
Journal of Forensic Medicine
2019;35(6):687-694
- CountryChina
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the maximum allowable deviation of ion abundance ratios of characteristic fragment ions in common drugs （poisons） in blood by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry （GC-MS） method. Methods Four common drugs （poisons） （dichlorvos, phorate, diazepam and estazolam） were detected by GC-MS full scan mode after liquid-liquid extraction in two laboratories and under three chromatographic conditions. The deviations of ion abundance ratios of the four common drugs （poisons） in marked blood samples with concentrations of 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 5.0 and 10.0 μg/mL were analyzed. At the same time, the false negative rates of ion abundance ratios were analyzed when the mass concentration was limit of detection （LOD）, 2LOD, limit of quantitation （LOQ） and 2LOQ, and the false positive rates of ion abundance ratios were analyzed with blank blood samples. Results Under the two laboratories, four common drugs （poisons） and three kinds of chromatography conditions, the differences in deviations of the ion abundance ratios of marked blood samples were not statistically significant （P>0.05）. More than 95% of the absolute deviations of the ion abundance ratios of the marked blood samples were within the range of ±10%, and more than 95% of the relative deviations were within the range of ±25%. In cases of low concentration （concentration less than 2LOQ） or low signal to noise ratio （3-15）, the false negative rate was less than 5% and the false positive rate was 0% when the relative deviation was greater than 50%. Conclusion The absolute deviations of ion abundance ratios of four common drugs （poisons） in marked blood samples are advised to have a determination range within ±10%, and the determination range of relative deviations within ±25%.
